diff --git a/ARCHITECTURE.md b/ARCHITECTURE.md
index e6dafbcc2..4e6d82cb3 100644
--- a/ARCHITECTURE.md
+++ b/ARCHITECTURE.md
@@ -114,11 +114,11 @@ boundaries above remain the target modular MSA architecture.
 | `membership_target` | language, episode, template, department, and opportunity-pool targets cannot collapse into entity or project |
 | `topic_measurement` | logistic-normal ALR/ILR coordinates and the CPU `f64` TRSL-TM reference estimator |
 | `analysis_engine` | bounded cutoff-safe temporal evidence readiness execution and digest-bound terminal artifacts |
-| `psychometric_core` | posterior-aware structural input gates, CWC within/between OLS plus the contextual effect, event-time log-rate, unequal-interval discrete-lag remapping, constant-predictor discrete effect, time-varying-predictor discrete effect (Eq. 14), exact scalar discrete process noise (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3), lagged latent covariance and unconditional latent variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4), stationary within-subject variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 4 as `Δt → ∞`; `asymDIFFUSION`), trait-plus-state variance (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `TRAITVAR`; not process noise), observed-indicator variance and lagged observed covariance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5; Table 2 `MANIFESTVAR` is `Θ`, not `Var(y)`; `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not `MANIFESTVAR`; `Θ` does not enter lagged observed covariance; observed-indicator mean is `τ + λ μ`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y)`; `CINT` is not `MANIFESTMEANS`; discrete latent mean is `exp(a Δt) μ_0 + (exp(a Δt) − 1)/a κ`; `T0MEANS` is not `μ_t`; `CINT` is not the discrete increment; evolved observed mean is `τ + λ μ_t`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not `E(y_t)`; contemporaneous `TDPREDEFFECT` impulse is `m x`, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that contemporaneous impulse is `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; time-independent `TIPREDEFFECT` increment is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, not `M x`, not Voelkle Eq. 14, and not the coefficient `B`; Eq. 5 of that increment is `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`; within-interval `TDPREDEFFECT` carry is `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`, not the contemporaneous Dirac, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that carried observed mean when `u ≠ t`; first-occasion `T0TIPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_b z` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` (`T0TIPREDEFFECT` is not `TIPREDEFFECT` `B`; `t0_b z` is not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`; `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` is not `t0_b z`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean), first-occasion `T0TDPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_m x0` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` (`T0TDPREDEFFECT` is not `TDPREDEFFECT` `M`; `t0_m x0` is not `M x`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `t0_m x0`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`; `t0_m x0` is not `t0_b z`; an impulse at `u ≤ t0` that used `M` is already in `η(t0)` as `TDPREDEFFECT`, not as `T0TDPREDEFFECT`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_m x0)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` is not that observed mean; §7.2 level-change `CINT` is `κ = −a m x` with `a < 0` so `−κ / a = m x` (`−a m x` is not the dissipating Dirac, not a free `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not the extra near-zero-drift latent process also named in §7.2; Eq. 3 of that setting is `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, which is not `m x`, not `κ`, and not `TIPREDEFFECT`; §7.2 extra-process contribution is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)` (`ε = a` is `a_{ηξ} x Δt e^{a Δt}`; identification `TDPREDEFFECT` on the extra process is 1; printed extra `DRIFT` is `−0.000001`; not `κ = −a m x`, not `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, and not the dissipating Dirac `m x`; `ε ≥ 0` fails closed; Eq. 5 of that contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)`; the extra process has `LAMBDA` 0 and is not an observed indicator; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the contribution is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-contribution latent mean is not `E(y_t)`; after-t0 extra-process `TDPREDEFFECT` is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)` for `t0 < u < t` while `μ_t` uses `Δt`; Eq. 5 of that after-t0 contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)`; the first-occasion extra-process observed mean is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t0`; `e^{a(t−u)} m x` is a Dirac on the original process, not this `DRIFT` drive; §7.2 `asymTIPREDEFFECT` is `-B z / a` for `a < 0` (`-B z / a` is not the coefficient `B`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`; §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `(B / a)² v`, not `TRAITVAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`, and not `-B z / a`; Table 2 `asymCINT` is `-κ / a` for `a < 0` and is not `κ`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ`, not `T0MEANS`, and not `-B z / a`; p. 16 stationary `T0MEANS` is `-κ / a + −B z / a` and is not free `T0MEANS`, not `asymCINT` alone, not `asymTIPREDEFFECT` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent mean; Eq. 5 of that constrained mean is `τ + λ(−κ / a + −B z / a)`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(−κ / a)` is not that observed mean when `B z ≠ 0`; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_0)`; the constrained latent mean is not `E(y_0)`; stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v` (not free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION` alone, not `TRAITVAR` alone, not `addedTIPREDVAR` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent variance. Eq. 5 of that constrained variance is `λ²(trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` (JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T03:20Z; form the stationary latent variance first, then `λ² p + θ + ψ`; `λ² p_0` is not that observed variance; `λ²(−q / (2 a)) + θ` is not that observed variance when `TRAITVAR` or `addedTIPREDVAR` is nonzero; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_0)`; the constrained latent variance is not `Var(y_0)`); lagged stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay; contemporaneous `T0VAR` is not that lagged map; decaying the constrained total as if it were all state is not that lagged map; Eq. 5 of that lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v) + ψ`; `Θ` does not enter; contemporaneous `Var(y_0)` is not that lagged observed covariance; the lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance); later-occasion stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`; under stationarity that composition equals contemporaneous `T0VAR`; evolving the constrained total as if it were all state is not that later map; the lagged covariance omits `Q_Δt`; `Q_Δt` is not that later map; Eq. 5 of that later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; lagged observed covariance omits `Q_Δt` and `θ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`; the later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`))), irregular already-centered residual lag, Rubin `T` on OLS loadings, and strong-gated latent means (two-observation residual variance is identically `0` and caps at strong/scalar; Putnick & Bornstein, 2016) |
+| `psychometric_core` | posterior-aware structural input gates, CWC within/between OLS plus the contextual effect, event-time log-rate, unequal-interval discrete-lag remapping, constant-predictor discrete effect, time-varying-predictor discrete effect (Eq. 14), exact scalar discrete process noise (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3), lagged latent covariance and unconditional latent variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4), stationary within-subject variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 4 as `Δt → ∞`; `asymDIFFUSION`), trait-plus-state variance (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `TRAITVAR`; not process noise), observed-indicator variance and lagged observed covariance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5; Table 2 `MANIFESTVAR` is `Θ`, not `Var(y)`; `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not `MANIFESTVAR`; `Θ` does not enter lagged observed covariance; observed-indicator mean is `τ + λ μ`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y)`; `CINT` is not `MANIFESTMEANS`; discrete latent mean is `exp(a Δt) μ_0 + (exp(a Δt) − 1)/a κ`; `T0MEANS` is not `μ_t`; `CINT` is not the discrete increment; evolved observed mean is `τ + λ μ_t`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not `E(y_t)`; contemporaneous `TDPREDEFFECT` impulse is `m x`, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that contemporaneous impulse is `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; time-independent `TIPREDEFFECT` increment is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, not `M x`, not Voelkle Eq. 14, and not the coefficient `B`; Eq. 5 of that increment is `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`; within-interval `TDPREDEFFECT` carry is `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`, not the contemporaneous Dirac, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that carried observed mean when `u ≠ t`; first-occasion `T0TIPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_b z` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` (`T0TIPREDEFFECT` is not `TIPREDEFFECT` `B`; `t0_b z` is not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`; `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` is not `t0_b z`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean), first-occasion `T0TDPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_m x0` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` (`T0TDPREDEFFECT` is not `TDPREDEFFECT` `M`; `t0_m x0` is not `M x`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `t0_m x0`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`; `t0_m x0` is not `t0_b z`; an impulse at `u ≤ t0` that used `M` is already in `η(t0)` as `TDPREDEFFECT`, not as `T0TDPREDEFFECT`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_m x0)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` is not that observed mean; §7.2 level-change `CINT` is `κ = −a m x` with `a < 0` so `−κ / a = m x` (`−a m x` is not the dissipating Dirac, not a free `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not the extra near-zero-drift latent process also named in §7.2; Eq. 3 of that setting is `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, which is not `m x`, not `κ`, and not `TIPREDEFFECT`; §7.2 extra-process contribution is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)` (`ε = a` is `a_{ηξ} x Δt e^{a Δt}`; identification `TDPREDEFFECT` on the extra process is 1; printed extra `DRIFT` is `−0.000001`; not `κ = −a m x`, not `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, and not the dissipating Dirac `m x`; `ε ≥ 0` fails closed; Eq. 5 of that contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)`; the extra process has `LAMBDA` 0 and is not an observed indicator; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the contribution is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-contribution latent mean is not `E(y_t)`; after-t0 extra-process `TDPREDEFFECT` is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)` for `t0 < u < t` while `μ_t` uses `Δt`; Eq. 5 of that after-t0 contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)`; the first-occasion extra-process observed mean is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t0`; `e^{a(t−u)} m x` is a Dirac on the original process, not this `DRIFT` drive; §7.2 `asymTIPREDEFFECT` is `-B z / a` for `a < 0` (`-B z / a` is not the coefficient `B`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`; §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `(B / a)² v`, not `TRAITVAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`, and not `-B z / a`; Table 2 `asymCINT` is `-κ / a` for `a < 0` and is not `κ`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ`, not `T0MEANS`, and not `-B z / a`; p. 16 stationary `T0MEANS` is `-κ / a + −B z / a` and is not free `T0MEANS`, not `asymCINT` alone, not `asymTIPREDEFFECT` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent mean; Eq. 5 of that constrained mean is `τ + λ(−κ / a + −B z / a)`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(−κ / a)` is not that observed mean when `B z ≠ 0`; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_0)`; the constrained latent mean is not `E(y_0)`; stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v` (not free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION` alone, not `TRAITVAR` alone, not `addedTIPREDVAR` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent variance. Eq. 5 of that constrained variance is `λ²(trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` (JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T03:20Z; form the stationary latent variance first, then `λ² p + θ + ψ`; `λ² p_0` is not that observed variance; `λ²(−q / (2 a)) + θ` is not that observed variance when `TRAITVAR` or `addedTIPREDVAR` is nonzero; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_0)`; the constrained latent variance is not `Var(y_0)`); lagged stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay; contemporaneous `T0VAR` is not that lagged map; decaying the constrained total as if it were all state is not that lagged map; Eq. 5 of that lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v) + ψ`; `Θ` does not enter; contemporaneous `Var(y_0)` is not that lagged observed covariance; the lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance); later-occasion stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`; under stationarity that composition equals contemporaneous `T0VAR`; evolving the constrained total as if it were all state is not that later map; the lagged covariance omits `Q_Δt`; `Q_Δt` is not that later map; Eq. 5 of that later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; lagged observed covariance omits `Q_Δt` and `θ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`; the later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`))), Hamaker Eq. 1a occasion-mean residual lag (not within-person; not RI-CLPM), irregular already-centered residual lag, Rubin `T` on OLS loadings, and strong-gated latent means (two-observation residual variance is identically `0` and caps at strong/scalar; Putnick & Bornstein, 2016) |
 | `validation_core` | RMSE, bias, coverage, graph, and Monte Carlo metrics |
 | `tepp_api` | versioned DTO, schema, and export contracts |
-| `psychometric_core` | posterior-aware structural input gates, CWC within/between OLS plus the contextual effect, event-time log-rate, unequal-interval discrete-lag remapping, constant-predictor discrete effect, time-varying-predictor discrete effect (Eq. 14), exact scalar discrete process noise (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3), lagged latent covariance and unconditional latent variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4), stationary within-subject variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 4 as `Δt → ∞`; `asymDIFFUSION`), trait-plus-state variance (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `TRAITVAR`; not process noise), observed-indicator variance and lagged observed covariance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5; Table 2 `MANIFESTVAR` is `Θ`, not `Var(y)`; `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not `MANIFESTVAR`; `Θ` does not enter lagged observed covariance; observed-indicator mean is `τ + λ μ`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y)`; `CINT` is not `MANIFESTMEANS`; discrete latent mean is `exp(a Δt) μ_0 + (exp(a Δt) − 1)/a κ`; `T0MEANS` is not `μ_t`; `CINT` is not the discrete increment; evolved observed mean is `τ + λ μ_t`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not `E(y_t)`; contemporaneous `TDPREDEFFECT` impulse is `m x`, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that contemporaneous impulse is `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; time-independent `TIPREDEFFECT` increment is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, not `M x`, not Voelkle Eq. 14, and not the coefficient `B`; Eq. 5 of that increment is `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`; within-interval `TDPREDEFFECT` carry is `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`, not the contemporaneous Dirac, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that carried observed mean when `u ≠ t`; first-occasion `T0TIPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_b z` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` (`T0TIPREDEFFECT` is not `TIPREDEFFECT` `B`; `t0_b z` is not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`; `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` is not `t0_b z`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean), first-occasion `T0TDPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_m x0` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` (`T0TDPREDEFFECT` is not `TDPREDEFFECT` `M`; `t0_m x0` is not `M x`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `t0_m x0`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`; `t0_m x0` is not `t0_b z`; an impulse at `u ≤ t0` that used `M` is already in `η(t0)` as `TDPREDEFFECT`, not as `T0TDPREDEFFECT`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_m x0)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` is not that observed mean; §7.2 level-change `CINT` is `κ = −a m x` with `a < 0` so `−κ / a = m x` (`−a m x` is not the dissipating Dirac, not a free `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not the extra near-zero-drift latent process also named in §7.2; Eq. 3 of that setting is `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, which is not `m x`, not `κ`, and not `TIPREDEFFECT`; §7.2 extra-process contribution is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)` (`ε = a` is `a_{ηξ} x Δt e^{a Δt}`; identification `TDPREDEFFECT` on the extra process is 1; printed extra `DRIFT` is `−0.000001`; not `κ = −a m x`, not `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, and not the dissipating Dirac `m x`; `ε ≥ 0` fails closed; Eq. 5 of that contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)`; the extra process has `LAMBDA` 0 and is not an observed indicator; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the contribution is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-contribution latent mean is not `E(y_t)`; after-t0 extra-process `TDPREDEFFECT` is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)` for `t0 < u < t` while `μ_t` uses `Δt`; Eq. 5 of that after-t0 contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)`; the first-occasion extra-process observed mean is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t0`; `e^{a(t−u)} m x` is a Dirac on the original process, not this `DRIFT` drive; §7.2 `asymTIPREDEFFECT` is `-B z / a` for `a < 0` (`-B z / a` is not the coefficient `B`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`; §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `(B / a)² v`, not `TRAITVAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`, and not `-B z / a`; Table 2 `asymCINT` is `-κ / a` for `a < 0` and is not `κ`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ`, not `T0MEANS`, and not `-B z / a`; p. 16 stationary `T0MEANS` is `-κ / a + −B z / a` and is not free `T0MEANS`, not `asymCINT` alone, not `asymTIPREDEFFECT` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent mean; Eq. 5 of that constrained mean is `τ + λ(−κ / a + −B z / a)`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(−κ / a)` is not that observed mean when `B z ≠ 0`; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_0)`; the constrained latent mean is not `E(y_0)`; stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v` (not free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION` alone, not `TRAITVAR` alone, not `addedTIPREDVAR` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent variance. Eq. 5 of that constrained variance is `λ²(trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` (JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T03:20Z; form the stationary latent variance first, then `λ² p + θ + ψ`; `λ² p_0` is not that observed variance; `λ²(−q / (2 a)) + θ` is not that observed variance when `TRAITVAR` or `addedTIPREDVAR` is nonzero; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_0)`; the constrained latent variance is not `Var(y_0)`); lagged stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay; contemporaneous `T0VAR` is not that lagged map; decaying the constrained total as if it were all state is not that lagged map; Eq. 5 of that lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v) + ψ`; `Θ` does not enter; contemporaneous `Var(y_0)` is not that lagged observed covariance; the lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance); later-occasion stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`; under stationarity that composition equals contemporaneous `T0VAR`; evolving the constrained total as if it were all state is not that later map; the lagged covariance omits `Q_Δt`; `Q_Δt` is not that later map; Eq. 5 of that later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; lagged observed covariance omits `Q_Δt` and `θ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`; the later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`); predetermined later-occasion `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (free `T0VAR` `p_0` is not that later map; setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary later-occasion map; stationary later variance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that later map when `p_0` is free; evolving `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` as if it were all state is not that later map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`; the predetermined later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`; stationary later observed variance is not that observed variance when `p_0` is free); predetermined lagged `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v` (free `T0VAR` `p_0` is not that lagged map; setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary lagged map; stationary lagged covariance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that lagged map when `p_0` is free; evolving `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` as if it were all state is not that lagged map; later-occasion variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that lagged map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v) + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` does not enter; the predetermined lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance; predetermined later observed variance includes `Q_Δt` and `θ` and is not that lagged observed covariance; stationary lagged observed covariance is not that observed covariance when `p_0` is free; the predetermined first-occasion variance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v`; free `p_0` is not that map; stationary first-occasion variance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that map when `p_0` is free; lagged covariance decays the state and is not that map; later-occasion variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined first-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not that first-occasion observed variance; the predetermined first-occasion latent variance is not that observed variance; stationary first-occasion observed variance is not that observed variance when `p_0` is free; predetermined later observed variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that first-occasion observed variance; later-start lagged covariance of predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `startoffset`; Eq. 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T10:27Z; first-occasion lagged omits `e^{a s} Q_u`; later-occasion variance does not lag; stationary lagged uses `−q / (2 a)`; decaying the later total is not that map; Eq. 5 of that later-start lagged covariance is `λ²` of it plus `ψ`; `Θ` does not enter; first-occasion lagged observed omits `e^{a s} Q_u`; later observed variance includes `Q_u` and `θ`; later-start later-occasion variance of predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + Q_s + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `startoffset`; Eq. 3–4 Chapman–Kolmogorov `Q_{u+s} = e^{2 a s} Q_u + Q_s`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T11:05Z; later-occasion variance at `u` omits `Q_s`; later-start lagged covariance omits `Q_s`; stationary later uses `−q / (2 a)`; evolving the later total as if it were all state is not that map; ignoring `startoffset` omits `e^{2 a s} Q_u`; Eq. 5 of that later-start later-occasion variance is `λ²` of it plus `θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not that observed variance; p. 16 `discreteDRIFTstd` is `e^{a Δt}` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4; unstandardised `e^{a Δt}` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`; the §7.1 trait-plus-state autocorrelation uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `discreteDIFFUSIONstd` is `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4; unstandardised `Q_Δt` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; the continuous standardisation `−2 a` is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; `Q_Δt / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `DIFFUSIONstd` is `q / (−q / (2 a)) = −2 a` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; Eq. 4; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T13:20Z; unstandardised `q` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; the discrete standardisation `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a))` depends on `Δt` and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; `q / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `DRIFTstd` is the continuous auto-effect after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; Eq. 1; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T13:28Z); unstandardised `a` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DRIFTstd`; the discrete standardisation `e^{a Δt}` depends on the event interval and is not `DRIFTstd`; `a p / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DRIFTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); p. 16 `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` is `(-B / a) · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; §7.2; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T14:25Z; unstandardised `-B / a` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; the finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; `(-B / a) · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); p. 16 `TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; §7.2; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T16:21Z; unstandardised `B` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; the asymptotic standardisation `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; the finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `B · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); Table 3 `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_b · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` `p_0` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; p. 16; footnote 4; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T17:20Z; the affected variance is free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `t0_b` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TIPREDEFFECTstd` `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` is the continuous coefficient and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `t0_b · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `t0_b² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; p. 16; §7.2; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T18:20Z; `T0TIPREDEFFECT %*% TIPREDVAR %*% t(T0TIPREDEFFECT)` immediately after `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; form `t0_b` first, then square, then multiply by `v`; a zero coefficient or zero predictor variance is exactly zero; free `T0TIPREDEFFECT` does not require `a < 0`; `(B / a)² v` is `addedTIPREDVAR` and is not this first-occasion map; `t0_b · √v / √p_0` is `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` and is not this variance; free `T0VAR` is not this extra TI variance; `TRAITVAR` is not this extra TI variance; Equation 5 of 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `λ² t0_b² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5, p. 5; Table 3, p. 13; Table 2, p. 12; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T19:10Z; form `t0_b² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`; a zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero; `t0_b² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra; `λ² p_0 + θ` is first-occasion observed variance, not this extra; `λ² (B / a)² v` is Eq. 5 of `addedTIPREDVAR`, not this first-occasion observed extra; `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra; Equation 5 of §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `λ² (B / a)² v`; form `(B / a)² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`; a zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero; lasting asymptotic extra requires `a < 0`; `(B / a)² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra; `λ² t0_b² v` is first-occasion extra observed TI variance, not this extra; `λ² p + θ` is stationary observed variance, not this extra; `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra; p. 16 `TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `m · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` and strictly positive time-dependent predictor variance; unstandardised `M` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `TIPREDEFFECTstd` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd` even when `M = B`; intercept-style `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] M · √v / √p` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `m · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; Table 3 / p. 16 `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_m · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` and strictly positive TD predictor variance; unstandardised `t0_m` is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `TDPREDEFFECTstd` uses `asymDIFFUSION` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` even when `t0_m = t0_b`; `t0_m · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; free `T0VAR` does not require `a < 0`; p. 16 `T0VARstd` is `p_0 / p_0 = 1` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(T0VAR))) %&% T0VAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; default ridge is 0); unstandardised `T0VAR` is not `T0VARstd`; `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` is not `T0VARstd`; `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is not `T0VARstd`; p. 16 `TRAITVARstd` is `trait / trait = 1` after strictly positive `TRAITVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(TRAITVAR))) %&% TRAITVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; no ridge addend); unstandardised `TRAITVAR` is not `TRAITVARstd`; `T0VARstd` is not `TRAITVARstd` even when both equal 1; `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is not `TRAITVARstd`; p. 16 `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` is `ψ / ψ = 1` after strictly positive `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTTRAITVAR))) %&% MANIFESTTRAITVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0); unstandardised `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`; `TRAITVARstd` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` even when both equal 1; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`; p. 16 `MANIFESTVARstd` is `θ / θ = 1` after strictly positive `MANIFESTVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTVAR))) %&% MANIFESTVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; 2017-era `dimnames` assignment to `latentNames` is a source bug); unstandardised `MANIFESTVAR` is not `MANIFESTVARstd`; `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` is not `MANIFESTVARstd` even when both equal 1; Equation 5 `Var(y)` is not `MANIFESTVARstd`; p. 16 `TIPREDVARstd` is `v / v = 1` after strictly positive `TIPREDVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(TIPREDVAR))) %&% TIPREDVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `TIpredNames`); unstandardised `TIPREDVAR` is not `TIPREDVARstd`; `MANIFESTVARstd` is not `TIPREDVARstd` even when both equal 1; §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is not `TIPREDVARstd`; p. 16 `asymDIFFUSIONstd` is `p / p = 1` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` (`solve(sqrt(diag(asymDIFFUSION))) %&% asymDIFFUSION`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `latentNames`); unstandardised `asymDIFFUSION` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd`; `TIPREDVARstd` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd` even when both equal 1; `DIFFUSIONstd` `−2 a` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd`; p. 16 `discreteCINTstd` is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `discreteCINT` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `κ / √p` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `(-κ / a) / √p` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `asymCINTstd` is `(-κ / a) / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `asymCINT` is not `asymCINTstd`; `κ / √p` is not `asymCINTstd`; `discreteCINTstd` is not `asymCINTstd`; `T0MEANSstd` is `μ_0 / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR`; unstandardised `T0MEANS` is not `T0MEANSstd`; `T0VARstd` is not `T0MEANSstd`; `μ_0 / √asymDIFFUSION` is not `T0MEANSstd`; `MANIFESTMEANSstd` is `τ / √θ` after strictly positive `MANIFESTVAR`; unstandardised `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `MANIFESTMEANSstd`; `MANIFESTVARstd` is not `MANIFESTMEANSstd`; `τ / √(λ² Var(η) + θ)` is not `MANIFESTMEANSstd`; p. 16 `CINTstd` is `κ / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `CINT` is not `CINTstd`; `asymCINTstd` is not `CINTstd`; `discreteCINTstd` is not `CINTstd`; `κ / √(trait + p + added)` is not `CINTstd`;))))), irregular already-centered residual lag, Rubin `T` on OLS loadings, and strong-gated latent means (two-observation residual variance is identically `0` and caps at strong/scalar; Putnick & Bornstein, 2016) |
-| `psychometric_core` | posterior-aware structural input gates, CWC within/between OLS plus the contextual effect, event-time log-rate, unequal-interval discrete-lag remapping, constant-predictor discrete effect, time-varying-predictor discrete effect (Eq. 14), exact scalar discrete process noise (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3), lagged latent covariance and unconditional latent variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4), stationary within-subject variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 4 as `Δt → ∞`; `asymDIFFUSION`), trait-plus-state variance (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `TRAITVAR`; not process noise), observed-indicator variance and lagged observed covariance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5; Table 2 `MANIFESTVAR` is `Θ`, not `Var(y)`; `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not `MANIFESTVAR`; `Θ` does not enter lagged observed covariance; observed-indicator mean is `τ + λ μ`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y)`; `CINT` is not `MANIFESTMEANS`; discrete latent mean is `exp(a Δt) μ_0 + (exp(a Δt) − 1)/a κ`; `T0MEANS` is not `μ_t`; `CINT` is not the discrete increment; evolved observed mean is `τ + λ μ_t`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not `E(y_t)`; contemporaneous `TDPREDEFFECT` impulse is `m x`, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that contemporaneous impulse is `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; time-independent `TIPREDEFFECT` increment is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, not `M x`, not Voelkle Eq. 14, and not the coefficient `B`; Eq. 5 of that increment is `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`; within-interval `TDPREDEFFECT` carry is `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`, not the contemporaneous Dirac, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that carried observed mean when `u ≠ t`; first-occasion `T0TIPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_b z` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` (`T0TIPREDEFFECT` is not `TIPREDEFFECT` `B`; `t0_b z` is not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`; `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` is not `t0_b z`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean), first-occasion `T0TDPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_m x0` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` (`T0TDPREDEFFECT` is not `TDPREDEFFECT` `M`; `t0_m x0` is not `M x`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `t0_m x0`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`; `t0_m x0` is not `t0_b z`; an impulse at `u ≤ t0` that used `M` is already in `η(t0)` as `TDPREDEFFECT`, not as `T0TDPREDEFFECT`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_m x0)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` is not that observed mean; §7.2 level-change `CINT` is `κ = −a m x` with `a < 0` so `−κ / a = m x` (`−a m x` is not the dissipating Dirac, not a free `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not the extra near-zero-drift latent process also named in §7.2; Eq. 3 of that setting is `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, which is not `m x`, not `κ`, and not `TIPREDEFFECT`; §7.2 extra-process contribution is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)` (`ε = a` is `a_{ηξ} x Δt e^{a Δt}`; identification `TDPREDEFFECT` on the extra process is 1; printed extra `DRIFT` is `−0.000001`; not `κ = −a m x`, not `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, and not the dissipating Dirac `m x`; `ε ≥ 0` fails closed; Eq. 5 of that contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)`; the extra process has `LAMBDA` 0 and is not an observed indicator; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the contribution is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-contribution latent mean is not `E(y_t)`; after-t0 extra-process `TDPREDEFFECT` is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)` for `t0 < u < t` while `μ_t` uses `Δt`; Eq. 5 of that after-t0 contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)`; the first-occasion extra-process observed mean is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t0`; `e^{a(t−u)} m x` is a Dirac on the original process, not this `DRIFT` drive; §7.2 `asymTIPREDEFFECT` is `-B z / a` for `a < 0` (`-B z / a` is not the coefficient `B`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`; §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `(B / a)² v`, not `TRAITVAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`, and not `-B z / a`; Table 2 `asymCINT` is `-κ / a` for `a < 0` and is not `κ`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ`, not `T0MEANS`, and not `-B z / a`; p. 16 stationary `T0MEANS` is `-κ / a + −B z / a` and is not free `T0MEANS`, not `asymCINT` alone, not `asymTIPREDEFFECT` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent mean; Eq. 5 of that constrained mean is `τ + λ(−κ / a + −B z / a)`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(−κ / a)` is not that observed mean when `B z ≠ 0`; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_0)`; the constrained latent mean is not `E(y_0)`; stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v` (not free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION` alone, not `TRAITVAR` alone, not `addedTIPREDVAR` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent variance. Eq. 5 of that constrained variance is `λ²(trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` (JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T03:20Z; form the stationary latent variance first, then `λ² p + θ + ψ`; `λ² p_0` is not that observed variance; `λ²(−q / (2 a)) + θ` is not that observed variance when `TRAITVAR` or `addedTIPREDVAR` is nonzero; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_0)`; the constrained latent variance is not `Var(y_0)`); lagged stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay; contemporaneous `T0VAR` is not that lagged map; decaying the constrained total as if it were all state is not that lagged map; Eq. 5 of that lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v) + ψ`; `Θ` does not enter; contemporaneous `Var(y_0)` is not that lagged observed covariance; the lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance); later-occasion stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`; under stationarity that composition equals contemporaneous `T0VAR`; evolving the constrained total as if it were all state is not that later map; the lagged covariance omits `Q_Δt`; `Q_Δt` is not that later map; Eq. 5 of that later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; lagged observed covariance omits `Q_Δt` and `θ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`; the later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`); predetermined later-occasion `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (free `T0VAR` `p_0` is not that later map; setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary later-occasion map; stationary later variance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that later map when `p_0` is free; evolving `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` as if it were all state is not that later map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`; the predetermined later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`; stationary later observed variance is not that observed variance when `p_0` is free); predetermined lagged `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v` (free `T0VAR` `p_0` is not that lagged map; setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary lagged map; stationary lagged covariance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that lagged map when `p_0` is free; evolving `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` as if it were all state is not that lagged map; later-occasion variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that lagged map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v) + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` does not enter; the predetermined lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance; predetermined later observed variance includes `Q_Δt` and `θ` and is not that lagged observed covariance; stationary lagged observed covariance is not that observed covariance when `p_0` is free; the predetermined first-occasion variance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v`; free `p_0` is not that map; stationary first-occasion variance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that map when `p_0` is free; lagged covariance decays the state and is not that map; later-occasion variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined first-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not that first-occasion observed variance; the predetermined first-occasion latent variance is not that observed variance; stationary first-occasion observed variance is not that observed variance when `p_0` is free; predetermined later observed variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that first-occasion observed variance; later-start lagged covariance of predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `startoffset`; Eq. 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T10:27Z; first-occasion lagged omits `e^{a s} Q_u`; later-occasion variance does not lag; stationary lagged uses `−q / (2 a)`; decaying the later total is not that map; Eq. 5 of that later-start lagged covariance is `λ²` of it plus `ψ`; `Θ` does not enter; first-occasion lagged observed omits `e^{a s} Q_u`; later observed variance includes `Q_u` and `θ`; later-start later-occasion variance of predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + Q_s + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `startoffset`; Eq. 3–4 Chapman–Kolmogorov `Q_{u+s} = e^{2 a s} Q_u + Q_s`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T11:05Z; later-occasion variance at `u` omits `Q_s`; later-start lagged covariance omits `Q_s`; stationary later uses `−q / (2 a)`; evolving the later total as if it were all state is not that map; ignoring `startoffset` omits `e^{2 a s} Q_u`; Eq. 5 of that later-start later-occasion variance is `λ²` of it plus `θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not that observed variance; p. 16 `discreteDRIFTstd` is `e^{a Δt}` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4; unstandardised `e^{a Δt}` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`; the §7.1 trait-plus-state autocorrelation uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `discreteDIFFUSIONstd` is `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4; unstandardised `Q_Δt` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; the continuous standardisation `−2 a` is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; `Q_Δt / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `DIFFUSIONstd` is `q / (−q / (2 a)) = −2 a` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; Eq. 4; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T13:20Z; unstandardised `q` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; the discrete standardisation `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a))` depends on `Δt` and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; `q / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `DRIFTstd` is the continuous auto-effect after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; Eq. 1; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T13:28Z); unstandardised `a` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DRIFTstd`; the discrete standardisation `e^{a Δt}` depends on the event interval and is not `DRIFTstd`; `a p / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DRIFTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); p. 16 `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` is `(-B / a) · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; §7.2; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T14:25Z; unstandardised `-B / a` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; the finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; `(-B / a) · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); p. 16 `TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; §7.2; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T16:21Z; unstandardised `B` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; the asymptotic standardisation `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; the finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `B · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); Table 3 `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_b · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` `p_0` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; p. 16; footnote 4; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T17:20Z; the affected variance is free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `t0_b` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TIPREDEFFECTstd` `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` is the continuous coefficient and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `t0_b · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `t0_b² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; p. 16; §7.2; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T18:20Z; `T0TIPREDEFFECT %*% TIPREDVAR %*% t(T0TIPREDEFFECT)` immediately after `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; form `t0_b` first, then square, then multiply by `v`; a zero coefficient or zero predictor variance is exactly zero; free `T0TIPREDEFFECT` does not require `a < 0`; `(B / a)² v` is `addedTIPREDVAR` and is not this first-occasion map; `t0_b · √v / √p_0` is `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` and is not this variance; free `T0VAR` is not this extra TI variance; `TRAITVAR` is not this extra TI variance; Equation 5 of 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `λ² t0_b² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5, p. 5; Table 3, p. 13; Table 2, p. 12; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T19:10Z; form `t0_b² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`; a zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero; `t0_b² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra; `λ² p_0 + θ` is first-occasion observed variance, not this extra; `λ² (B / a)² v` is Eq. 5 of `addedTIPREDVAR`, not this first-occasion observed extra; `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra; Equation 5 of §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `λ² (B / a)² v`; form `(B / a)² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`; a zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero; lasting asymptotic extra requires `a < 0`; `(B / a)² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra; `λ² t0_b² v` is first-occasion extra observed TI variance, not this extra; `λ² p + θ` is stationary observed variance, not this extra; `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra; p. 16 `TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `m · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` and strictly positive time-dependent predictor variance; unstandardised `M` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `TIPREDEFFECTstd` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd` even when `M = B`; intercept-style `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] M · √v / √p` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `m · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; Table 3 / p. 16 `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_m · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` and strictly positive TD predictor variance; unstandardised `t0_m` is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `TDPREDEFFECTstd` uses `asymDIFFUSION` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` even when `t0_m = t0_b`; `t0_m · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; free `T0VAR` does not require `a < 0`; p. 16 `T0VARstd` is `p_0 / p_0 = 1` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(T0VAR))) %&% T0VAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; default ridge is 0); unstandardised `T0VAR` is not `T0VARstd`; `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` is not `T0VARstd`; `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is not `T0VARstd`; p. 16 `TRAITVARstd` is `trait / trait = 1` after strictly positive `TRAITVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(TRAITVAR))) %&% TRAITVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; no ridge addend); unstandardised `TRAITVAR` is not `TRAITVARstd`; `T0VARstd` is not `TRAITVARstd` even when both equal 1; `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is not `TRAITVARstd`; p. 16 `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` is `ψ / ψ = 1` after strictly positive `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTTRAITVAR))) %&% MANIFESTTRAITVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0); unstandardised `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`; `TRAITVARstd` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` even when both equal 1; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`; p. 16 `MANIFESTVARstd` is `θ / θ = 1` after strictly positive `MANIFESTVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTVAR))) %&% MANIFESTVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; 2017-era `dimnames` assignment to `latentNames` is a source bug); unstandardised `MANIFESTVAR` is not `MANIFESTVARstd`; `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` is not `MANIFESTVARstd` even when both equal 1; Equation 5 `Var(y)` is not `MANIFESTVARstd`; p. 16 `TIPREDVARstd` is `v / v = 1` after strictly positive `TIPREDVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(TIPREDVAR))) %&% TIPREDVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `TIpredNames`); unstandardised `TIPREDVAR` is not `TIPREDVARstd`; `MANIFESTVARstd` is not `TIPREDVARstd` even when both equal 1; §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is not `TIPREDVARstd`; p. 16 `asymDIFFUSIONstd` is `p / p = 1` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` (`solve(sqrt(diag(asymDIFFUSION))) %&% asymDIFFUSION`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `latentNames`); unstandardised `asymDIFFUSION` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd`; `TIPREDVARstd` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd` even when both equal 1; `DIFFUSIONstd` `−2 a` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd`; p. 16 `discreteCINTstd` is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `discreteCINT` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `κ / √p` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `(-κ / a) / √p` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `asymCINTstd` is `(-κ / a) / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `asymCINT` is not `asymCINTstd`; `κ / √p` is not `asymCINTstd`; `discreteCINTstd` is not `asymCINTstd`; `T0MEANSstd` is `μ_0 / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR`; unstandardised `T0MEANS` is not `T0MEANSstd`; `T0VARstd` is not `T0MEANSstd`; `μ_0 / √asymDIFFUSION` is not `T0MEANSstd`;))))), irregular already-centered residual lag, Rubin `T` on OLS loadings, and strong-gated latent means (two-observation residual variance is identically `0` and caps at strong/scalar; Putnick & Bornstein, 2016) |
+| `psychometric_core` | posterior-aware structural input gates, CWC within/between OLS plus the contextual effect, event-time log-rate, unequal-interval discrete-lag remapping, constant-predictor discrete effect, time-varying-predictor discrete effect (Eq. 14), exact scalar discrete process noise (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3), lagged latent covariance and unconditional latent variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4), stationary within-subject variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 4 as `Δt → ∞`; `asymDIFFUSION`), trait-plus-state variance (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `TRAITVAR`; not process noise), observed-indicator variance and lagged observed covariance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5; Table 2 `MANIFESTVAR` is `Θ`, not `Var(y)`; `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not `MANIFESTVAR`; `Θ` does not enter lagged observed covariance; observed-indicator mean is `τ + λ μ`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y)`; `CINT` is not `MANIFESTMEANS`; discrete latent mean is `exp(a Δt) μ_0 + (exp(a Δt) − 1)/a κ`; `T0MEANS` is not `μ_t`; `CINT` is not the discrete increment; evolved observed mean is `τ + λ μ_t`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not `E(y_t)`; contemporaneous `TDPREDEFFECT` impulse is `m x`, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that contemporaneous impulse is `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; time-independent `TIPREDEFFECT` increment is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, not `M x`, not Voelkle Eq. 14, and not the coefficient `B`; Eq. 5 of that increment is `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`; within-interval `TDPREDEFFECT` carry is `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`, not the contemporaneous Dirac, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that carried observed mean when `u ≠ t`; first-occasion `T0TIPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_b z` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` (`T0TIPREDEFFECT` is not `TIPREDEFFECT` `B`; `t0_b z` is not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`; `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` is not `t0_b z`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean), first-occasion `T0TDPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_m x0` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` (`T0TDPREDEFFECT` is not `TDPREDEFFECT` `M`; `t0_m x0` is not `M x`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `t0_m x0`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`; `t0_m x0` is not `t0_b z`; an impulse at `u ≤ t0` that used `M` is already in `η(t0)` as `TDPREDEFFECT`, not as `T0TDPREDEFFECT`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_m x0)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` is not that observed mean; §7.2 level-change `CINT` is `κ = −a m x` with `a < 0` so `−κ / a = m x` (`−a m x` is not the dissipating Dirac, not a free `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not the extra near-zero-drift latent process also named in §7.2; Eq. 3 of that setting is `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, which is not `m x`, not `κ`, and not `TIPREDEFFECT`; §7.2 extra-process contribution is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)` (`ε = a` is `a_{ηξ} x Δt e^{a Δt}`; identification `TDPREDEFFECT` on the extra process is 1; printed extra `DRIFT` is `−0.000001`; not `κ = −a m x`, not `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, and not the dissipating Dirac `m x`; `ε ≥ 0` fails closed; Eq. 5 of that contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)`; the extra process has `LAMBDA` 0 and is not an observed indicator; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the contribution is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-contribution latent mean is not `E(y_t)`; after-t0 extra-process `TDPREDEFFECT` is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)` for `t0 < u < t` while `μ_t` uses `Δt`; Eq. 5 of that after-t0 contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)`; the first-occasion extra-process observed mean is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t0`; `e^{a(t−u)} m x` is a Dirac on the original process, not this `DRIFT` drive; §7.2 `asymTIPREDEFFECT` is `-B z / a` for `a < 0` (`-B z / a` is not the coefficient `B`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`; §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `(B / a)² v`, not `TRAITVAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`, and not `-B z / a`; Table 2 `asymCINT` is `-κ / a` for `a < 0` and is not `κ`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ`, not `T0MEANS`, and not `-B z / a`; p. 16 stationary `T0MEANS` is `-κ / a + −B z / a` and is not free `T0MEANS`, not `asymCINT` alone, not `asymTIPREDEFFECT` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent mean; Eq. 5 of that constrained mean is `τ + λ(−κ / a + −B z / a)`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(−κ / a)` is not that observed mean when `B z ≠ 0`; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_0)`; the constrained latent mean is not `E(y_0)`; stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v` (not free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION` alone, not `TRAITVAR` alone, not `addedTIPREDVAR` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent variance. Eq. 5 of that constrained variance is `λ²(trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` (JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T03:20Z; form the stationary latent variance first, then `λ² p + θ + ψ`; `λ² p_0` is not that observed variance; `λ²(−q / (2 a)) + θ` is not that observed variance when `TRAITVAR` or `addedTIPREDVAR` is nonzero; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_0)`; the constrained latent variance is not `Var(y_0)`); lagged stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay; contemporaneous `T0VAR` is not that lagged map; decaying the constrained total as if it were all state is not that lagged map; Eq. 5 of that lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v) + ψ`; `Θ` does not enter; contemporaneous `Var(y_0)` is not that lagged observed covariance; the lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance); later-occasion stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`; under stationarity that composition equals contemporaneous `T0VAR`; evolving the constrained total as if it were all state is not that later map; the lagged covariance omits `Q_Δt`; `Q_Δt` is not that later map; Eq. 5 of that later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; lagged observed covariance omits `Q_Δt` and `θ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`; the later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`); predetermined later-occasion `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (free `T0VAR` `p_0` is not that later map; setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary later-occasion map; stationary later variance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that later map when `p_0` is free; evolving `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` as if it were all state is not that later map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`; the predetermined later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`; stationary later observed variance is not that observed variance when `p_0` is free); predetermined lagged `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v` (free `T0VAR` `p_0` is not that lagged map; setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary lagged map; stationary lagged covariance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that lagged map when `p_0` is free; evolving `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` as if it were all state is not that lagged map; later-occasion variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that lagged map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v) + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` does not enter; the predetermined lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance; predetermined later observed variance includes `Q_Δt` and `θ` and is not that lagged observed covariance; stationary lagged observed covariance is not that observed covariance when `p_0` is free; the predetermined first-occasion variance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v`; free `p_0` is not that map; stationary first-occasion variance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that map when `p_0` is free; lagged covariance decays the state and is not that map; later-occasion variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined first-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not that first-occasion observed variance; the predetermined first-occasion latent variance is not that observed variance; stationary first-occasion observed variance is not that observed variance when `p_0` is free; predetermined later observed variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that first-occasion observed variance; later-start lagged covariance of predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `startoffset`; Eq. 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T10:27Z; first-occasion lagged omits `e^{a s} Q_u`; later-occasion variance does not lag; stationary lagged uses `−q / (2 a)`; decaying the later total is not that map; Eq. 5 of that later-start lagged covariance is `λ²` of it plus `ψ`; `Θ` does not enter; first-occasion lagged observed omits `e^{a s} Q_u`; later observed variance includes `Q_u` and `θ`; later-start later-occasion variance of predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + Q_s + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `startoffset`; Eq. 3–4 Chapman–Kolmogorov `Q_{u+s} = e^{2 a s} Q_u + Q_s`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T11:05Z; later-occasion variance at `u` omits `Q_s`; later-start lagged covariance omits `Q_s`; stationary later uses `−q / (2 a)`; evolving the later total as if it were all state is not that map; ignoring `startoffset` omits `e^{2 a s} Q_u`; Eq. 5 of that later-start later-occasion variance is `λ²` of it plus `θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not that observed variance; p. 16 `discreteDRIFTstd` is `e^{a Δt}` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4; unstandardised `e^{a Δt}` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`; the §7.1 trait-plus-state autocorrelation uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `discreteDIFFUSIONstd` is `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4; unstandardised `Q_Δt` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; the continuous standardisation `−2 a` is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; `Q_Δt / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `DIFFUSIONstd` is `q / (−q / (2 a)) = −2 a` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; Eq. 4; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T13:20Z; unstandardised `q` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; the discrete standardisation `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a))` depends on `Δt` and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; `q / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `DRIFTstd` is the continuous auto-effect after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; Eq. 1; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T13:28Z); unstandardised `a` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DRIFTstd`; the discrete standardisation `e^{a Δt}` depends on the event interval and is not `DRIFTstd`; `a p / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DRIFTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); p. 16 `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` is `(-B / a) · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; §7.2; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T14:25Z; unstandardised `-B / a` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; the finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; `(-B / a) · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); p. 16 `TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; §7.2; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T16:21Z; unstandardised `B` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; the asymptotic standardisation `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; the finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `B · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); Table 3 `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_b · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` `p_0` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; p. 16; footnote 4; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T17:20Z; the affected variance is free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `t0_b` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TIPREDEFFECTstd` `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` is the continuous coefficient and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `t0_b · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `t0_b² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; p. 16; §7.2; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T18:20Z; `T0TIPREDEFFECT %*% TIPREDVAR %*% t(T0TIPREDEFFECT)` immediately after `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; form `t0_b` first, then square, then multiply by `v`; a zero coefficient or zero predictor variance is exactly zero; free `T0TIPREDEFFECT` does not require `a < 0`; `(B / a)² v` is `addedTIPREDVAR` and is not this first-occasion map; `t0_b · √v / √p_0` is `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` and is not this variance; free `T0VAR` is not this extra TI variance; `TRAITVAR` is not this extra TI variance; Equation 5 of 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `λ² t0_b² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5, p. 5; Table 3, p. 13; Table 2, p. 12; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T19:10Z; form `t0_b² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`; a zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero; `t0_b² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra; `λ² p_0 + θ` is first-occasion observed variance, not this extra; `λ² (B / a)² v` is Eq. 5 of `addedTIPREDVAR`, not this first-occasion observed extra; `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra; Equation 5 of §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `λ² (B / a)² v`; form `(B / a)² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`; a zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero; lasting asymptotic extra requires `a < 0`; `(B / a)² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra; `λ² t0_b² v` is first-occasion extra observed TI variance, not this extra; `λ² p + θ` is stationary observed variance, not this extra; `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra; p. 16 `TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `m · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` and strictly positive time-dependent predictor variance; unstandardised `M` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `TIPREDEFFECTstd` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd` even when `M = B`; intercept-style `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] M · √v / √p` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `m · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; Table 3 / p. 16 `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_m · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` and strictly positive TD predictor variance; unstandardised `t0_m` is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `TDPREDEFFECTstd` uses `asymDIFFUSION` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` even when `t0_m = t0_b`; `t0_m · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; free `T0VAR` does not require `a < 0`; p. 16 `T0VARstd` is `p_0 / p_0 = 1` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(T0VAR))) %&% T0VAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; default ridge is 0); unstandardised `T0VAR` is not `T0VARstd`; `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` is not `T0VARstd`; `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is not `T0VARstd`; p. 16 `TRAITVARstd` is `trait / trait = 1` after strictly positive `TRAITVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(TRAITVAR))) %&% TRAITVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; no ridge addend); unstandardised `TRAITVAR` is not `TRAITVARstd`; `T0VARstd` is not `TRAITVARstd` even when both equal 1; `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is not `TRAITVARstd`; p. 16 `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` is `ψ / ψ = 1` after strictly positive `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTTRAITVAR))) %&% MANIFESTTRAITVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0); unstandardised `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`; `TRAITVARstd` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` even when both equal 1; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`; p. 16 `MANIFESTVARstd` is `θ / θ = 1` after strictly positive `MANIFESTVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTVAR))) %&% MANIFESTVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; 2017-era `dimnames` assignment to `latentNames` is a source bug); unstandardised `MANIFESTVAR` is not `MANIFESTVARstd`; `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` is not `MANIFESTVARstd` even when both equal 1; Equation 5 `Var(y)` is not `MANIFESTVARstd`; p. 16 `TIPREDVARstd` is `v / v = 1` after strictly positive `TIPREDVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(TIPREDVAR))) %&% TIPREDVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `TIpredNames`); unstandardised `TIPREDVAR` is not `TIPREDVARstd`; `MANIFESTVARstd` is not `TIPREDVARstd` even when both equal 1; §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is not `TIPREDVARstd`; p. 16 `asymDIFFUSIONstd` is `p / p = 1` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` (`solve(sqrt(diag(asymDIFFUSION))) %&% asymDIFFUSION`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `latentNames`); unstandardised `asymDIFFUSION` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd`; `TIPREDVARstd` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd` even when both equal 1; `DIFFUSIONstd` `−2 a` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd`; p. 16 `discreteCINTstd` is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `discreteCINT` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `κ / √p` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `(-κ / a) / √p` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `asymCINTstd` is `(-κ / a) / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `asymCINT` is not `asymCINTstd`; `κ / √p` is not `asymCINTstd`; `discreteCINTstd` is not `asymCINTstd`; `T0MEANSstd` is `μ_0 / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR`; unstandardised `T0MEANS` is not `T0MEANSstd`; `T0VARstd` is not `T0MEANSstd`; `μ_0 / √asymDIFFUSION` is not `T0MEANSstd`; `MANIFESTMEANSstd` is `τ / √θ` after strictly positive `MANIFESTVAR`; unstandardised `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `MANIFESTMEANSstd`; `MANIFESTVARstd` is not `MANIFESTMEANSstd`; `τ / √(λ² Var(η) + θ)` is not `MANIFESTMEANSstd`; p. 16 `CINTstd` is `κ / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `CINT` is not `CINTstd`; `asymCINTstd` is not `CINTstd`; `discreteCINTstd` is not `CINTstd`; `κ / √(trait + p + added)` is not `CINTstd`;))))), Hamaker Eq. 1a occasion-mean residual lag (not within-person; not RI-CLPM), irregular already-centered residual lag, Rubin `T` on OLS loadings, and strong-gated latent means (two-observation residual variance is identically `0` and caps at strong/scalar; Putnick & Bornstein, 2016) |
+| `psychometric_core` | posterior-aware structural input gates, CWC within/between OLS plus the contextual effect, event-time log-rate, unequal-interval discrete-lag remapping, constant-predictor discrete effect, time-varying-predictor discrete effect (Eq. 14), exact scalar discrete process noise (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3), lagged latent covariance and unconditional latent variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4), stationary within-subject variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 4 as `Δt → ∞`; `asymDIFFUSION`), trait-plus-state variance (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `TRAITVAR`; not process noise), observed-indicator variance and lagged observed covariance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5; Table 2 `MANIFESTVAR` is `Θ`, not `Var(y)`; `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not `MANIFESTVAR`; `Θ` does not enter lagged observed covariance; observed-indicator mean is `τ + λ μ`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y)`; `CINT` is not `MANIFESTMEANS`; discrete latent mean is `exp(a Δt) μ_0 + (exp(a Δt) − 1)/a κ`; `T0MEANS` is not `μ_t`; `CINT` is not the discrete increment; evolved observed mean is `τ + λ μ_t`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not `E(y_t)`; contemporaneous `TDPREDEFFECT` impulse is `m x`, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that contemporaneous impulse is `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; time-independent `TIPREDEFFECT` increment is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, not `M x`, not Voelkle Eq. 14, and not the coefficient `B`; Eq. 5 of that increment is `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`; within-interval `TDPREDEFFECT` carry is `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`, not the contemporaneous Dirac, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that carried observed mean when `u ≠ t`; first-occasion `T0TIPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_b z` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` (`T0TIPREDEFFECT` is not `TIPREDEFFECT` `B`; `t0_b z` is not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`; `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` is not `t0_b z`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean), first-occasion `T0TDPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_m x0` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` (`T0TDPREDEFFECT` is not `TDPREDEFFECT` `M`; `t0_m x0` is not `M x`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `t0_m x0`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`; `t0_m x0` is not `t0_b z`; an impulse at `u ≤ t0` that used `M` is already in `η(t0)` as `TDPREDEFFECT`, not as `T0TDPREDEFFECT`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_m x0)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` is not that observed mean; §7.2 level-change `CINT` is `κ = −a m x` with `a < 0` so `−κ / a = m x` (`−a m x` is not the dissipating Dirac, not a free `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not the extra near-zero-drift latent process also named in §7.2; Eq. 3 of that setting is `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, which is not `m x`, not `κ`, and not `TIPREDEFFECT`; §7.2 extra-process contribution is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)` (`ε = a` is `a_{ηξ} x Δt e^{a Δt}`; identification `TDPREDEFFECT` on the extra process is 1; printed extra `DRIFT` is `−0.000001`; not `κ = −a m x`, not `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, and not the dissipating Dirac `m x`; `ε ≥ 0` fails closed; Eq. 5 of that contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)`; the extra process has `LAMBDA` 0 and is not an observed indicator; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the contribution is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-contribution latent mean is not `E(y_t)`; after-t0 extra-process `TDPREDEFFECT` is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)` for `t0 < u < t` while `μ_t` uses `Δt`; Eq. 5 of that after-t0 contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)`; the first-occasion extra-process observed mean is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t0`; `e^{a(t−u)} m x` is a Dirac on the original process, not this `DRIFT` drive; §7.2 `asymTIPREDEFFECT` is `-B z / a` for `a < 0` (`-B z / a` is not the coefficient `B`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`; §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `(B / a)² v`, not `TRAITVAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`, and not `-B z / a`; Table 2 `asymCINT` is `-κ / a` for `a < 0` and is not `κ`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ`, not `T0MEANS`, and not `-B z / a`; p. 16 stationary `T0MEANS` is `-κ / a + −B z / a` and is not free `T0MEANS`, not `asymCINT` alone, not `asymTIPREDEFFECT` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent mean; Eq. 5 of that constrained mean is `τ + λ(−κ / a + −B z / a)`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(−κ / a)` is not that observed mean when `B z ≠ 0`; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_0)`; the constrained latent mean is not `E(y_0)`; stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v` (not free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION` alone, not `TRAITVAR` alone, not `addedTIPREDVAR` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent variance. Eq. 5 of that constrained variance is `λ²(trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` (JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T03:20Z; form the stationary latent variance first, then `λ² p + θ + ψ`; `λ² p_0` is not that observed variance; `λ²(−q / (2 a)) + θ` is not that observed variance when `TRAITVAR` or `addedTIPREDVAR` is nonzero; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_0)`; the constrained latent variance is not `Var(y_0)`); lagged stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay; contemporaneous `T0VAR` is not that lagged map; decaying the constrained total as if it were all state is not that lagged map; Eq. 5 of that lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v) + ψ`; `Θ` does not enter; contemporaneous `Var(y_0)` is not that lagged observed covariance; the lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance); later-occasion stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`; under stationarity that composition equals contemporaneous `T0VAR`; evolving the constrained total as if it were all state is not that later map; the lagged covariance omits `Q_Δt`; `Q_Δt` is not that later map; Eq. 5 of that later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; lagged observed covariance omits `Q_Δt` and `θ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`; the later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`); predetermined later-occasion `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (free `T0VAR` `p_0` is not that later map; setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary later-occasion map; stationary later variance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that later map when `p_0` is free; evolving `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` as if it were all state is not that later map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`; the predetermined later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`; stationary later observed variance is not that observed variance when `p_0` is free); predetermined lagged `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v` (free `T0VAR` `p_0` is not that lagged map; setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary lagged map; stationary lagged covariance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that lagged map when `p_0` is free; evolving `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` as if it were all state is not that lagged map; later-occasion variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that lagged map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v) + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` does not enter; the predetermined lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance; predetermined later observed variance includes `Q_Δt` and `θ` and is not that lagged observed covariance; stationary lagged observed covariance is not that observed covariance when `p_0` is free; the predetermined first-occasion variance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v`; free `p_0` is not that map; stationary first-occasion variance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that map when `p_0` is free; lagged covariance decays the state and is not that map; later-occasion variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined first-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not that first-occasion observed variance; the predetermined first-occasion latent variance is not that observed variance; stationary first-occasion observed variance is not that observed variance when `p_0` is free; predetermined later observed variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that first-occasion observed variance; later-start lagged covariance of predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `startoffset`; Eq. 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T10:27Z; first-occasion lagged omits `e^{a s} Q_u`; later-occasion variance does not lag; stationary lagged uses `−q / (2 a)`; decaying the later total is not that map; Eq. 5 of that later-start lagged covariance is `λ²` of it plus `ψ`; `Θ` does not enter; first-occasion lagged observed omits `e^{a s} Q_u`; later observed variance includes `Q_u` and `θ`; later-start later-occasion variance of predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + Q_s + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `startoffset`; Eq. 3–4 Chapman–Kolmogorov `Q_{u+s} = e^{2 a s} Q_u + Q_s`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T11:05Z; later-occasion variance at `u` omits `Q_s`; later-start lagged covariance omits `Q_s`; stationary later uses `−q / (2 a)`; evolving the later total as if it were all state is not that map; ignoring `startoffset` omits `e^{2 a s} Q_u`; Eq. 5 of that later-start later-occasion variance is `λ²` of it plus `θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not that observed variance; p. 16 `discreteDRIFTstd` is `e^{a Δt}` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4; unstandardised `e^{a Δt}` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`; the §7.1 trait-plus-state autocorrelation uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `discreteDIFFUSIONstd` is `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4; unstandardised `Q_Δt` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; the continuous standardisation `−2 a` is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; `Q_Δt / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `DIFFUSIONstd` is `q / (−q / (2 a)) = −2 a` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; Eq. 4; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T13:20Z; unstandardised `q` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; the discrete standardisation `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a))` depends on `Δt` and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; `q / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `DRIFTstd` is the continuous auto-effect after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; Eq. 1; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T13:28Z); unstandardised `a` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DRIFTstd`; the discrete standardisation `e^{a Δt}` depends on the event interval and is not `DRIFTstd`; `a p / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DRIFTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); p. 16 `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` is `(-B / a) · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; §7.2; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T14:25Z; unstandardised `-B / a` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; the finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; `(-B / a) · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); p. 16 `TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; §7.2; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T16:21Z; unstandardised `B` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; the asymptotic standardisation `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; the finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `B · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); Table 3 `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_b · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` `p_0` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; p. 16; footnote 4; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T17:20Z; the affected variance is free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `t0_b` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TIPREDEFFECTstd` `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` is the continuous coefficient and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `t0_b · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `t0_b² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; p. 16; §7.2; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T18:20Z; `T0TIPREDEFFECT %*% TIPREDVAR %*% t(T0TIPREDEFFECT)` immediately after `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; form `t0_b` first, then square, then multiply by `v`; a zero coefficient or zero predictor variance is exactly zero; free `T0TIPREDEFFECT` does not require `a < 0`; `(B / a)² v` is `addedTIPREDVAR` and is not this first-occasion map; `t0_b · √v / √p_0` is `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` and is not this variance; free `T0VAR` is not this extra TI variance; `TRAITVAR` is not this extra TI variance; Equation 5 of 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `λ² t0_b² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5, p. 5; Table 3, p. 13; Table 2, p. 12; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T19:10Z; form `t0_b² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`; a zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero; `t0_b² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra; `λ² p_0 + θ` is first-occasion observed variance, not this extra; `λ² (B / a)² v` is Eq. 5 of `addedTIPREDVAR`, not this first-occasion observed extra; `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra; Equation 5 of §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `λ² (B / a)² v`; form `(B / a)² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`; a zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero; lasting asymptotic extra requires `a < 0`; `(B / a)² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra; `λ² t0_b² v` is first-occasion extra observed TI variance, not this extra; `λ² p + θ` is stationary observed variance, not this extra; `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra; p. 16 `TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `m · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` and strictly positive time-dependent predictor variance; unstandardised `M` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `TIPREDEFFECTstd` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd` even when `M = B`; intercept-style `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] M · √v / √p` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `m · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; Table 3 / p. 16 `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_m · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` and strictly positive TD predictor variance; unstandardised `t0_m` is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `TDPREDEFFECTstd` uses `asymDIFFUSION` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` even when `t0_m = t0_b`; `t0_m · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; free `T0VAR` does not require `a < 0`; p. 16 `T0VARstd` is `p_0 / p_0 = 1` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(T0VAR))) %&% T0VAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; default ridge is 0); unstandardised `T0VAR` is not `T0VARstd`; `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` is not `T0VARstd`; `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is not `T0VARstd`; p. 16 `TRAITVARstd` is `trait / trait = 1` after strictly positive `TRAITVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(TRAITVAR))) %&% TRAITVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; no ridge addend); unstandardised `TRAITVAR` is not `TRAITVARstd`; `T0VARstd` is not `TRAITVARstd` even when both equal 1; `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is not `TRAITVARstd`; p. 16 `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` is `ψ / ψ = 1` after strictly positive `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTTRAITVAR))) %&% MANIFESTTRAITVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0); unstandardised `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`; `TRAITVARstd` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` even when both equal 1; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`; p. 16 `MANIFESTVARstd` is `θ / θ = 1` after strictly positive `MANIFESTVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTVAR))) %&% MANIFESTVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; 2017-era `dimnames` assignment to `latentNames` is a source bug); unstandardised `MANIFESTVAR` is not `MANIFESTVARstd`; `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` is not `MANIFESTVARstd` even when both equal 1; Equation 5 `Var(y)` is not `MANIFESTVARstd`; p. 16 `TIPREDVARstd` is `v / v = 1` after strictly positive `TIPREDVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(TIPREDVAR))) %&% TIPREDVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `TIpredNames`); unstandardised `TIPREDVAR` is not `TIPREDVARstd`; `MANIFESTVARstd` is not `TIPREDVARstd` even when both equal 1; §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is not `TIPREDVARstd`; p. 16 `asymDIFFUSIONstd` is `p / p = 1` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` (`solve(sqrt(diag(asymDIFFUSION))) %&% asymDIFFUSION`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `latentNames`); unstandardised `asymDIFFUSION` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd`; `TIPREDVARstd` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd` even when both equal 1; `DIFFUSIONstd` `−2 a` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd`; p. 16 `discreteCINTstd` is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `discreteCINT` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `κ / √p` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `(-κ / a) / √p` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `asymCINTstd` is `(-κ / a) / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `asymCINT` is not `asymCINTstd`; `κ / √p` is not `asymCINTstd`; `discreteCINTstd` is not `asymCINTstd`; `T0MEANSstd` is `μ_0 / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR`; unstandardised `T0MEANS` is not `T0MEANSstd`; `T0VARstd` is not `T0MEANSstd`; `μ_0 / √asymDIFFUSION` is not `T0MEANSstd`;))))), Hamaker Eq. 1a occasion-mean residual lag (not within-person; not RI-CLPM), irregular already-centered residual lag, Rubin `T` on OLS loadings, and strong-gated latent means (two-observation residual variance is identically `0` and caps at strong/scalar; Putnick & Bornstein, 2016) |
 
 
 Foundation crates expose only tested contracts. Empty façades are not public
diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md
index 062a69412..e3409e08e 100644
--- a/CHANGELOG.md
+++ b/CHANGELOG.md
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ All notable changes to TEPP are documented here. The format follows Keep a Chang
 
 ## [Unreleased]
 
+- `psychometric_core` recovers Hamaker, Kuiper, and Grasman (2015, Eq. 1a–1d; UvA-DARE PDF opened 2026-09-03T06:07Z KST from https://dare.uva.nl) occasion-mean-centered event-time lags. The CLPM measurement equation is `x_it = μ_t + p_it` where `μ_t` is the grand mean at occasion `t`, not the sample-wide grand mean and not the person mean. The temporal deviations `p_it` still contain trait-like between-person differences; lagged relations on those residuals are not within-person. This slice forms `p_it` on aligned event-time waves, maps consecutive residuals through the exact scalar log-rate `a = ln(p_{i,t}/p_{i,t-1}) / Δt` (Voelkle et al., 2012, Eq. 7), and refuses treating that rate as a within-person lag. Consecutive aligned waves may have unequal spacing. Unaligned event times have no shared occasion and fail closed. This is not RI-CLPM (Hamaker et al., 2015, Eq. 3a), not DSEM, not CWC, and not the open `#332` sample-grand-mean lag. Meredith (1993) remains unread (Unpaywall 2026-09-03T06:07Z KST: `is_oa: false`). Mislevy (1991, *Psychometrika, 56*, 177–196) remains unread on the same terms (DOI `10.1007/bf02294457`; Unpaywall `is_oa: false`).
+
 - `event_core` adds bounded Allen interval-consistency classification, atomic path-consistency closure, contradiction/resource refusals, and an explicit dependency-error fallback without claiming unrestricted global satisfiability.
 
 - `psychometric_core` recovers the Driver, Oud, and Voelkle (2017, Table 2, p. 12 `MANIFESTTRAITVAR`; §7.1, p. 19; p. 16 `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`; footnote 4; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-27T14:20Z from https://www.jstatsoft.org/index.php/jss/article/download/v077i05/1104) scalar standardised manifest-trait variance on current main after `0ce16e8` dropped the pre-consolidation code while research notes already named the map (register items 83–84). Table 2 names `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` `Ψ_τ` the additional time-invariant variance-covariance on the measurement level and sets it `NULL` when there is no manifest trait. Equation 5 writes `Γ ~ N(τ, Ψ)` and names that covariance the manifest traits. Section 7.1 names manifest traits stable individual differences in indicator levels, distinct from process-level `TRAITVAR` `φ_ξ`. Page 16 prints standardised matrices with the suffix `std` when appropriate. The printed example on p. 16 is `discreteDRIFTstd`, not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`. Footnote 4 standardises using only the relevant variance, not the total. The relevant variance for that named indicator-level correlation is `MANIFESTTRAITVAR`, not process-level `TRAITVAR` and not residual `MANIFESTVAR` `θ`. The 2017-era source forms `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` only when `MANIFESTTRAITVAR != 0`, as `solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTTRAITVAR) + ridging)) %&% MANIFESTTRAITVAR` when `verbose = TRUE`. OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`. Unlike `TRAITVARstd`, that formation adds `diag(c(ridging), n.manifest)`. The default `ridging = FALSE` adds 0, not `0.0001`; that ridge is a numerical hack and is not this exact map. The scalar correlation is `ψ / ψ = 1` after strictly positive `MANIFESTTRAITVAR`. Form strictly positive `ψ` first, then `1 / √ψ`, then `(1 / √ψ) ψ (1 / √ψ)`. Unstandardised `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is defined for a zero trait; standardised `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not. Zero `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` skips forming `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` in the 2017-era source and fails closed here. Indicator-level trait variance is an event-time structural quantity, so a non-event clock fails closed. `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` does not require stable `a < 0`. Distinct positive `ψ` recover the same 1. `trait / trait = 1` is `TRAITVARstd` and recovers the same number and remains a distinct named quantity. `θ` is `MANIFESTVAR` and is measurement error, not this correlation. Meredith (1993) remains unread (web search 2026-08-27T14:20Z: Springer/Cambridge Core paywalled; Unpaywall historically `is_oa: false`; Springer `content/pdf` is an HTML stub). Mislevy (1991, *Psychometrika, 56*, 177–196) remains unread on the same terms (DOI `10.1007/bf02294457`). Still not a Kalman filter, not a matrix `expm`, not ESEM estimation, not DSEM, and not ctsem estimation.
diff --git a/CLAUDE.md b/CLAUDE.md
index 339692cf0..fb9bab00e 100644
--- a/CLAUDE.md
+++ b/CLAUDE.md
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Read and follow `AGENTS.md` before changing this repository. The repository-wide
 - Do not treat raw topic proportions as ordinary Euclidean indicators. Use logistic-normal coordinates or valid log-ratio coordinates and propagate posterior uncertainty into ESEM/DSEM.
 - Do not treat metric/weak invariance as a latent-mean license. Strong (equal loading and intercept) or strict is required; `#84` `metric` licenses shared metric meaning only. Putnick and Bornstein (2016, PMC5145197 opened 2026-08-19T22:15Z) require scalar invariance before latent-mean comparison; residual invariance is not a prerequisite. Two-observation series have no residual degrees of freedom (`ordinary_least_squares_fit` returns residual variance `0`) and cap at strong/scalar; they still license means. This is two-group OLS, not MGCFA. Meredith (1993) names remain unread labels (Unpaywall/OpenAlex 2026-08-25T11:32Z: closed).
 - Do not use the difference quotient as a continuous-time rate. The scalar map is `a = ln(φ) / Δt` on event time. Discrete lags from unequal event intervals are not one coefficient; remap them through that log-rate. Binary64 `exp(a Δt) = 0` is not a discrete lag. A constant predictor's discrete effect is Voelkle et al. (2012, Eq. 12), evaluated as `a_yx (expm1(z) / a_xx)` with `z = a_xx Δt` so a finite result is not lost when `z` overflows to `-∞` or when `a_yx Δt` overflows. When `expm1(z)` overflows at a finite `z`, rewrite in log space; a zero continuous effect is exactly zero; an overflowing `a_yx/a_xx` rewrite term fails closed. The first-order product is the underflow limit of that equation, not the general constant-predictor discrete effect. A time-varying predictor whose sampling interval equals its constancy interval uses Voelkle et al. (2012, Eq. 14): `b* = a_yx Δt`. Unmatched intervals fail closed (Oud & Jansen, 2000, unread). Discrete process noise is Driver et al. (2017, Eq. 3): `Q_Δt = 0.5 q (expm1(z) / a)` with `z = 2 (a Δt)` and `q = G G⊤ ≥ 0`; do not form `2 a` first; `a = 0` and `z → 0` recover `q Δt`; a zero diffusion is exactly zero; an overflowing rewrite scale `0.5 q / a` fails closed; this is not a Kalman filter. `Q_Δt` is `cov(η_t | η_{t-1})`, not `Var(η_t)`. The lagged covariance is `exp(a Δt) p` and the unconditional variance is `exp(2 a Δt) p + Q_Δt` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4, pp. 4–5; JSS has no numbered §2.2). A zero diffusion whose `2 (a Δt)` overflows to `+∞` is not a finite `Var(η_t)`. The stationary within-subject variance is the `Δt → ∞` limit of Eq. 4: `-q / (2 a)` for stable `a < 0` (JSS p. 16 `asymDIFFUSION`; §4.3). When `2 a` is finite, form `q / -(2 a)` so `q / a` overflow does not lose a finite result (`q = MAX`, `a = -0.75` → `MAX / 1.5`). When `2 a` overflows, form `(q / a) * -0.5`. Do not form `0.5 q` first (`q = from_bits(1)` underflows). `a ≥ 0` has no finite stationary variance. Finite-interval `Q_Δt` is not that limit. Trait-plus-state variance is `trait + state` and lagged covariance is `trait + exp(a Δt) p` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3, p. 9). Trait variance is not process noise and not `asymDIFFUSION`. Evolving the summed variance as if it were all state is not that map. This is not RI-CLPM. Observed-indicator variance is `λ² Var(η) + θ` when `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is zero and `λ² Var(η) + θ + ψ` otherwise (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5, p. 5; Table 2, p. 12). Lagged observed covariance is `λ² cov(η_t, η_{t-1}) + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` does not enter. Observed-indicator mean is `τ + λ μ` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5; Table 2, p. 12). `MANIFESTMEANS` is `τ`, not `E(y)`. `E(η)` is not `E(y)`. `CINT` is not `MANIFESTMEANS`. `T0MEANS` is not `E(y)`. The discrete latent mean is `μ_t = exp(a Δt) μ_0 + (exp(a Δt) − 1)/a κ` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3, p. 4; Table 2, p. 12). `T0MEANS` is not `μ_t`. `CINT` is not that discrete increment. A zero drift is `κ Δt`. Underflow of `exp(a Δt)` to `+0` drops the carried `T0MEANS` and keeps `−κ / a`. The evolved observed mean is `τ + λ μ_t` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of that Eq. 3 map). The first-occasion map `τ + λ μ_0` is not `E(y_t)`. `μ_t` is not `E(y_t)`. The contemporaneous time-dependent predictor impulse is `m x` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3 fourth summand; Table 2 `TDPREDEFFECT` is `M`). Form `μ_t` first, then add `m x`. `TDPREDEFFECT` is not `CINT`. `M x` is not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z` and is not Voelkle et al. (2012, Eq. 14). The §7.2 level-change form is not that impulse. The observed mean of that contemporaneous impulse is `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Eq. 3 fourth-summand composition). The evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean. The carry map `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`. The evolved-plus-impulse latent mean is not `E(y_t)`. The time-independent predictor increment is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3 second summand; Table 2 `TIPREDEFFECT` is `B`). Form `B z` first, then the discrete intercept map. A zero drift is `B z Δt`. `TIPREDEFFECT` is `B`, not that discrete increment. `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z` is not `CINT`, not `M x`, and not Voelkle et al. (2012, Eq. 14). The observed mean of that increment is `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Eq. 3 printed addend after the `T0MEANS` carry and the `CINT` increment). The evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean. The contemporaneous map `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean. The carry map `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`. The evolved-plus-increment latent mean is not `E(y_t)`. The within-interval time-dependent impulse carry is `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 1–2 Green-function integral of Eq. 2; §7.2 dissipation). Form `m x` first, then `e^{a(t−u)} m x`. A zero drift is `m x` with no dissipation. Underflow of `e^{a(t−u)}` to `+0` is vanishing dissipation and is kept. `e^{A(t−u)} M x` is not the contemporaneous Dirac, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle et al. (2012, Eq. 14). An impulse at `u = t` is the contemporaneous map. An impulse at `u ≤ t0` is already in `η(t0)`. The observed mean of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Eq. 1–2 carried latent mean). The evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean. The contemporaneous map `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`. `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_t)`. The carried latent mean is not `E(y_t)`. The first-occasion time-independent predictor shift is `t0_b z` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3 `T0TIPREDEFFECT`; Eq. 3 first summand). Form `t0_b z` first, then `e^{a Δt} t0_b z`. Form `μ_t` first, then add that carry. A zero drift is `t0_b z`. Underflow of `e^{a Δt}` to `+0` is a vanishing carry of the first-occasion shift and is kept. `t0_b z` is not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`. `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` is not `t0_b z`. `T0TIPREDEFFECT` is the coefficient, not the shift. The observed mean of that first-occasion carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Table 3 / Eq. 3 first-summand composition). The evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean. The process-increment map `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean. The contemporaneous map `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean. The impulse-carry map `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t0`. The evolved-plus-carry latent mean is not `E(y_t)`. The first-occasion time-dependent predictor shift is `t0_m x0` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3 `T0TDPREDEFFECT`; Eq. 3 first summand; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T19:10Z). Form `t0_m x0` first, then `e^{a Δt} t0_m x0`. Form `μ_t` first, then add that carry. A zero drift is `t0_m x0`. Underflow of `e^{a Δt}` to `+0` is a vanishing carry of the first-occasion shift and is kept. `t0_m x0` is not `M x`, not `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`, not `t0_b z`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, and not `CINT`. `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `t0_m x0`. `T0TDPREDEFFECT` is the coefficient, not the shift. An impulse at `u ≤ t0` that used `M` is already in `η(t0)` as `TDPREDEFFECT`, not as `T0TDPREDEFFECT`. The observed mean of that first-occasion TD carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_m x0)` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Table 3 / Eq. 3 first-summand TD composition; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T19:07Z). The evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean. The process-increment map `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean. The contemporaneous map `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean. The impulse-carry map `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t0`. The first-occasion TI map `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` is not that observed mean. The evolved-plus-carry latent mean is not `E(y_t)`. The lasting level-change `CINT` is `κ = −a m x` (Driver et al., 2017, §7.2, pp. 20–21; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T19:45Z). Form `m x` first, then multiply by `−a`. Stable `a < 0` is required so `−κ / a = m x` is an equilibrium offset. `a ≥ 0` cannot hold a new process mean. `−a m x` is not the dissipating Dirac `m x`, not a free `CINT`, and not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`. The extra near-zero-drift latent process also named in §7.2 is a different specification and is not this `CINT` setting. Equation 3 maps that intercept as `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x` (JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T19:50Z). Form the level-change `CINT` first, then the discrete intercept map. Underflow of `e^{a Δt}` to `+0` keeps `m x`. `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x` is not `m x`, not `κ`, and not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`. The printed §7.2 lasting level change is an extra near-zero-drift latent process (Driver et al., 2017, §7.2, pp. 22–23; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T23:10Z). `T0MEANS`, `CINT`, `T0VAR`, `DIFFUSION`, and `TRAITVAR` of that process are fixed to 0; `TDPREDEFFECT` on it is fixed to 1; its `DRIFT` diagonal is very close to 0 (printed example `−0.000001`; precisely 0 causes computational problems); the original process is driven by the `DRIFT` coupling `a_{ηξ}`. After a unit identification impulse the scalar contribution is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)` (`ε = a` is `a_{ηξ} x Δt e^{a Δt}`). Form `a_{ηξ} x` first. A zero coupling or zero predictor is exactly zero. `ε ≥ 0` fails closed. That contribution is not `κ = −a m x`, not `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, and not the dissipating Dirac `m x`. The observed mean of that extra-process contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a))` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of that §7.2 contribution; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-21T06:12Z). The extra process has `LAMBDA` 0 and is not an observed indicator. Original indicators load on the original process after the `DRIFT` coupling. The evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean. The contemporaneous map `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean. The contribution is not `E(y_t)`. The evolved-plus-contribution latent mean is not `E(y_t)`. `T0TDPREDEFFECT` on the extra process begins at `t = 0` and uses `Δt = t − t0` for both the original-process evolution and the extra drive. `TDPREDEFFECT` after `t0` uses `t − u` with `t0 < u < t` for the extra drive while `μ_t` still uses `Δt`. The observed mean of that after-t0 extra-process contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a))` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of that §7.2 after-t0 contribution; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-21T06:32Z). The first-occasion extra-process observed mean is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t0`. The impulse-carry map `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is a Dirac on the original process and is not that `DRIFT` drive. An impulse at `u = t0` or `u = t` is not interior. The asymptotic time-independent predictor effect is `-B z / a` (Driver et al., 2017, §7.2, pp. 20–21; JSS PDF opened 2026-08-21T13:08Z). Form `B z` first, then divide by `-a`. Stable `a < 0` is required. `a ≥ 0` cannot hold a finite process-mean change. `-B z / a` is not the coefficient `B`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`. The asymptotic time-independent predictor variance is `(B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §7.2, pp. 20–21 `addedTIPREDVAR`). Form the unit asymptotic effect first, then square, then multiply by `v`. `(B / a)² v` is not `TRAITVAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`, and not `-B z / a`. The asymptotic continuous intercept is `-κ / a` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 2, p. 12 `asymCINT`; Eq. 3 as `Δt → ∞`; JSS PDF opened 2026-08-21T16:13Z). Form `κ` first, then divide by `-a`. Stable `a < 0` is required. `-κ / a` is not `κ`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ`, not `T0MEANS`, and not `-B z / a`. The p. 16 stationary `T0MEANS` constraint is `-κ / a + −B z / a`. Form the intercept contribution first, then include the TI extra effect, then add. That constrained first-occasion mean is not free `T0MEANS`, not `asymCINT` alone, not `asymTIPREDEFFECT` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent mean. Equation 5 of that constrained mean is `τ + λ(−κ / a + −B z / a)` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3, pp. 9–10; Eq. 5, p. 5; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-21T20:07Z). Form the stationary latent mean first, then `τ + λ` of that mean. `τ + λ μ_0` for free `T0MEANS` is not that composition. `τ + λ(−κ / a)` is not that composition when `B z ≠ 0`. `τ + λ μ_t` is not that composition. `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_0)`. The constrained latent mean is not `E(y_0)`. The p. 16 constrained first-occasion variance `trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v` is not free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION` alone, not `TRAITVAR` alone, not `addedTIPREDVAR` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent variance. Eq. 5 of that constrained variance is `λ²(trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` (JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T03:20Z; form the stationary latent variance first, then `λ² p + θ + ψ`; `λ² p_0` is not that observed variance; `λ²(−q / (2 a)) + θ` is not that observed variance when `TRAITVAR` or `addedTIPREDVAR` is nonzero; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_0)`; the constrained latent variance is not `Var(y_0)`). The lagged covariance of that constrained process is `trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4 of §4.3 / p. 16 `T0VAR`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T19:13Z). Trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay with `e^{a Δt}`. Contemporaneous `T0VAR` is not that lagged map. Decaying the constrained total as if it were all state is not that lagged map. Equation 5 of that lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v) + ψ`. `Θ` does not enter. Contemporaneous `Var(y_0)` is not that lagged observed covariance. The lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance. The later-occasion variance of that constrained process is `trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4 of §4.3 / p. 16 `T0VAR`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T23:12Z). Trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`. Under stationarity that composition equals contemporaneous `T0VAR`. Evolving the constrained total as if it were all state is not that later map. The lagged covariance omits `Q_Δt` and is not that later map. `Q_Δt` is not that later map. Equation 5 of that later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`. The lagged observed covariance omits `Q_Δt` and `θ`. `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`. The later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`. The later-occasion variance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4 of §4.3 predetermined first occasion; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T05:12Z). Trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`. Free `T0VAR` `p_0` is not that later map. Setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary later-occasion map. Stationary later variance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that later map when `p_0` is free. Evolving `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` as if it were all state is not that later map. As `Δt → ∞` with stable `a < 0` the composition approaches contemporaneous stationary `T0VAR`. As `Δt → 0+` the composition approaches `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v`. Nonzero diffusion with `a ≥ 0` is a growing process and is kept. Equation 5 of that predetermined later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`. `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`. The predetermined later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`. Stationary later observed variance is not that observed variance when `p_0` is free. The lagged covariance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4 of §4.3 predetermined first occasion; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T09:04Z). Trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay with `e^{a Δt}`. Free `T0VAR` `p_0` is not that lagged map. Setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary lagged map. Stationary lagged covariance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that lagged map when `p_0` is free. Evolving `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` as if it were all state is not that lagged map. Later-occasion variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that lagged map. As `Δt → ∞` with stable `a < 0` the state term vanishes. As `Δt → 0+` the composition approaches `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v`. Equation 5 of that predetermined lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v) + ψ`. `MANIFESTVAR` does not enter. The predetermined lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance. Predetermined later observed variance includes `Q_Δt` and `θ` and is not that lagged observed covariance. Stationary lagged observed covariance is not that observed covariance when `p_0` is free. The predetermined first-occasion variance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v`. Free `p_0` is not that map. Stationary first-occasion variance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that map when `p_0` is free. Lagged covariance decays the state and is not that map. Later-occasion variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that map. Equation 5 of that predetermined first-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`. `MANIFESTVAR` is not that first-occasion observed variance. The predetermined first-occasion latent variance is not that observed variance. Stationary first-occasion observed variance is not that observed variance when `p_0` is free. Predetermined later observed variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that first-occasion observed variance. Later-start lagged covariance of predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `startoffset`; Eq. 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T10:27Z). First-occasion lagged omits `e^{a s} Q_u`. Later-occasion variance does not lag. Stationary lagged uses `−q / (2 a)`. Decaying the later total is not that map. Equation 5 of that later-start lagged covariance is `λ²` of it plus `ψ`. Independent `ε_t` does not enter. First-occasion lagged observed omits `e^{a s} Q_u`. Predetermined later observed variance includes `Q_u` and `θ` and is not that later-start lagged observed covariance. Later-start later-occasion variance of predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + Q_s + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `startoffset`; Eq. 3–4 Chapman–Kolmogorov `Q_{u+s} = e^{2 a s} Q_u + Q_s`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T11:05Z). Later-occasion variance at `u` omits `Q_s`. Later-start lagged covariance omits `Q_s`. Stationary later uses `−q / (2 a)`. Evolving the later total as if it were all state is not that map. Ignoring `startoffset` omits `e^{2 a s} Q_u`. Equation 5 of that later-start later-occasion variance is `λ²` of it plus `θ + ψ`. `MANIFESTVAR` is not that observed variance. Page 16 `discreteDRIFTstd` is `e^{a Δt}` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; footnote 4; §7.1; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T11:40Z). Unstandardised `e^{a Δt}` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`. The §7.1 trait-plus-state autocorrelation `(trait + e^{a Δt} p + added) / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `discreteDIFFUSIONstd` is `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; Eq. 4; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T13:06Z). Unstandardised `Q_Δt` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`. The continuous standardisation `−2 a` is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`. `Q_Δt / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `DIFFUSIONstd` is `q / (−q / (2 a)) = −2 a` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; Eq. 4; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T13:20Z). Unstandardised `q` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`. The discrete standardisation `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a))` depends on `Δt` and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`. `q / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `DRIFTstd` is the continuous auto-effect after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; Eq. 1; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T13:28Z). Unstandardised `a` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DRIFTstd`. The discrete standardisation `e^{a Δt}` depends on the event interval and is not `DRIFTstd`. `a p / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DRIFTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` is `(-B / a) · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; §7.2; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T14:25Z). Unstandardised `-B / a` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`. The finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`. `(-B / a) · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; §7.2; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T16:21Z). Unstandardised `B` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`. The asymptotic standardisation `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`. The finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `B · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 / Table 3 `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_b · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` `p_0` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; p. 16; footnote 4; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T17:20Z). The affected variance is free first-occasion `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`. Unstandardised `t0_b` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `TIPREDEFFECTstd` `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` is the continuous coefficient and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `t0_b · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `t0_b² v` after a first-occasion time-independent predictor (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; p. 16; §7.2; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T18:20Z). Form `t0_b` first, then square, then multiply by `v`. A zero coefficient or zero predictor variance is exactly zero. Free `T0TIPREDEFFECT` does not require `a < 0`. `(B / a)² v` is `addedTIPREDVAR` and is not this first-occasion map. `t0_b · √v / √p_0` is `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` and is not this variance. Free `T0VAR` is not this extra TI variance. `TRAITVAR` is not this extra TI variance. Equation 5 of 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `λ² t0_b² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5, p. 5; Table 3, p. 13; Table 2, p. 12; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T19:10Z). Form `t0_b² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`. A zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero. `t0_b² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra. `λ² p_0 + θ` is first-occasion observed variance, not this extra. `λ² (B / a)² v` is Eq. 5 of `addedTIPREDVAR`, not this first-occasion observed extra. `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra. Equation 5 of §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `λ² (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5, p. 5; Table 2, p. 12; §7.2, pp. 20–21; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T19:23Z). Form `(B / a)² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`. A zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero. Lasting asymptotic extra requires `a < 0`. `(B / a)² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra. `λ² t0_b² v` is first-occasion extra observed TI variance, not this extra. `λ² p + θ` is stationary observed variance, not this extra. `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra. Page 16 `TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `m · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` and strictly positive time-dependent predictor variance. Unstandardised `M` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`. `TIPREDEFFECTstd` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd` even when `M = B`. intercept-style `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] M · √v / √p` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`. `m · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`. Table 3 / p. 16 `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_m · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` and strictly positive TD predictor variance. Unstandardised `t0_m` is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`. `TDPREDEFFECTstd` uses `asymDIFFUSION` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`. `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` even when `t0_m = t0_b`. `t0_m · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`. Free `T0VAR` does not require `a < 0`. Page 16 `T0VARstd` is `p_0 / p_0 = 1` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(T0VAR))) %&% T0VAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; the default ridge is 0). Unstandardised `T0VAR` is not `T0VARstd`. `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` is not `T0VARstd`. `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is not `T0VARstd`. Page 16 `TRAITVARstd` is `trait / trait = 1` after strictly positive `TRAITVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(TRAITVAR))) %&% TRAITVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; no ridge addend). Unstandardised `TRAITVAR` is not `TRAITVARstd`. `T0VARstd` is not `TRAITVARstd` even when both equal 1. `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is not `TRAITVARstd`. Page 16 `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` is `ψ / ψ = 1` after strictly positive `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTTRAITVAR))) %&% MANIFESTTRAITVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0). Unstandardised `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`. `TRAITVARstd` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` even when both equal 1. `MANIFESTVAR` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`. Page 16 `MANIFESTVARstd` is `θ / θ = 1` after strictly positive `MANIFESTVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTVAR))) %&% MANIFESTVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; 2017-era `dimnames` assignment to `latentNames` is a source bug). Unstandardised `MANIFESTVAR` is not `MANIFESTVARstd`. `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` is not `MANIFESTVARstd` even when both equal 1. Equation 5 `Var(y)` is not `MANIFESTVARstd`. Page 16 `TIPREDVARstd` is `v / v = 1` after strictly positive `TIPREDVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(TIPREDVAR))) %&% TIPREDVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `TIpredNames`). Unstandardised `TIPREDVAR` is not `TIPREDVARstd`. `MANIFESTVARstd` is not `TIPREDVARstd` even when both equal 1. Section 7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is not `TIPREDVARstd`. Page 16 `asymDIFFUSIONstd` is `p / p = 1` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` (`solve(sqrt(diag(asymDIFFUSION))) %&% asymDIFFUSION`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `latentNames`). Unstandardised `asymDIFFUSION` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd`. `TIPREDVARstd` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd` even when both equal 1. `DIFFUSIONstd` `−2 a` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd`. Page 16 `discreteCINTstd` is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`. Unstandardised `discreteCINT` is not `discreteCINTstd`. `κ / √p` is not `discreteCINTstd`. `(-κ / a) / √p` is not `discreteCINTstd`. `asymCINTstd` is `(-κ / a) / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`. Unstandardised `asymCINT` is not `asymCINTstd`. `κ / √p` is not `asymCINTstd`. `discreteCINTstd` is not `asymCINTstd`. `T0MEANSstd` is `μ_0 / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR`. Unstandardised `T0MEANS` is not `T0MEANSstd`. `T0VARstd` is not `T0MEANSstd`. `μ_0 / √asymDIFFUSION` is not `T0MEANSstd`. Page 16 `MANIFESTMEANSstd` is `τ / √θ` after strictly positive `MANIFESTVAR`. Unstandardised `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `MANIFESTMEANSstd`. `MANIFESTVARstd` is not `MANIFESTMEANSstd`. `τ / √(λ² Var(η) + θ)` is not `MANIFESTMEANSstd`. Page 16 `CINTstd` is `κ / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`. Unstandardised `CINT` is not `CINTstd`. `asymCINTstd` is not `CINTstd`. `discreteCINTstd` is not `CINTstd`. `κ / √(trait + p + added)` is not `CINTstd`. Evolving from that stationary start with `CINT` and `TIPREDEFFECT` stays at the stationary mean. Equation 1 is the latent SDE, not the measurement model. Form `(λ p) λ` then add `θ`, then add `ψ`. `MANIFESTVAR` is `Θ`, not `Var(y)`. `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is `Ψ_τ`, not `Θ`. `TRAITVAR` is latent and scaled by `λ²`. `Var(η)` is not `Var(y)`.
-- Separate cluster means before within-unit lag. CWC plus an event-time lag is not DSEM. Subtracting the person-specific mean from a raw autoregressive series does not isolate the lagged within-person effect (Curran & Bauer, 2011, pp. 607–608); already-centered residuals with irregular event intervals use the exact scalar map.
+- Separate cluster means before within-unit lag. CWC plus an event-time lag is not DSEM. Subtracting the person-specific mean from a raw autoregressive series does not isolate the lagged within-person effect (Curran & Bauer, 2011, pp. 607–608); already-centered residuals with irregular event intervals use the exact scalar map. Occasion-mean residuals `p_it = x_it − μ_t` (Hamaker, Kuiper, & Grasman, 2015, Eq. 1a; UvA-DARE PDF opened 2026-09-03T06:07Z KST) still contain trait-like between-person deviations; lagged relations on them are not within-person and are not RI-CLPM (their Eq. 3a). Unaligned event times fail closed. This is not the sample-wide grand mean (`#332`) and not person-specific linear detrend (`#333`).
 - Do not treat the CWC cluster-mean coefficient as the between-cluster effect. It is the contextual effect `between − within` (Enders & Tofighi, 2007, Table 2, pp. 124–127).
 - Never use future-available evidence in historical model fits.
 - Do not blanket-mask PII when identity/role/linkage is scientifically required. Follow the purpose-bound separation, opaque-ID, encryption, retention, and audit contract in `docs/PRIVACY_DATA_GOVERNANCE.md`.
diff --git a/crates/psychometric_core/Cargo.toml b/crates/psychometric_core/Cargo.toml
index 5cb09c8b7..d09820400 100644
--- a/crates/psychometric_core/Cargo.toml
+++ b/crates/psychometric_core/Cargo.toml
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 [package]
 name = "psychometric_core"
-description = "Posterior-aware ESEM/DSEM input gates, multilevel/event-time recovery, CWC contextual effect, Voelkle Eqs. 12 and 14, Driver Eq. 3 TDPRED/TIPRED maps including within-interval impulse carry, Rubin T, and strong-invariance latent means."
+description = "Posterior-aware ESEM/DSEM input gates, multilevel/event-time recovery, CWC contextual effect, Hamaker Eq. 1a occasion-mean residual lag (not within-person), Voelkle Eqs. 12 and 14, Driver Eq. 3 TDPRED/TIPRED maps including within-interval impulse carry, Rubin T, and strong-invariance latent means."
 version.workspace = true
 edition.workspace = true
 rust-version.workspace = true
diff --git a/crates/psychometric_core/src/error.rs b/crates/psychometric_core/src/error.rs
index 4ab2695e0..f71e97cc6 100644
--- a/crates/psychometric_core/src/error.rs
+++ b/crates/psychometric_core/src/error.rs
@@ -710,6 +710,12 @@ pub enum PsychometricError {
     /// `MANIFESTVARstd`. `λ² Var(η) + θ` is `Var(y)`, not the
     /// correlation form of `Θ`.
     ObservedVarianceIsNotStandardisedManifestVariance,
+    /// Hamaker, Kuiper, and Grasman (2015, Eq. 1a–1d) occasion-mean
+    /// residuals `p_it = x_it − μ_t` were treated as within-person
+    /// residuals. Those temporal deviations still contain trait-like
+    /// between-person differences from the time-varying group mean.
+    /// This is not RI-CLPM (their Eq. 3a).
+    OccasionMeanCenteredLagIsNotWithinPerson,
 }
 
 impl fmt::Display for PsychometricError {
@@ -1235,6 +1241,9 @@ impl fmt::Display for PsychometricError {
             Self::ObservedVarianceIsNotStandardisedManifestVariance => {
                 "observed-indicator variance is not standardised measurement-error variance"
             }
+            Self::OccasionMeanCenteredLagIsNotWithinPerson => {
+                "occasion-mean-centered lag is not a within-person lag"
+            }
         };
         formatter.write_str(message)
     }
@@ -2073,4 +2082,12 @@ mod tests {
             "measurement error is not standardised manifest-trait variance"
         );
     }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn occasion_mean_centered_lag_boundary_message_is_stable() {
+        assert_eq!(
+            PsychometricError::OccasionMeanCenteredLagIsNotWithinPerson.to_string(),
+            "occasion-mean-centered lag is not a within-person lag"
+        );
+    }
 }
diff --git a/crates/psychometric_core/src/event_time.rs b/crates/psychometric_core/src/event_time.rs
index a29bc5c18..0fdde88d8 100644
--- a/crates/psychometric_core/src/event_time.rs
+++ b/crates/psychometric_core/src/event_time.rs
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@
 //! The difference quotient `(x(t+Δt) − x(t)) / Δt` (their
 //! Eqs. 3–4) is refused. This is not DSEM and not a matrix `expm`.
 
-use std::collections::BTreeMap;
+use std::collections::{BTreeMap, BTreeSet};
 
 use crate::error::PsychometricError;
 use crate::indicator::require_finite;
@@ -6795,6 +6795,146 @@ pub fn recover_irregular_centered_residual_log_rate(
     require_finite(sum / count)
 }
 
+/// Occasion-mean residuals on aligned event-time waves.
+///
+/// Hamaker, Kuiper, and Grasman (2015, Eq. 1a; UvA-DARE PDF opened
+/// 2026-09-03T06:07Z KST) write `x_it = μ_t + p_it` where `μ_t` is the
+/// grand mean at occasion `t`, not the sample-wide grand mean and not
+/// the person mean. The returned residuals are those `p_it` lagged on
+/// event time. They still contain trait-like between-person deviations
+/// from the time-varying group mean, so lagged relations on them are
+/// **not** within-person. This is not RI-CLPM (their Eq. 3a) and not
+/// DSEM. Unaligned event times have no shared occasion and fail closed.
+/// Consecutive aligned waves may have unequal spacing; each pair keeps
+/// its own event interval.
+///
+/// # Errors
+///
+/// Returns [`PsychometricError::EventTimeRequired`] for a non-event clock,
+/// [`PsychometricError::InvalidNumericInput`] for empty, singleton, duplicate
+/// cluster-occasion, or non-finite rows, [`PsychometricError::InsufficientClusters`]
+/// when fewer than two clusters appear at any occasion, and
+/// [`PsychometricError::NonPositiveInterval`] when consecutive times are
+/// not strictly increasing.
+pub fn center_occasion_mean_event_lags(
+    rows: &[ClusteredEventScore],
+    clock: LagClock,
+) -> Result<Vec<LaggedWithinResidual>, PsychometricError> {
+    if !clock.admits_structural_lag() {
+        return Err(PsychometricError::EventTimeRequired);
+    }
+    if rows.len() < 2 {
+        return Err(PsychometricError::InvalidNumericInput);
+    }
+    let mut clusters = BTreeSet::new();
+    let mut by_time: BTreeMap<u64, Vec<ClusteredEventScore>> = BTreeMap::new();
+    for &row in rows {
+        if !row.event_time.is_finite() || !row.score.is_finite() {
+            return Err(PsychometricError::InvalidNumericInput);
+        }
+        clusters.insert(row.cluster_key);
+        by_time
+            .entry(row.event_time.to_bits())
+            .or_default()
+            .push(row);
+    }
+    if clusters.len() < 2 {
+        return Err(PsychometricError::InsufficientClusters);
+    }
+    let mut occasion_mean: BTreeMap<u64, f64> = BTreeMap::new();
+    for (time_bits, occasion_rows) in &by_time {
+        let mut seen = BTreeSet::new();
+        let mut sum = 0.0_f64;
+        for row in occasion_rows {
+            if !seen.insert(row.cluster_key) {
+                return Err(PsychometricError::InvalidNumericInput);
+            }
+            sum += row.score;
+        }
+        if seen.len() < 2 {
+            return Err(PsychometricError::InsufficientClusters);
+        }
+        let mean = sum / seen.len() as f64;
+        if !mean.is_finite() {
+            return Err(PsychometricError::InvalidNumericInput);
+        }
+        occasion_mean.insert(*time_bits, mean);
+    }
+    let mut by_cluster: BTreeMap<u64, Vec<ClusteredEventScore>> = BTreeMap::new();
+    for &row in rows {
+        by_cluster.entry(row.cluster_key).or_default().push(row);
+    }
+    let mut pairs = Vec::new();
+    for occasions in by_cluster.values_mut() {
+        if occasions.len() < 2 {
+            continue;
+        }
+        occasions.sort_by(|left, right| {
+            left.event_time
+                .partial_cmp(&right.event_time)
+                .unwrap_or(std::cmp::Ordering::Equal)
+        });
+        for window in occasions.windows(2) {
+            let earlier = window[0];
+            let later = window[1];
+            let delta = later.event_time - earlier.event_time;
+            if !delta.is_finite() || delta <= 0.0 {
+                return Err(PsychometricError::NonPositiveInterval);
+            }
+            let earlier_mean = occasion_mean[&earlier.event_time.to_bits()];
+            let later_mean = occasion_mean[&later.event_time.to_bits()];
+            let earlier_residual = earlier.score - earlier_mean;
+            let later_residual = later.score - later_mean;
+            if !(earlier_residual.is_finite() & later_residual.is_finite()) {
+                return Err(PsychometricError::InvalidNumericInput);
+            }
+            pairs.push(LaggedWithinResidual {
+                earlier_residual,
+                later_residual,
+                event_delta: delta,
+            });
+        }
+    }
+    if pairs.is_empty() {
+        return Err(PsychometricError::InvalidNumericInput);
+    }
+    Ok(pairs)
+}
+
+/// Mean exact scalar log-rate of Hamaker Eq. 1a occasion-mean residuals.
+///
+/// Form `p_it = x_it − μ_t` on aligned waves, then
+/// `a = ln(p_{i,t}/p_{i,t-1}) / Δt` (Voelkle et al., 2012, Eq. 7).
+/// Consecutive aligned waves may have unequal spacing. Unaligned event
+/// times fail closed. This recovered rate is **not** a within-person lag
+/// (Hamaker et al., 2015, Eq. 1a–1d). This is not RI-CLPM and not DSEM.
+///
+/// # Errors
+///
+/// Returns the centering errors from [`center_occasion_mean_event_lags`]
+/// and the scalar-map errors from
+/// [`recover_irregular_centered_residual_log_rate`].
+pub fn recover_occasion_mean_centered_irregular_residual_log_rate(
+    rows: &[ClusteredEventScore],
+    clock: LagClock,
+) -> Result<f64, PsychometricError> {
+    let pairs = center_occasion_mean_event_lags(rows, clock)?;
+    recover_irregular_centered_residual_log_rate(&pairs, clock)
+}
+
+/// Refuse treating a Hamaker Eq. 1a occasion-mean log-rate as within-person.
+///
+/// # Errors
+///
+/// Always returns
+/// [`PsychometricError::OccasionMeanCenteredLagIsNotWithinPerson`].
+pub fn refuse_occasion_mean_centered_log_rate_as_within_person_lag(
+    log_rate: f64,
+) -> Result<f64, PsychometricError> {
+    let _ = log_rate;
+    Err(PsychometricError::OccasionMeanCenteredLagIsNotWithinPerson)
+}
+
 /// Least-squares scalar log-rate for already-formed residual pairs.
 ///
 /// Pair-wise logs initialize Newton. This helper is crate-visible so overflow
@@ -6853,7 +6993,8 @@ pub(crate) fn fit_scalar_log_rate(pairs: &[(f64, f64, f64)]) -> Result<f64, Psyc
 #[cfg(test)]
 mod tests {
     use super::{
-        ClusteredEventScore, EventOccasion, LagClock, LaggedWithinResidual, fit_scalar_log_rate,
+        ClusteredEventScore, EventOccasion, LagClock, LaggedWithinResidual,
+        center_occasion_mean_event_lags, fit_scalar_log_rate,
         map_discrete_lag_across_event_intervals, recover_asymptotic_continuous_intercept,
         recover_asymptotic_time_independent_predictor_effect,
         recover_asymptotic_time_independent_predictor_variance,
@@ -6886,6 +7027,7 @@ mod tests {
         recover_level_change_extra_process_contribution_after, recover_local_log_rate,
         recover_manifest_lagged_observed_covariance, recover_manifest_observed_mean,
         recover_manifest_observed_variance, recover_manifest_trait_plus_state_observed_variance,
+        recover_occasion_mean_centered_irregular_residual_log_rate,
         recover_standardised_asymptotic_continuous_intercept,
         recover_standardised_asymptotic_diffusion, recover_standardised_continuous_intercept,
         recover_standardised_discrete_continuous_intercept,
@@ -6977,6 +7119,7 @@ mod tests {
         refuse_measurement_error_as_stationary_lagged_observed_covariance,
         refuse_measurement_error_as_stationary_later_observed_variance,
         refuse_observed_scaled_manifest_mean_as_standardised_manifest_mean,
+        refuse_occasion_mean_centered_log_rate_as_within_person_lag,
         refuse_pooled_discrete_lag_across_unequal_intervals,
         refuse_process_noise_as_unconditional_variance,
         refuse_standardised_asymptotic_diffusion_as_standardised_initial_latent_variance,
@@ -8286,6 +8429,201 @@ mod tests {
         );
     }
 
+    fn trending_group_mean_scores(drift: f64) -> [ClusteredEventScore; 6] {
+        let phi = drift.exp();
+        [
+            clustered(1, 0.0, 0.0 + 1.0),
+            clustered(1, 1.0, 4.0 + phi),
+            clustered(1, 3.0, 10.0 + phi * (drift * 2.0).exp()),
+            clustered(2, 0.0, 0.0 - 1.0),
+            clustered(2, 1.0, 4.0 - phi),
+            clustered(2, 3.0, 10.0 - phi * (drift * 2.0).exp()),
+        ]
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn occasion_mean_residuals_recover_known_drift_and_differ_from_cwc() {
+        let drift = -0.5_f64;
+        let rows = trending_group_mean_scores(drift);
+        let pairs =
+            center_occasion_mean_event_lags(&rows, LagClock::EventTime).expect("occasion pairs");
+        assert_eq!(pairs.len(), 4);
+        assert!((pairs[0].earlier_residual - 1.0).abs() < 1e-15);
+        assert!((pairs[0].later_residual - drift.exp()).abs() < 1e-15);
+        assert!((pairs[0].event_delta - 1.0).abs() < 1e-15);
+        assert!((pairs[1].event_delta - 2.0).abs() < 1e-15);
+        let recovered =
+            recover_occasion_mean_centered_irregular_residual_log_rate(&rows, LagClock::EventTime)
+                .expect("occasion lag");
+        assert!((recovered - drift).abs() < 1e-12);
+        let cwc = recover_within_residual_event_time_log_rate(&rows, LagClock::EventTime)
+            .expect("cwc of trending means");
+        assert!(
+            (cwc - drift).abs() > 1e-6,
+            "Hamaker Eq. 1a residuals are not person-mean residuals: occasion {recovered} vs CWC {cwc}"
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            refuse_occasion_mean_centered_log_rate_as_within_person_lag(recovered),
+            Err(PsychometricError::OccasionMeanCenteredLagIsNotWithinPerson)
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn occasion_mean_centering_fails_closed() {
+        let ok = trending_group_mean_scores(-0.5);
+        assert_eq!(
+            center_occasion_mean_event_lags(&ok, LagClock::SystemTime),
+            Err(PsychometricError::EventTimeRequired)
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            recover_occasion_mean_centered_irregular_residual_log_rate(
+                &ok,
+                LagClock::AssertionTime
+            ),
+            Err(PsychometricError::EventTimeRequired)
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            center_occasion_mean_event_lags(&[], LagClock::EventTime),
+            Err(PsychometricError::InvalidNumericInput)
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            center_occasion_mean_event_lags(&[clustered(1, 0.0, 1.0)], LagClock::EventTime),
+            Err(PsychometricError::InvalidNumericInput)
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            center_occasion_mean_event_lags(
+                &[clustered(1, 0.0, 1.0), clustered(1, 1.0, 0.5)],
+                LagClock::EventTime
+            ),
+            Err(PsychometricError::InsufficientClusters)
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            recover_occasion_mean_centered_irregular_residual_log_rate(
+                &[
+                    clustered(1, 0.0, 1.0),
+                    clustered(1, 1.0, 0.5),
+                    clustered(2, 0.1, 2.0),
+                    clustered(2, 1.1, 1.0),
+                ],
+                LagClock::EventTime
+            ),
+            Err(PsychometricError::InsufficientClusters)
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            center_occasion_mean_event_lags(
+                &[clustered(1, 0.0, 1.0), clustered(2, 0.0, 2.0)],
+                LagClock::EventTime
+            ),
+            Err(PsychometricError::InvalidNumericInput)
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            center_occasion_mean_event_lags(
+                &[
+                    clustered(1, 0.0, 1.0),
+                    clustered(1, 0.0, 1.2),
+                    clustered(2, 0.0, 2.0),
+                    clustered(2, 1.0, 1.5),
+                ],
+                LagClock::EventTime
+            ),
+            Err(PsychometricError::InvalidNumericInput)
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            center_occasion_mean_event_lags(
+                &[clustered(1, f64::NAN, 1.0), clustered(2, 1.0, 0.5)],
+                LagClock::EventTime
+            ),
+            Err(PsychometricError::InvalidNumericInput)
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            center_occasion_mean_event_lags(
+                &[clustered(1, 0.0, 1.0), clustered(2, 1.0, f64::INFINITY)],
+                LagClock::EventTime
+            ),
+            Err(PsychometricError::InvalidNumericInput)
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn occasion_mean_centering_overflow_and_interval_fail_closed() {
+        assert_eq!(
+            center_occasion_mean_event_lags(
+                &[
+                    clustered(1, 0.0, f64::MAX),
+                    clustered(1, 1.0, 1.0),
+                    clustered(2, 0.0, f64::MAX),
+                    clustered(2, 1.0, 0.5),
+                ],
+                LagClock::EventTime
+            ),
+            Err(PsychometricError::InvalidNumericInput)
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            center_occasion_mean_event_lags(
+                &[
+                    clustered(1, 0.0, f64::MAX),
+                    clustered(1, 1.0, 1.0),
+                    clustered(2, 0.0, f64::MIN),
+                    clustered(2, 1.0, 0.5),
+                    clustered(3, 0.0, f64::MIN),
+                    clustered(3, 1.0, 0.25),
+                ],
+                LagClock::EventTime
+            ),
+            Err(PsychometricError::InvalidNumericInput)
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            center_occasion_mean_event_lags(
+                &[
+                    clustered(1, 0.0, 1.0),
+                    clustered(1, 1.0, f64::MAX),
+                    clustered(2, 0.0, -1.0),
+                    clustered(2, 1.0, f64::MIN),
+                    clustered(3, 0.0, 0.0),
+                    clustered(3, 1.0, f64::MIN),
+                ],
+                LagClock::EventTime
+            ),
+            Err(PsychometricError::InvalidNumericInput)
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            center_occasion_mean_event_lags(
+                &[
+                    clustered(1, -f64::MAX, 1.0),
+                    clustered(1, f64::MAX, 0.5),
+                    clustered(2, -f64::MAX, -1.0),
+                    clustered(2, f64::MAX, -0.5),
+                ],
+                LagClock::EventTime
+            ),
+            Err(PsychometricError::NonPositiveInterval)
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            refuse_occasion_mean_centered_log_rate_as_within_person_lag(0.0),
+            Err(PsychometricError::OccasionMeanCenteredLagIsNotWithinPerson)
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn occasion_mean_skips_cluster_with_one_aligned_wave() {
+        let drift = -0.5_f64;
+        let phi = drift.exp();
+        let rows = [
+            clustered(1, 0.0, 0.0 + 1.0),
+            clustered(1, 1.0, 4.0 + phi),
+            clustered(2, 0.0, 0.0 - 1.0),
+            clustered(2, 1.0, 4.0 - phi),
+            clustered(3, 0.0, 0.0),
+        ];
+        let pairs = center_occasion_mean_event_lags(&rows, LagClock::EventTime)
+            .expect("skip singleton-wave cluster");
+        assert_eq!(pairs.len(), 2);
+        let recovered =
+            recover_occasion_mean_centered_irregular_residual_log_rate(&rows, LagClock::EventTime)
+                .expect("occasion lag after skip");
+        assert!((recovered - drift).abs() < 1e-12);
+    }
+
     #[test]
     fn singleton_cluster_is_skipped_and_all_singletons_fail_closed() {
         let drift = -0.2_f64;
diff --git a/crates/psychometric_core/src/lib.rs b/crates/psychometric_core/src/lib.rs
index c081a63f6..55ba37e21 100644
--- a/crates/psychometric_core/src/lib.rs
+++ b/crates/psychometric_core/src/lib.rs
@@ -10,7 +10,9 @@
 //! uncertainty pooling, combines draw-level OLS loadings with Rubin `T`,
 //! decomposes cluster-mean within/between OLS and the CWC contextual effect,
 //! maps event-time discrete lags through the exact scalar exponential, maps
-//! already-centered irregular residuals without re-centering, remaps discrete
+//! already-centered irregular residuals without re-centering, maps Hamaker
+//! (2015, Eq. 1a) occasion-mean residuals through that log-rate (those
+//! residuals are not within-person and this is not RI-CLPM), remaps discrete
 //! lags across unequal event intervals through that log-rate, recovers the
 //! exact scalar discrete effect of a constant predictor, recovers the
 //! first-order discrete effect of a time-varying predictor with matched
@@ -309,6 +311,8 @@ pub use event_time::EventOccasion;
 pub use event_time::LagClock;
 /// Already-centered lagged residual pair with an irregular event interval.
 pub use event_time::LaggedWithinResidual;
+/// Hamaker Eq. 1a occasion-mean residual lags on aligned event-time waves.
+pub use event_time::center_occasion_mean_event_lags;
 /// Map a discrete lag onto another event interval through the exact log-rate.
 pub use event_time::map_discrete_lag_across_event_intervals;
 /// Exact scalar Table 2 `asymCINT` `-κ / a`.
@@ -399,6 +403,8 @@ pub use event_time::recover_manifest_observed_mean;
 pub use event_time::recover_manifest_observed_variance;
 /// Exact scalar observed-indicator variance `λ² Var(η) + θ + ψ`.
 pub use event_time::recover_manifest_trait_plus_state_observed_variance;
+/// Hamaker Eq. 1a occasion-mean residual log-rate (not within-person; not RI-CLPM).
+pub use event_time::recover_occasion_mean_centered_irregular_residual_log_rate;
 /// Exact scalar p. 16 `asymCINTstd` `(-κ / a) / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`.
 pub use event_time::recover_standardised_asymptotic_continuous_intercept;
 /// Exact scalar p. 16 `asymDIFFUSIONstd` `p / p = 1` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`.
@@ -612,6 +618,8 @@ pub use event_time::refuse_measurement_error_as_stationary_lagged_observed_covar
 pub use event_time::refuse_measurement_error_as_stationary_later_observed_variance;
 /// Refuse treating `τ / √(λ² Var(η) + θ)` as `MANIFESTMEANSstd`.
 pub use event_time::refuse_observed_scaled_manifest_mean_as_standardised_manifest_mean;
+/// Refuse treating a Hamaker Eq. 1a occasion-mean log-rate as within-person.
+pub use event_time::refuse_occasion_mean_centered_log_rate_as_within_person_lag;
 /// Refuse pooling discrete lags from unequal event intervals.
 pub use event_time::refuse_pooled_discrete_lag_across_unequal_intervals;
 /// Refuse treating Driver Eq. 3 process noise as the unconditional variance.
diff --git a/crates/psychometric_core/tests/multilevel_event_time_recovery_contract.rs b/crates/psychometric_core/tests/multilevel_event_time_recovery_contract.rs
index 1c0027f44..12b8dedff 100644
--- a/crates/psychometric_core/tests/multilevel_event_time_recovery_contract.rs
+++ b/crates/psychometric_core/tests/multilevel_event_time_recovery_contract.rs
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ use psychometric_core::{
     recover_level_change_extra_process_contribution_after,
     recover_manifest_lagged_observed_covariance, recover_manifest_observed_mean,
     recover_manifest_observed_variance, recover_manifest_trait_plus_state_observed_variance,
+    recover_occasion_mean_centered_irregular_residual_log_rate,
     recover_standardised_asymptotic_continuous_intercept,
     recover_standardised_asymptotic_diffusion, recover_standardised_continuous_intercept,
     recover_standardised_discrete_continuous_intercept, recover_standardised_initial_latent_mean,
@@ -118,6 +119,7 @@ use psychometric_core::{
     refuse_measurement_error_as_stationary_lagged_observed_covariance,
     refuse_measurement_error_as_stationary_later_observed_variance,
     refuse_observed_variance_as_standardised_manifest_variance,
+    refuse_occasion_mean_centered_log_rate_as_within_person_lag,
     refuse_pooled_discrete_lag_across_unequal_intervals,
     refuse_process_noise_as_unconditional_variance,
     refuse_standardised_initial_latent_variance_as_standardised_trait_variance,
@@ -713,6 +715,41 @@ fn irregular_centered_residuals_recover_known_drift_better_than_cwc_of_raw_ar()
     );
 }
 
+#[test]
+fn occasion_mean_centered_residuals_recover_known_drift_and_are_not_cwc() {
+    let true_drift = -0.35_f64;
+    let mut rows = Vec::new();
+    for (cluster, start) in [(1_u64, 1.1_f64), (2, -0.9)] {
+        for step in 0..6 {
+            let time = f64::from(step);
+            let group_mean = 2.0 * time;
+            rows.push(ClusteredEventScore {
+                cluster_key: cluster,
+                event_time: time,
+                score: group_mean + start * (true_drift * time).exp(),
+            });
+        }
+    }
+    let recovered =
+        recover_occasion_mean_centered_irregular_residual_log_rate(&rows, LagClock::EventTime)
+            .expect("occasion mean lag");
+    let occasion_error = rmse(&[true_drift], &[recovered]);
+    assert!(
+        occasion_error < 1e-12,
+        "Hamaker Eq. 1a occasion-mean RMSE {occasion_error}"
+    );
+    let cwc = recover_within_residual_event_time_log_rate(&rows, LagClock::EventTime).expect("cwc");
+    let cwc_error = rmse(&[true_drift], &[cwc]);
+    assert!(
+        cwc_error > occasion_error,
+        "Hamaker et al. (2015): CWC RMSE {cwc_error} must exceed occasion-mean {occasion_error}"
+    );
+    assert_eq!(
+        refuse_occasion_mean_centered_log_rate_as_within_person_lag(recovered),
+        Err(PsychometricError::OccasionMeanCenteredLagIsNotWithinPerson)
+    );
+}
+
 #[test]
 fn discrete_latent_variance_recovers_driver_equations_three_and_four() {
     let prior = 2.0_f64;
diff --git a/crates/psychometric_core/tests/scientific_claim_boundary_contract.rs b/crates/psychometric_core/tests/scientific_claim_boundary_contract.rs
index 6ccf7f38b..2f112911b 100644
--- a/crates/psychometric_core/tests/scientific_claim_boundary_contract.rs
+++ b/crates/psychometric_core/tests/scientific_claim_boundary_contract.rs
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ use psychometric_core::{
     recover_level_change_extra_process_contribution_after, recover_loading_point_estimate_mean,
     recover_manifest_lagged_observed_covariance, recover_manifest_observed_mean,
     recover_manifest_observed_variance, recover_manifest_trait_plus_state_observed_variance,
+    recover_occasion_mean_centered_irregular_residual_log_rate,
     recover_standardised_asymptotic_continuous_intercept,
     recover_standardised_asymptotic_diffusion, recover_standardised_continuous_intercept,
     recover_standardised_discrete_continuous_intercept, recover_standardised_initial_latent_mean,
@@ -118,6 +119,7 @@ use psychometric_core::{
     refuse_measurement_error_as_stationary_later_observed_variance,
     refuse_observed_scaled_manifest_mean_as_standardised_manifest_mean,
     refuse_observed_variance_as_standardised_manifest_variance,
+    refuse_occasion_mean_centered_log_rate_as_within_person_lag,
     refuse_process_noise_as_unconditional_variance,
     refuse_standardised_asymptotic_diffusion_as_standardised_initial_latent_variance,
     refuse_standardised_continuous_diffusion_as_standardised_asymptotic_diffusion,
@@ -265,6 +267,57 @@ fn person_mean_subtraction_on_raw_ar_is_not_the_lagged_within_effect() {
     );
 }
 
+#[test]
+fn occasion_mean_centered_lag_is_not_within_person() {
+    let drift = -0.4_f64;
+    let phi = drift.exp();
+    let rows = [
+        ClusteredEventScore {
+            cluster_key: 1,
+            event_time: 0.0,
+            score: 0.0 + 1.2,
+        },
+        ClusteredEventScore {
+            cluster_key: 1,
+            event_time: 1.0,
+            score: 5.0 + 1.2 * phi,
+        },
+        ClusteredEventScore {
+            cluster_key: 1,
+            event_time: 2.0,
+            score: 11.0 + 1.2 * (drift * 2.0).exp(),
+        },
+        ClusteredEventScore {
+            cluster_key: 2,
+            event_time: 0.0,
+            score: 0.0 - 0.8,
+        },
+        ClusteredEventScore {
+            cluster_key: 2,
+            event_time: 1.0,
+            score: 5.0 - 0.8 * phi,
+        },
+        ClusteredEventScore {
+            cluster_key: 2,
+            event_time: 2.0,
+            score: 11.0 - 0.8 * (drift * 2.0).exp(),
+        },
+    ];
+    let occasion =
+        recover_occasion_mean_centered_irregular_residual_log_rate(&rows, LagClock::EventTime)
+            .expect("occasion mean lag");
+    assert!((occasion - drift).abs() < 1e-12);
+    let cwc = recover_within_residual_event_time_log_rate(&rows, LagClock::EventTime).expect("cwc");
+    assert!(
+        (cwc - drift).abs() > 1e-6,
+        "Hamaker et al. (2015, Eq. 1a): p_it still contains between-person deviations; CWC {cwc} must not equal occasion-mean log-rate {occasion}"
+    );
+    assert_eq!(
+        refuse_occasion_mean_centered_log_rate_as_within_person_lag(occasion),
+        Err(psychometric_core::PsychometricError::OccasionMeanCenteredLagIsNotWithinPerson)
+    );
+}
+
 #[test]
 fn cwc_cluster_mean_coefficient_is_not_the_between_cluster_effect() {
     let rows = [
diff --git a/docs/adr/0005-posterior-esem-dsem.md b/docs/adr/0005-posterior-esem-dsem.md
index ee1e6cf0d..e33c7fe5b 100644
--- a/docs/adr/0005-posterior-esem-dsem.md
+++ b/docs/adr/0005-posterior-esem-dsem.md
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Longitudinal analysis evaluates measurement invariance at the level needed for t
 
 This ADR remains **accepted-target**. Naming ESEM/DSEM and compositional coordinates as the model-family contract is not a protected-main implementation claim.
 
-The executable multilevel slice is cluster-mean centering (CWC) plus within/between OLS, the CWC contextual effect (`between − within`), and Kish-weighted slopes. Enders and Tofighi (2007, Table 2, pp. 124–127) show that the CWC cluster-mean coefficient is the contextual effect, not the between-cluster effect. It is not DSEM and not RI-CLPM. The executable temporal slice maps a discrete lag through the exact scalar exponential `a = ln(φ) / Δt` on event time only (Voelkle, Oud, Davidov, & Schmidt, 2012, Eq. 7; Driver, Oud, & Voelkle, 2017, Eq. 3), recovers the forward map `φ(Δt) = exp(a Δt)`, remaps a discrete lag onto another event interval through that log-rate, recovers the exact scalar discrete effect of a constant predictor (Voelkle et al., 2012, Eq. 12) as `a_yx (expm1(z) / a_xx)` with `z = a_xx Δt` so a finite result is not lost when `z` overflows to `-∞` or when `a_yx Δt` overflows, and in log space when `expm1(z)` overflows at a finite `z` (`a_yx = 0` is exactly zero; an overflowing `a_yx/a_xx` rewrite term fails closed), recovers the first-order discrete effect of a time-varying predictor with matched sampling and constancy intervals as `a_yx Δt` (Voelkle et al., 2012, Eq. 14; ZORA accepted manuscript p. 21; not Eq. 12; unmatched intervals fail closed because Oud & Jansen, 2000, is unread), recovers the exact scalar discrete process noise `Q_Δt = 0.5 q (expm1(z) / a)` with `z = 2 (a Δt)` and `q = G G⊤ ≥ 0` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-18T07:06Z, p. 4; scalar `L = 1`; do not form `2 a` first; `a = 0` and `z → 0` recover `q Δt`; `z → −∞` keeps `−0.5 q / a`; a zero diffusion is exactly zero; `z → +∞` and an overflowing rewrite scale `0.5 q / a` fail closed), recovers the exact scalar lagged latent covariance `exp(a Δt) p` and the law-of-total-variance map `Var(η_t) = exp(2 a Δt) p + Q_Δt` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4, pp. 4–5; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-18T18:03Z; JSS has no numbered §2.2; `Q_Δt` is `cov(η_t | η_{t-1})` and is refused as the unconditional variance; a zero diffusion whose `2 (a Δt)` overflows to `+∞` fails closed), recovers the exact scalar stationary within-subject variance `-q / (2 a)` as the `Δt → ∞` limit of Eq. 4 for stable `a < 0` (JSS p. 16 `asymDIFFUSION`; §4.3 T0VAR stationarity; when `2 a` is finite, form `q / -(2 a)` so `q / a` overflow does not lose a finite result (`q = MAX`, `a = -0.75` → `MAX / 1.5`; CodeRabbit on `75ecdd3`); when `2 a` overflows, form `(q / a) * -0.5`; do not form `0.5 q` first (`q = from_bits(1)`, `a = -from_bits(1)` → `0.5`); `a ≥ 0` and finite-interval `Q_Δt` fail closed as that limit), recovers the exact scalar trait-plus-state variance `trait + state` and lagged covariance `trait + exp(a Δt) p` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3, p. 9; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-18T21:07Z; a stable trait has `DRIFT` and `DIFFUSION` fixed to zero; `TRAITVAR` is not process noise and not `asymDIFFUSION`; evolving the summed variance as if it were all state fails the claim boundary; this is not RI-CLPM), recovers the exact scalar observed-indicator variance `λ² Var(η) + θ` when `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is zero and `λ² Var(η) + θ + ψ` otherwise, and the lagged observed covariance `λ² cov(η_t, η_{t-1}) + ψ` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5, p. 5; Table 2, p. 12; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-19T04:18Z; Equation 1 is the latent SDE; form `(λ p) λ` then add `θ`, then add `ψ`; do not form `λ²` first; `MANIFESTVAR` is `Θ`, not `Var(y)` and does not enter lagged observed covariance; `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is `Ψ_τ`, not `Θ`; `TRAITVAR` is latent and scaled by `λ²`; `Var(η)` is not `Var(y)`), recovers the exact scalar observed-indicator mean `τ + λ μ` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5, p. 5; Table 2, p. 12; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-19T14:08Z; `MANIFESTMEANS` is `τ`, not `E(y)`; `CINT` is not `MANIFESTMEANS`; `T0MEANS` is not `E(y)`), recovers the exact scalar discrete latent mean `exp(a Δt) μ_0 + (exp(a Δt) − 1)/a κ` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3, p. 4; Table 2, p. 12; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-19T18:10Z; `T0MEANS` is not `μ_t`; `CINT` is not the discrete increment; a zero drift is `κ Δt`; underflow of `exp(a Δt)` to `+0` drops the carried `T0MEANS` and keeps `−κ / a`), recovers the exact scalar evolved observed-indicator mean `τ + λ μ_t` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Eq. 3 expected-value map; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-19T22:10Z; the first-occasion map `τ + λ μ_0` is not `E(y_t)`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_t)`; `μ_t` is not `E(y_t)`), recovers the exact scalar contemporaneous time-dependent predictor impulse `m x` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 1–3, pp. 4–5; Table 2, p. 12; §7.2, pp. 20–21; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T07:10Z; `TDPREDEFFECT` is `M`, not `CINT`; `M x` is not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`; `M x` is not Voelkle et al., 2012, Eq. 14; the level-change form is not that impulse), recovers the exact scalar observed mean of that contemporaneous impulse `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Eq. 3 fourth-summand composition; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T09:01Z; the evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; the carry map `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-impulse latent mean is not `E(y_t)`), recovers the exact scalar time-independent predictor increment `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 1–3, pp. 4–5; Table 2, p. 12; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T10:13Z; `TIPREDEFFECT` is `B`, not `κ`; form `B z` first, then the discrete intercept map; a zero drift is `B z Δt`; `B` is not the discrete increment; `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z` is not `CINT`, not `M x`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14), recovers the exact scalar observed mean of that increment `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Eq. 3 printed addend after the `T0MEANS` carry and the `CINT` increment; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T12:12Z; the evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; the contemporaneous map `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the carry map `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-increment latent mean is not `E(y_t)`), recovers the exact scalar within-interval time-dependent impulse carry `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 1–2, pp. 4–5; Eq. 3 exponential map; §7.2, pp. 20–21; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T10:33Z; form `m x` first, then `e^{a(t−u)} m x`; a zero drift is `m x`; underflow of `e^{a(t−u)}` to `+0` is vanishing dissipation and is kept; `e^{A(t−u)} M x` is not the contemporaneous Dirac, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; an impulse at `u = t` is the contemporaneous map; an impulse at `u ≤ t0` is already in `η(t0)`), recovers the exact scalar observed mean of that carry `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Eq. 1–2 carried latent mean; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T05:12Z; the evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; the contemporaneous map `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_t)`; the carried latent mean is not `E(y_t)`), recovers the exact scalar first-occasion `T0TIPREDEFFECT` shift `t0_b z` and its Eq. 3 first-summand carry `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; Eq. 3, p. 5; JSS PDF opened 2026-08-20T15:14Z; form `t0_b z` first, then `e^{a Δt} t0_b z`; a zero drift is `t0_b z`; underflow of `e^{a Δt}` to `+0` is a vanishing carry and is kept; `t0_b z` is not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`; `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` is not `t0_b z`; `T0TIPREDEFFECT` is the coefficient, not the shift), recovers the exact scalar observed mean of that first-occasion carry `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Table 3 / Eq. 3 first-summand composition; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T15:28Z; the evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; the process-increment map `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean; the contemporaneous map `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the impulse-carry map `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t0`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-carry latent mean is not `E(y_t)`), recovers the exact scalar first-occasion `T0TDPREDEFFECT` shift `t0_m x0` and its Eq. 3 first-summand carry `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; Eq. 3, p. 5; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T19:10Z; form `t0_m x0` first, then `e^{a Δt} t0_m x0`; a zero drift is `t0_m x0`; underflow of `e^{a Δt}` to `+0` is a vanishing carry and is kept; `t0_m x0` is not `M x`, not `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`, not `t0_b z`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, and not `CINT`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `t0_m x0`; `T0TDPREDEFFECT` is the coefficient, not the shift; an impulse at `u ≤ t0` that used `M` is already in `η(t0)` as `TDPREDEFFECT`, not as `T0TDPREDEFFECT`), recovers the exact scalar observed mean of that first-occasion TD carry `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_m x0)` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Table 3 / Eq. 3 first-summand TD composition; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T19:07Z; the evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; the process-increment map `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean; the contemporaneous map `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the impulse-carry map `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t0`; the first-occasion TI map `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` is not that observed mean; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-carry latent mean is not `E(y_t)`), recovers the exact scalar §7.2 level-change `CINT` setting `κ = −a m x` (Driver et al., 2017, §7.2, pp. 20–21; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T19:45Z; form `m x` first, then multiply by `−a`; `a < 0` so `−κ / a = m x`; `a ≥ 0` cannot hold a new process mean; `−a m x` is not the dissipating Dirac, not a free `CINT`, and not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`; the extra near-zero-drift latent process also named in §7.2 is a different specification), recovers the exact scalar Eq. 3 increment of that setting `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x` (JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T19:50Z; form the level-change `CINT` first, then the discrete intercept map; underflow of `e^{a Δt}` to `+0` keeps `m x`; `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x` is not `m x`, not `κ`, and not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`), recovers the exact scalar §7.2 extra near-zero-drift latent process contribution `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)` (Driver et al., 2017, §7.2, pp. 22–23; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T23:10Z; form `a_{ηξ} x` first; `ε = a` is `a_{ηξ} x Δt e^{a Δt}`; a zero coupling or zero predictor is exactly zero; `ε ≥ 0` cannot hold a lasting extra state; that contribution is not `κ = −a m x`, not `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, and not the dissipating Dirac `m x`), recovers the exact scalar observed mean of that extra-process contribution `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a))` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5, p. 5; §7.2, pp. 22–23; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-21T06:12Z; the extra process has `LAMBDA` 0 and is not an observed indicator; form the evolved-plus-contribution latent mean first, then `τ + λ` of that mean; the evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; the contemporaneous map `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the contribution is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-contribution latent mean is not `E(y_t)`), recovers the exact scalar after-t0 extra-process contribution `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)` for `t0 < u < t` and its Eq. 5 observed mean `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a))` (Driver et al., 2017, §7.2, pp. 22–23; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-21T06:32Z; `T0TDPREDEFFECT` uses `Δt` for both the evolution and the extra drive; `TDPREDEFFECT` after `t0` uses `t − u` while `μ_t` still uses `Δt`; an impulse at `u = t0` or `u = t` is not interior; `e^{a(t−u)} m x` is a Dirac on the original process, not this `DRIFT` drive), recovers the exact scalar §7.2 `asymTIPREDEFFECT` `-B z / a` (Driver et al., 2017, §7.2, pp. 20–21; JSS PDF opened 2026-08-21T13:08Z; form `B z` first, then divide by `-a`; `a < 0`; a zero coefficient or zero predictor is exactly zero; `a ≥ 0` cannot hold a finite process-mean change; `-B z / a` is not the coefficient `B`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`), recovers the exact scalar §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` `(B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §7.2, pp. 20–21; form the unit asymptotic effect first, then square, then multiply by `v`; `v ≥ 0`; a zero coefficient or zero predictor variance is exactly zero; `(B / a)² v` is not `TRAITVAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`, and not `-B z / a`), recovers the exact scalar Table 2 `asymCINT` `-κ / a` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 2, p. 12; Eq. 3 as `Δt → ∞`; JSS PDF opened 2026-08-21T16:13Z; form `κ` first, then divide by `-a`; `a < 0`; a zero intercept is exactly zero; `-κ / a` is not `κ`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ`, not `T0MEANS`, and not `-B z / a`), recovers the exact scalar p. 16 stationary `T0MEANS` `-κ / a + −B z / a` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; form the intercept contribution first, then include the TI extra effect, then add; not free `T0MEANS`, not `asymCINT` alone, not `asymTIPREDEFFECT` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent mean), recovers the exact scalar Eq. 5 of that constrained mean `τ + λ(−κ / a + −B z / a)` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3, pp. 9–10; Eq. 5, p. 5; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-21T20:07Z; form the stationary latent mean first, then `τ + λ` of that mean; `τ + λ μ_0` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(−κ / a)` is not that observed mean when `B z ≠ 0`; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_0)`; the constrained latent mean is not `E(y_0)`), recovers the exact scalar §4.3 / p. 16 stationary `T0VAR` `trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3, pp. 9–10; p. 16; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T03:07Z; form the within-subject contribution first, then include the trait, then include the TI extra variance, then add; not free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION` alone, not `TRAITVAR` alone, not `addedTIPREDVAR` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent variance), recovers the exact scalar Eq. 5 of that constrained variance `λ²(trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3, pp. 9–10; Eq. 5, p. 5; Table 2, p. 12; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T03:20Z; form the stationary latent variance first, then `λ² p + θ + ψ`; `λ² p_0` is not that observed variance; `λ²(−q / (2 a)) + θ` is not that observed variance when `TRAITVAR` or `addedTIPREDVAR` is nonzero; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_0)`; the constrained latent variance is not `Var(y_0)`), recovers the exact scalar lagged covariance of that constrained process `trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4 of §4.3 / p. 16 `T0VAR`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T19:13Z; trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay with `e^{a Δt}`; contemporaneous `T0VAR` is not that lagged map; decaying the constrained total as if it were all state is not that lagged map), recovers the exact scalar Eq. 5 of that lagged covariance `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v) + ψ` (`Θ` does not enter; contemporaneous `Var(y_0)` is not that lagged observed covariance; the lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance), recovers the exact scalar later-occasion variance of that constrained process `trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4 of §4.3 / p. 16 `T0VAR`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T23:12Z; form the evolved within-subject variance first, then include the trait, then include the TI extra variance, then add; trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`; under stationarity that composition equals contemporaneous `T0VAR`; evolving the constrained total as if it were all state is not that later map; the lagged covariance omits `Q_Δt` and is not that later map; `Q_Δt` is not that later map), recovers the exact scalar Eq. 5 of that later-occasion variance `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` (the lagged observed covariance omits `Q_Δt` and `θ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not that later observed variance; the later-occasion latent variance is not that observed variance), and refuses the difference quotient, pooling discrete lags from unequal intervals, and a binary64 underflow of that exponential to `+0` (not a discrete lag). The first-order product `a_yx Δt` is Eq. 14 and the underflow limit of Eq. 12, not the general constant-predictor discrete effect. Already-centered residuals may have irregular event intervals. Subtracting the person-specific mean from a raw autoregressive series is not the lagged within-person residual (Curran & Bauer, 2011, pp. 607–608). Metric/weak invariance licenses shared metric meaning only. Latent-mean comparison requires strong (equal loading and intercept) or strict invariance (Putnick & Bornstein, 2016, PMC5145197 opened 2026-08-19T22:15Z: scalar is required for latent means; residual invariance is not). Two-observation series have no residual degrees of freedom and cap at strong/scalar; identically-zero OLS residual variance is not strict. This two-group OLS gate is not MGCFA.
+The executable multilevel slice is cluster-mean centering (CWC) plus within/between OLS, the CWC contextual effect (`between − within`), and Kish-weighted slopes. Enders and Tofighi (2007, Table 2, pp. 124–127) show that the CWC cluster-mean coefficient is the contextual effect, not the between-cluster effect. It is not DSEM and not RI-CLPM. The executable occasion-mean slice recovers Hamaker, Kuiper, and Grasman (2015, Eq. 1a–1b; UvA-DARE PDF opened 2026-09-03T06:07Z KST) time-varying group means `μ_t`. The temporal deviations `p_it = x_it − μ_t` still contain trait-like between-person differences from that occasion mean; lagged relations on those residuals are CLPM lags, not within-person lags. This is not RI-CLPM (their Eq. 3a). Unaligned event times have no shared occasion and fail closed. The executable temporal slice maps a discrete lag through the exact scalar exponential `a = ln(φ) / Δt` on event time only (Voelkle, Oud, Davidov, & Schmidt, 2012, Eq. 7; Driver, Oud, & Voelkle, 2017, Eq. 3), recovers the forward map `φ(Δt) = exp(a Δt)`, remaps a discrete lag onto another event interval through that log-rate, recovers the exact scalar discrete effect of a constant predictor (Voelkle et al., 2012, Eq. 12) as `a_yx (expm1(z) / a_xx)` with `z = a_xx Δt` so a finite result is not lost when `z` overflows to `-∞` or when `a_yx Δt` overflows, and in log space when `expm1(z)` overflows at a finite `z` (`a_yx = 0` is exactly zero; an overflowing `a_yx/a_xx` rewrite term fails closed), recovers the first-order discrete effect of a time-varying predictor with matched sampling and constancy intervals as `a_yx Δt` (Voelkle et al., 2012, Eq. 14; ZORA accepted manuscript p. 21; not Eq. 12; unmatched intervals fail closed because Oud & Jansen, 2000, is unread), recovers the exact scalar discrete process noise `Q_Δt = 0.5 q (expm1(z) / a)` with `z = 2 (a Δt)` and `q = G G⊤ ≥ 0` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-18T07:06Z, p. 4; scalar `L = 1`; do not form `2 a` first; `a = 0` and `z → 0` recover `q Δt`; `z → −∞` keeps `−0.5 q / a`; a zero diffusion is exactly zero; `z → +∞` and an overflowing rewrite scale `0.5 q / a` fail closed), recovers the exact scalar lagged latent covariance `exp(a Δt) p` and the law-of-total-variance map `Var(η_t) = exp(2 a Δt) p + Q_Δt` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4, pp. 4–5; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-18T18:03Z; JSS has no numbered §2.2; `Q_Δt` is `cov(η_t | η_{t-1})` and is refused as the unconditional variance; a zero diffusion whose `2 (a Δt)` overflows to `+∞` fails closed), recovers the exact scalar stationary within-subject variance `-q / (2 a)` as the `Δt → ∞` limit of Eq. 4 for stable `a < 0` (JSS p. 16 `asymDIFFUSION`; §4.3 T0VAR stationarity; when `2 a` is finite, form `q / -(2 a)` so `q / a` overflow does not lose a finite result (`q = MAX`, `a = -0.75` → `MAX / 1.5`; CodeRabbit on `75ecdd3`); when `2 a` overflows, form `(q / a) * -0.5`; do not form `0.5 q` first (`q = from_bits(1)`, `a = -from_bits(1)` → `0.5`); `a ≥ 0` and finite-interval `Q_Δt` fail closed as that limit), recovers the exact scalar trait-plus-state variance `trait + state` and lagged covariance `trait + exp(a Δt) p` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3, p. 9; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-18T21:07Z; a stable trait has `DRIFT` and `DIFFUSION` fixed to zero; `TRAITVAR` is not process noise and not `asymDIFFUSION`; evolving the summed variance as if it were all state fails the claim boundary; this is not RI-CLPM), recovers the exact scalar observed-indicator variance `λ² Var(η) + θ` when `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is zero and `λ² Var(η) + θ + ψ` otherwise, and the lagged observed covariance `λ² cov(η_t, η_{t-1}) + ψ` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5, p. 5; Table 2, p. 12; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-19T04:18Z; Equation 1 is the latent SDE; form `(λ p) λ` then add `θ`, then add `ψ`; do not form `λ²` first; `MANIFESTVAR` is `Θ`, not `Var(y)` and does not enter lagged observed covariance; `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is `Ψ_τ`, not `Θ`; `TRAITVAR` is latent and scaled by `λ²`; `Var(η)` is not `Var(y)`), recovers the exact scalar observed-indicator mean `τ + λ μ` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5, p. 5; Table 2, p. 12; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-19T14:08Z; `MANIFESTMEANS` is `τ`, not `E(y)`; `CINT` is not `MANIFESTMEANS`; `T0MEANS` is not `E(y)`), recovers the exact scalar discrete latent mean `exp(a Δt) μ_0 + (exp(a Δt) − 1)/a κ` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3, p. 4; Table 2, p. 12; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-19T18:10Z; `T0MEANS` is not `μ_t`; `CINT` is not the discrete increment; a zero drift is `κ Δt`; underflow of `exp(a Δt)` to `+0` drops the carried `T0MEANS` and keeps `−κ / a`), recovers the exact scalar evolved observed-indicator mean `τ + λ μ_t` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Eq. 3 expected-value map; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-19T22:10Z; the first-occasion map `τ + λ μ_0` is not `E(y_t)`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_t)`; `μ_t` is not `E(y_t)`), recovers the exact scalar contemporaneous time-dependent predictor impulse `m x` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 1–3, pp. 4–5; Table 2, p. 12; §7.2, pp. 20–21; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T07:10Z; `TDPREDEFFECT` is `M`, not `CINT`; `M x` is not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`; `M x` is not Voelkle et al., 2012, Eq. 14; the level-change form is not that impulse), recovers the exact scalar observed mean of that contemporaneous impulse `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Eq. 3 fourth-summand composition; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T09:01Z; the evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; the carry map `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-impulse latent mean is not `E(y_t)`), recovers the exact scalar time-independent predictor increment `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 1–3, pp. 4–5; Table 2, p. 12; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T10:13Z; `TIPREDEFFECT` is `B`, not `κ`; form `B z` first, then the discrete intercept map; a zero drift is `B z Δt`; `B` is not the discrete increment; `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z` is not `CINT`, not `M x`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14), recovers the exact scalar observed mean of that increment `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Eq. 3 printed addend after the `T0MEANS` carry and the `CINT` increment; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T12:12Z; the evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; the contemporaneous map `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the carry map `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-increment latent mean is not `E(y_t)`), recovers the exact scalar within-interval time-dependent impulse carry `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 1–2, pp. 4–5; Eq. 3 exponential map; §7.2, pp. 20–21; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T10:33Z; form `m x` first, then `e^{a(t−u)} m x`; a zero drift is `m x`; underflow of `e^{a(t−u)}` to `+0` is vanishing dissipation and is kept; `e^{A(t−u)} M x` is not the contemporaneous Dirac, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; an impulse at `u = t` is the contemporaneous map; an impulse at `u ≤ t0` is already in `η(t0)`), recovers the exact scalar observed mean of that carry `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Eq. 1–2 carried latent mean; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T05:12Z; the evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; the contemporaneous map `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_t)`; the carried latent mean is not `E(y_t)`), recovers the exact scalar first-occasion `T0TIPREDEFFECT` shift `t0_b z` and its Eq. 3 first-summand carry `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; Eq. 3, p. 5; JSS PDF opened 2026-08-20T15:14Z; form `t0_b z` first, then `e^{a Δt} t0_b z`; a zero drift is `t0_b z`; underflow of `e^{a Δt}` to `+0` is a vanishing carry and is kept; `t0_b z` is not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`; `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` is not `t0_b z`; `T0TIPREDEFFECT` is the coefficient, not the shift), recovers the exact scalar observed mean of that first-occasion carry `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Table 3 / Eq. 3 first-summand composition; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T15:28Z; the evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; the process-increment map `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean; the contemporaneous map `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the impulse-carry map `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t0`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-carry latent mean is not `E(y_t)`), recovers the exact scalar first-occasion `T0TDPREDEFFECT` shift `t0_m x0` and its Eq. 3 first-summand carry `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; Eq. 3, p. 5; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T19:10Z; form `t0_m x0` first, then `e^{a Δt} t0_m x0`; a zero drift is `t0_m x0`; underflow of `e^{a Δt}` to `+0` is a vanishing carry and is kept; `t0_m x0` is not `M x`, not `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`, not `t0_b z`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, and not `CINT`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `t0_m x0`; `T0TDPREDEFFECT` is the coefficient, not the shift; an impulse at `u ≤ t0` that used `M` is already in `η(t0)` as `TDPREDEFFECT`, not as `T0TDPREDEFFECT`), recovers the exact scalar observed mean of that first-occasion TD carry `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_m x0)` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5 of the Table 3 / Eq. 3 first-summand TD composition; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T19:07Z; the evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; the process-increment map `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean; the contemporaneous map `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the impulse-carry map `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t0`; the first-occasion TI map `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` is not that observed mean; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-carry latent mean is not `E(y_t)`), recovers the exact scalar §7.2 level-change `CINT` setting `κ = −a m x` (Driver et al., 2017, §7.2, pp. 20–21; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T19:45Z; form `m x` first, then multiply by `−a`; `a < 0` so `−κ / a = m x`; `a ≥ 0` cannot hold a new process mean; `−a m x` is not the dissipating Dirac, not a free `CINT`, and not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`; the extra near-zero-drift latent process also named in §7.2 is a different specification), recovers the exact scalar Eq. 3 increment of that setting `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x` (JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T19:50Z; form the level-change `CINT` first, then the discrete intercept map; underflow of `e^{a Δt}` to `+0` keeps `m x`; `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x` is not `m x`, not `κ`, and not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`), recovers the exact scalar §7.2 extra near-zero-drift latent process contribution `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)` (Driver et al., 2017, §7.2, pp. 22–23; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-20T23:10Z; form `a_{ηξ} x` first; `ε = a` is `a_{ηξ} x Δt e^{a Δt}`; a zero coupling or zero predictor is exactly zero; `ε ≥ 0` cannot hold a lasting extra state; that contribution is not `κ = −a m x`, not `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, and not the dissipating Dirac `m x`), recovers the exact scalar observed mean of that extra-process contribution `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a))` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5, p. 5; §7.2, pp. 22–23; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-21T06:12Z; the extra process has `LAMBDA` 0 and is not an observed indicator; form the evolved-plus-contribution latent mean first, then `τ + λ` of that mean; the evolved map `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; the contemporaneous map `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the contribution is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-contribution latent mean is not `E(y_t)`), recovers the exact scalar after-t0 extra-process contribution `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)` for `t0 < u < t` and its Eq. 5 observed mean `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a))` (Driver et al., 2017, §7.2, pp. 22–23; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-21T06:32Z; `T0TDPREDEFFECT` uses `Δt` for both the evolution and the extra drive; `TDPREDEFFECT` after `t0` uses `t − u` while `μ_t` still uses `Δt`; an impulse at `u = t0` or `u = t` is not interior; `e^{a(t−u)} m x` is a Dirac on the original process, not this `DRIFT` drive), recovers the exact scalar §7.2 `asymTIPREDEFFECT` `-B z / a` (Driver et al., 2017, §7.2, pp. 20–21; JSS PDF opened 2026-08-21T13:08Z; form `B z` first, then divide by `-a`; `a < 0`; a zero coefficient or zero predictor is exactly zero; `a ≥ 0` cannot hold a finite process-mean change; `-B z / a` is not the coefficient `B`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`), recovers the exact scalar §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` `(B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §7.2, pp. 20–21; form the unit asymptotic effect first, then square, then multiply by `v`; `v ≥ 0`; a zero coefficient or zero predictor variance is exactly zero; `(B / a)² v` is not `TRAITVAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`, and not `-B z / a`), recovers the exact scalar Table 2 `asymCINT` `-κ / a` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 2, p. 12; Eq. 3 as `Δt → ∞`; JSS PDF opened 2026-08-21T16:13Z; form `κ` first, then divide by `-a`; `a < 0`; a zero intercept is exactly zero; `-κ / a` is not `κ`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ`, not `T0MEANS`, and not `-B z / a`), recovers the exact scalar p. 16 stationary `T0MEANS` `-κ / a + −B z / a` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; form the intercept contribution first, then include the TI extra effect, then add; not free `T0MEANS`, not `asymCINT` alone, not `asymTIPREDEFFECT` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent mean), recovers the exact scalar Eq. 5 of that constrained mean `τ + λ(−κ / a + −B z / a)` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3, pp. 9–10; Eq. 5, p. 5; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-21T20:07Z; form the stationary latent mean first, then `τ + λ` of that mean; `τ + λ μ_0` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(−κ / a)` is not that observed mean when `B z ≠ 0`; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_0)`; the constrained latent mean is not `E(y_0)`), recovers the exact scalar §4.3 / p. 16 stationary `T0VAR` `trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3, pp. 9–10; p. 16; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T03:07Z; form the within-subject contribution first, then include the trait, then include the TI extra variance, then add; not free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION` alone, not `TRAITVAR` alone, not `addedTIPREDVAR` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent variance), recovers the exact scalar Eq. 5 of that constrained variance `λ²(trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3, pp. 9–10; Eq. 5, p. 5; Table 2, p. 12; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T03:20Z; form the stationary latent variance first, then `λ² p + θ + ψ`; `λ² p_0` is not that observed variance; `λ²(−q / (2 a)) + θ` is not that observed variance when `TRAITVAR` or `addedTIPREDVAR` is nonzero; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_0)`; the constrained latent variance is not `Var(y_0)`), recovers the exact scalar lagged covariance of that constrained process `trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4 of §4.3 / p. 16 `T0VAR`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T19:13Z; trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay with `e^{a Δt}`; contemporaneous `T0VAR` is not that lagged map; decaying the constrained total as if it were all state is not that lagged map), recovers the exact scalar Eq. 5 of that lagged covariance `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v) + ψ` (`Θ` does not enter; contemporaneous `Var(y_0)` is not that lagged observed covariance; the lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance), recovers the exact scalar later-occasion variance of that constrained process `trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4 of §4.3 / p. 16 `T0VAR`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T23:12Z; form the evolved within-subject variance first, then include the trait, then include the TI extra variance, then add; trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`; under stationarity that composition equals contemporaneous `T0VAR`; evolving the constrained total as if it were all state is not that later map; the lagged covariance omits `Q_Δt` and is not that later map; `Q_Δt` is not that later map), recovers the exact scalar Eq. 5 of that later-occasion variance `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` (the lagged observed covariance omits `Q_Δt` and `θ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not that later observed variance; the later-occasion latent variance is not that observed variance), and refuses the difference quotient, pooling discrete lags from unequal intervals, and a binary64 underflow of that exponential to `+0` (not a discrete lag). The first-order product `a_yx Δt` is Eq. 14 and the underflow limit of Eq. 12, not the general constant-predictor discrete effect. Already-centered residuals may have irregular event intervals. Subtracting the person-specific mean from a raw autoregressive series is not the lagged within-person residual (Curran & Bauer, 2011, pp. 607–608). Metric/weak invariance licenses shared metric meaning only. Latent-mean comparison requires strong (equal loading and intercept) or strict invariance (Putnick & Bornstein, 2016, PMC5145197 opened 2026-08-19T22:15Z: scalar is required for latent means; residual invariance is not). Two-observation series have no residual degrees of freedom and cap at strong/scalar; identically-zero OLS residual variance is not strict. This two-group OLS gate is not MGCFA.
 
 The executable standardised-intercept slice recovers Driver et al. (2017, p. 16 `CINTstd`) as `κ / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `p = −q / (2 a)` (footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-25T11:43Z). Unstandardised `κ` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not that map. `(-κ / a) / √p` is `asymCINTstd` and is not `CINTstd`. `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ / √p` is `discreteCINTstd` and is not `CINTstd`. `κ / √(trait + p + added)` uses total variance and is not the residual map. This is not ctsem estimation.
 The executable standardised-measurement slice recovers Driver et al. (2017, p. 16 `MANIFESTMEANSstd`) as `τ / √θ` after strictly positive residual `MANIFESTVAR` (footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-25T11:32Z). Unstandardised `τ` is defined for a zero residual and is not that map. `θ / θ = 1` is the named `MANIFESTVARstd` correlation form and is not `MANIFESTMEANSstd` even when `τ = √θ`. `τ / √(λ² Var(η) + θ)` uses total observed variance and is not the residual map. This is not ctsem estimation.
diff --git a/docs/research/multilevel-event-time-recovery.md b/docs/research/multilevel-event-time-recovery.md
index 3701dcb4b..dfba6cc86 100644
--- a/docs/research/multilevel-event-time-recovery.md
+++ b/docs/research/multilevel-event-time-recovery.md
@@ -108,11 +108,12 @@ This slice stays inside `psychometric_core`. It does not add a second invariance
 102. refuse unmatched sampling and constancy intervals for a time-varying predictor (Oud & Jansen, 2000, unread);
 103. refuse the difference quotient as a continuous-time rate;
 104. apply the same event-time map to CWC residuals (still not DSEM);
-105. map already-centered lagged residuals with irregular event intervals without re-centering (Curran & Bauer, 2011, pp. 607–608).
+105. map already-centered lagged residuals with irregular event intervals without re-centering (Curran & Bauer, 2011, pp. 607–608);
+106. form Hamaker, Kuiper, and Grasman (2015, Eq. 1a; UvA-DARE PDF opened 2026-09-03T06:07Z KST) occasion-mean residuals `p_it = x_it − μ_t` on aligned event-time waves, map consecutive residuals through the exact scalar log-rate, and refuse treating that rate as a within-person lag (those residuals still contain trait-like between-person deviations; this is not RI-CLPM Eq. 3a; unaligned event times fail closed).
 
 ## Claim boundary
 
-This is two-level OLS and a noiseless scalar continuous-time map. It is not DSEM, not RI-CLPM, not a random-effects sampler, not a Kalman filter, and not a matrix `expm` implementation. The CWC cluster-mean coefficient is the **contextual** effect, not the between-cluster effect. Discrete lags from different event intervals are not one coefficient. Equation 14 is not Equation 12. Discrete process noise \(Q_{\Delta t}\) is not the continuous diffusion \(GG^{\top}\). \(Q_{\Delta t}\) is the conditional residual variance, not \(\operatorname{Var}(\eta_{t})\). Finite-interval \(Q_{\Delta t}\) is not the stationary within-subject variance. Trait variance is not process noise and not the stationary within-subject variance. Measurement-error variance is not the observed-indicator variance. Latent variance is not the observed-indicator variance. Manifest means are not the observed-indicator mean. The latent mean is not the observed-indicator mean. The continuous intercept is not the manifest mean. The first-occasion latent mean is not the evolved latent mean. The continuous intercept is not the discrete mean increment. The first-occasion observed mean is not the evolved observed mean. The contemporaneous `TDPREDEFFECT` impulse is not the continuous intercept, not the time-independent discrete effect, and not Voelkle et al. (2012, Eq. 14). The time-independent `TIPREDEFFECT` increment is not the continuous intercept, not the contemporaneous impulse, not Voelkle et al. (2012, Eq. 14), and not the coefficient `B`. The within-interval `TDPREDEFFECT` carry `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t` is not the contemporaneous Dirac, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle et al. (2012, Eq. 14). The evolved observed mean `τ + λ μ_t` is not the contemporaneous-impulse observed mean `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)`. The contemporaneous composition `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not the impulse-carry observed mean `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` when `u ≠ t`. The evolved observed mean `τ + λ μ_t` is not the impulse-carry observed mean. The carried latent mean is not `E(y_t)`. The evolved-plus-impulse latent mean is not `E(y_t)`. The evolved observed mean `τ + λ μ_t` is not the time-independent-predictor observed mean `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)`. The contemporaneous composition `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that time-independent-predictor observed mean. The impulse-carry composition `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that time-independent-predictor observed mean when `u ≠ t`. The evolved-plus-increment latent mean is not `E(y_t)`. The Table 3 first-occasion `T0TIPREDEFFECT` shift `t0_b z` is not the Eq. 3 process increment `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `κ`, and not `M x`. The Eq. 3 first-summand carry `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` is not `t0_b z` and is not that process increment. `T0TIPREDEFFECT` is the coefficient, not the first-occasion shift. The evolved observed mean `τ + λ μ_t` is not the first-occasion TI-predictor observed mean `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)`. The process-increment composition `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that first-occasion observed mean. The contemporaneous composition `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that first-occasion observed mean. The impulse-carry composition `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that first-occasion observed mean when `u ≠ t0`. The evolved-plus-T0TIPRED latent mean is not `E(y_t)`. The Table 3 first-occasion `T0TDPREDEFFECT` shift `t0_m x0` is not `M x`, not `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`, not `t0_b z`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, and not `κ`. The Eq. 3 first-summand carry `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `t0_m x0` and is not that within-interval impulse carry. `T0TDPREDEFFECT` is the coefficient, not the first-occasion shift. An impulse at `u ≤ t0` that used `M` is already in `η(t0)` as `TDPREDEFFECT`, not as `T0TDPREDEFFECT`. The evolved observed mean `τ + λ μ_t` is not the first-occasion TD-predictor observed mean `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_m x0)`. The process-increment composition `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that first-occasion TD observed mean. The contemporaneous composition `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that first-occasion TD observed mean. The impulse-carry composition `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that first-occasion TD observed mean when `u ≠ t0`. The first-occasion TI composition `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` is not that first-occasion TD observed mean. Same numbers as `T0TIPREDEFFECT` yield the same product; Table 3 names a different matrix. The evolved-plus-T0TDPRED latent mean is not `E(y_t)`. The §7.2 level-change `CINT` `κ = −a m x` is not the dissipating Dirac `m x`, not a free `CINT`, and not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`. Lasting level change via that `CINT` setting requires `a < 0`. The extra near-zero-drift latent process also named in §7.2 is a different specification and is not that `CINT` setting. The Eq. 3 increment of that setting `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x` is not the dissipating Dirac `m x`, not `κ`, and not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`. Underflow of `e^{a Δt}` to `+0` keeps the equilibrium offset `m x`. The §7.2 extra-process contribution `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)` is not `κ = −a m x`, not `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, and not the dissipating Dirac `m x`. Lasting level change via that extra process requires `ε < 0`. Precisely `ε = 0` causes computational problems in the printed specification. The extra-process observed mean `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a))` is not `τ + λ μ_t`, not `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)`, not the contribution, and not the evolved-plus-contribution latent mean. The extra process has `LAMBDA` 0 and is not an observed indicator. `T0TDPREDEFFECT` on the extra process uses `Δt = t − t0` for both the original-process evolution and the extra drive. `TDPREDEFFECT` after `t0` uses `t − u` with `t0 < u < t` for the extra drive while `μ_t` still uses `Δt`. The after-t0 extra-process observed mean is not the first-occasion extra-process observed mean when `u ≠ t0`. The impulse-carry `e^{a(t−u)} m x` is a Dirac on the original process and is not that `DRIFT` drive. The §7.2 `asymTIPREDEFFECT` `-B z / a` is the expected total change in process means given a time-independent predictor. It is not the coefficient `B`, not the finite-interval increment `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`. Lasting asymptotic change via that map requires `a < 0`. The §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` `(B / a)² v` is the stable between-subject variance accounted for by that predictor. It is not `TRAITVAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`, and not `-B z / a`. Table 2 `asymCINT` `-κ / a` is the intercept contribution to the stationary process mean. It is not `κ`, not the finite-interval increment `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ`, not `T0MEANS`, and not `-B z / a`. Lasting asymptotic intercept change via that map requires `a < 0`. Page 16 notes that a `T0MEANS` stationarity constraint includes time-independent predictors; that composition is not this intercept-only map. The p. 16 constrained first-occasion mean `-κ / a + −B z / a` is not free `T0MEANS`, not `asymCINT` alone, not `asymTIPREDEFFECT` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent mean. Equation 5 of that constrained mean `τ + λ(−κ / a + −B z / a)` is not `τ + λ μ_0`, not `τ + λ(−κ / a)` when `B z ≠ 0`, not `τ + λ μ_t`, not `MANIFESTMEANS`, and not the constrained latent mean. The p. 16 constrained first-occasion variance `trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v` is not free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION` alone, not `TRAITVAR` alone, not `addedTIPREDVAR` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent variance. Equation 5 of that constrained variance `λ²(trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` is not `λ² p_0 + θ`, not `λ²(−q / (2 a)) + θ` when `TRAITVAR` or `addedTIPREDVAR` is nonzero, not `λ² Var(η_t) + θ` when the first occasion is constrained, not `MANIFESTVAR`, and not the constrained latent variance. The lagged covariance of that constrained process `trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v` is not contemporaneous `T0VAR`, not `e^{a Δt}` of the constrained total, and not `trait + e^{a Δt} p` when `addedTIPREDVAR` is nonzero. Trait variance and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay with `e^{a Δt}`. Equation 5 of that lagged covariance `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v) + ψ` is not `θ`, not contemporaneous `Var(y_0)`, and not the lagged latent covariance. Independent measurement error does not enter lagged observed covariance. The later-occasion variance of that constrained process `trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` equals contemporaneous `T0VAR` under stationarity and is not the lagged covariance, not `e^{2 a Δt}` of the constrained total plus `Q_Δt`, and not `Q_Δt` alone. Trait variance and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`. Equation 5 of that later-occasion variance `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` is not `θ`, not lagged `cov(y_t, y_{t-1})`, and not the later-occasion latent variance. The later-occasion variance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` `trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` is not stationary later-occasion variance when `p_0` is free, not `e^{2 a Δt}` of `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` plus `Q_Δt`, and not free `p_0`. Trait variance and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`. Setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary later-occasion map. As `Δt → ∞` with stable `a < 0` the composition approaches contemporaneous stationary `T0VAR`. Nonzero diffusion with `a ≥ 0` is a growing process and is kept. Equation 5 of that predetermined later-occasion variance `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` is not `θ`, not the predetermined later-occasion latent variance, and not stationary later-occasion observed variance when `p_0` is free. The lagged covariance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` `trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v` is not stationary lagged covariance when `p_0` is free, not later-occasion variance, not `e^{a Δt}` of `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v`, and not free `p_0`. Trait variance and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay with `e^{a Δt}`. Setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary lagged map. As `Δt → ∞` with stable `a < 0` the state term vanishes. A zero-diffusion carry with `a ≥ 0` is `e^{a Δt} p_0` and is kept. Equation 5 of that predetermined lagged covariance `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v) + ψ` is not `θ`, not the predetermined lagged latent covariance, not predetermined later observed variance, and not stationary lagged observed covariance when `p_0` is free. Independent measurement error does not enter lagged observed covariance. The first-occasion variance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` is not stationary first-occasion variance when `p_0` is free, not free `p_0`, not lagged covariance, and not later-occasion variance. Trait variance and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay and do not enter `Q_Δt`. Setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary first-occasion map. As `Δt → 0+` the lagged and later maps approach this composition. Trait-only variance does not require a stable drift. Equation 5 of that predetermined first-occasion variance `λ²(trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` is not `θ`, not the predetermined first-occasion latent variance, not stationary first-occasion observed variance, and not predetermined later observed variance when `p_0` is free. The later-start lagged covariance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` `trait + e^{a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + (B / a)² v` is not first-occasion lagged covariance when `u > 0`, not later-occasion variance, not stationary lagged covariance when `p_0` is free, and not `e^{a s}` of the later total. Trait variance and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay with `e^{a s}`. Setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary lagged map. As `u → 0+` the composition approaches first-occasion lagged covariance. As `s → 0+` the composition approaches later-occasion variance at `u`. Nonzero diffusion with `a ≥ 0` is a growing process and is kept. Equation 5 of that later-start lagged covariance `λ²(trait + e^{a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + (B / a)² v) + ψ` is not `θ`, not the later-start lagged latent covariance, not first-occasion lagged observed covariance, not predetermined later observed variance, and not stationary lagged observed covariance when `p_0` is free. Independent measurement error does not enter lagged observed covariance. The later-start later-occasion variance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` `trait + e^{2 a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + Q_s + (B / a)² v` is not later-occasion variance at `u` when `s > 0`, not later-start lagged covariance, not stationary later-occasion variance when `p_0` is free, not `e^{2 a s}` of the later total plus `Q_s`, and not later-occasion variance over the lag interval alone when `u > 0`. Trait variance and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_s`. Chapman–Kolmogorov writes `Q_{u+s} = e^{2 a s} Q_u + Q_s`. Setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary later-occasion map. As `u → 0+` the composition approaches later-occasion variance over `s`. As `s → 0+` the composition approaches later-occasion variance at `u`. Nonzero diffusion with `a ≥ 0` is a growing process and is kept. Equation 5 of that later-start later-occasion variance `λ²(trait + e^{2 a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + Q_s + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` is not `θ`, not the later-start later-occasion latent variance, not predetermined later observed variance, not later-start lagged observed covariance, and not stationary later-occasion observed variance when `p_0` is free. Page 16 `discreteDRIFTstd` is `e^{a Δt}` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4: standardise `DRIFT` using only within-subject variance, not the total). Unstandardised `e^{a Δt}` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`. The §7.1 trait-plus-state autocorrelation `(trait + e^{a Δt} p + added) / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `discreteDIFFUSIONstd` is `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4: standardise process noise using only within-subject variance, not the total). Unstandardised `Q_Δt` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`. The continuous standardisation `q / (−q / (2 a)) = −2 a` is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`. `Q_Δt / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `DIFFUSIONstd` is `q / (−q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4: standardise process noise using only within-subject variance, not the total). Unstandardised `q` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`. The discrete standardisation `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a)) = 1 − exp(2 a Δt)` depends on the event interval and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`. `q / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `DRIFTstd` is the continuous auto-effect after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4: standardise `DRIFT` using only within-subject variance, not the total). Unstandardised `a` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DRIFTstd`. The discrete standardisation `e^{a Δt}` depends on the event interval and is not `DRIFTstd`. `a p / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DRIFTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` is `(-B / a) · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (footnote 4: standardise using only the relevant variance, not the total; the affecting variance is `TIPREDVAR`; the affected variance is `asymDIFFUSION`). Unstandardised `-B / a` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`. The finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`. `(-B / a) · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (footnote 4: standardise using only the relevant variance, not the total; the affecting variance is `TIPREDVAR`; the affected variance is `asymDIFFUSION`). Unstandardised `B` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`. The asymptotic standardisation `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`. The finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `B · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Table 3 / p. 16 `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_b · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` `p_0` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (footnote 4: standardise using only the relevant variance, not the total; the affecting variance is `TIPREDVAR`; the affected variance is free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`). Unstandardised `t0_b` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `TIPREDEFFECTstd` `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` uses `asymDIFFUSION` and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `t0_b · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `t0_b² v` (`T0TIPREDEFFECT %*% TIPREDVAR %*% t(T0TIPREDEFFECT)` immediately after `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`). A zero coefficient or zero predictor variance is exactly zero. Free `T0TIPREDEFFECT` does not require `a < 0`. `(B / a)² v` is `addedTIPREDVAR` and is not this first-occasion map. `t0_b · √v / √p_0` is `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` and is not this variance. Free `T0VAR` is not this extra TI variance. `TRAITVAR` is not this extra TI variance. Equation 5 of 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `λ² t0_b² v`. Form `t0_b² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`. A zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero. `t0_b² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra. `λ² p_0 + θ` is first-occasion observed variance, not this extra. `λ² (B / a)² v` is Eq. 5 of `addedTIPREDVAR`, not this first-occasion observed extra. `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra. Equation 5 of §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `λ² (B / a)² v`. Form `(B / a)² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`. A zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero. Lasting asymptotic extra requires `a < 0`. `(B / a)² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra. `λ² t0_b² v` is first-occasion extra observed TI variance, not this extra. `λ² p + θ` is stationary observed variance, not this extra. `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra. Page 16 `TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `m · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive time-dependent predictor variance `v` (footnote 4: standardise using only the relevant variance, not the total; the affecting variance is the TD predictor; the affected variance is `asymDIFFUSION`). Unstandardised `M` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`. `TIPREDEFFECTstd` `B · √v / √p` is a different named matrix even when `M = B`. The finite-interval intercept-style standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] M · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`. `m · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Table 3 / p. 16 `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_m · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` `p_0` and strictly positive time-dependent predictor variance `v` (footnote 4: standardise using only the relevant variance, not the total; the affecting variance is the TD predictor, not `TIPREDVAR`; the affected variance is free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`). Unstandardised `t0_m` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`. `TDPREDEFFECTstd` `m · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` uses `asymDIFFUSION` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`. `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` `t0_b · √v / √p_0` is a different named matrix even when `t0_m = t0_b`. `t0_m · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Free `T0VAR` does not require `a < 0`. Page 16 `T0VARstd` is the correlation form `solve(sqrt(diag(T0VAR))) %&% T0VAR` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` `p_0` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; the default ridge is 0; the scalar map is `p_0 / p_0 = 1`). Unstandardised `T0VAR` is defined for a zero first-occasion variance and is not `T0VARstd`. Zero `p_0` fails closed. Distinct positive `p_0` recover the same 1. `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` `t0_m · √v / √p_0` depends on `p_0` and is not `T0VARstd`. `addedT0TIPREDVAR` `t0_b² v` is extra TI variance, not this correlation. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `TRAITVARstd` is the correlation form `solve(sqrt(diag(TRAITVAR))) %&% TRAITVAR` after strictly positive `TRAITVAR` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms it only when `TRAITVAR != 0`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; unlike `T0VARstd` there is no ridge addend; the scalar map is `trait / trait = 1`). Unstandardised `TRAITVAR` is defined for a zero trait and is not `TRAITVARstd`. Zero `TRAITVAR` fails closed. Distinct positive `trait` recover the same 1. `T0VARstd` `p_0 / p_0 = 1` recovers the same number and remains a distinct named quantity. `addedT0TIPREDVAR` `t0_b² v` is extra TI variance, not this correlation. `TRAITVAR` does not require `a < 0`. Page 16 `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` is the correlation form `solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTTRAITVAR))) %&% MANIFESTTRAITVAR` after strictly positive `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms it only when `MANIFESTTRAITVAR != 0`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; unlike `TRAITVARstd` the 2017-era source adds ridging; the default ridge is 0; the scalar map is `ψ / ψ = 1`). Unstandardised `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is defined for a zero trait and is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`. Zero `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` fails closed. Distinct positive `ψ` recover the same 1. `TRAITVARstd` `trait / trait = 1` recovers the same number and remains a distinct named quantity. `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is measurement error, not this correlation. `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` does not require `a < 0`. Page 16 `MANIFESTVARstd` is the correlation form `solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTVAR))) %&% MANIFESTVAR` after strictly positive `MANIFESTVAR` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms it whenever `verbose = TRUE`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; unlike `TRAITVARstd` the 2017-era source adds ridging; the default ridge is 0; the 2017-era `dimnames` assignment to `latentNames` is a source bug; the scalar map is `θ / θ = 1`). Unstandardised `MANIFESTVAR` is defined for a zero residual and is not `MANIFESTVARstd`. Zero `MANIFESTVAR` makes `solve(sqrt(0))` fail and fails closed. Distinct positive `θ` recover the same 1. `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` `ψ / ψ = 1` recovers the same number and remains a distinct named quantity. Equation 5 `λ² Var(η) + θ` is `Var(y)`, not this correlation. `MANIFESTVAR` does not require `a < 0`. Page 16 `TIPREDVARstd` is the correlation form `solve(sqrt(diag(TIPREDVAR))) %&% TIPREDVAR` after strictly positive `TIPREDVAR` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms it whenever `verbose = TRUE` and `n.TIpred > 0`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; unlike `TRAITVARstd` the 2017-era source adds ridging; the default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `TIpredNames`; the scalar map is `v / v = 1`). Unstandardised `TIPREDVAR` is defined for a zero predictor and is not `TIPREDVARstd`. Zero `TIPREDVAR` makes `solve(sqrt(0))` fail and fails closed. Distinct positive `v` recover the same 1. `MANIFESTVARstd` `θ / θ = 1` recovers the same number and remains a distinct named quantity. Section 7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` `(B / a)² v` is extra process variance, not this correlation. `TIPREDVAR` does not require `a < 0`. Page 16 `asymDIFFUSIONstd` is the correlation form `solve(sqrt(diag(asymDIFFUSION))) %&% asymDIFFUSION` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms it whenever `verbose = TRUE`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; the 2017-era source adds ridging; the default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `latentNames`; the scalar map is `p / p = 1`). Unstandardised `asymDIFFUSION` is defined for a zero process and is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd`. Zero `q` makes `solve(sqrt(0))` fail and fails closed. Distinct positive `p` recover the same 1. `TIPREDVARstd` `v / v = 1` recovers the same number and remains a distinct named quantity. `DIFFUSIONstd` `q / p = −2 a` is the continuous-diffusion ratio, not this correlation. Lasting `asymDIFFUSION` requires `a < 0`. Page 16 `discreteCINTstd` is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms unstandardised `discreteCINT` whenever `verbose = TRUE` as `solve(DRIFT) %*% (discreteDRIFT − I) %*% CINT`; that source does not form a `discreteCINTstd` matrix; the scalar map is the footnote 4 standardisation of that named discrete intercept). Unstandardised `discreteCINT` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteCINTstd`. Zero `q` has no positive process SD and fails closed. `κ / √p` does not depend on `Δt` and is not this finite-interval map. `(-κ / a) / √p` is the standardised asymptotic intercept and is not this map. Lasting `asymDIFFUSION` requires `a < 0`. Page 16 `asymCINTstd` is `(-κ / a) / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms unstandardised `asymCINT` whenever `verbose = TRUE` as `-solve(DRIFT) %*% CINT`; that source does not form an `asymCINTstd` matrix; the scalar map is the footnote 4 standardisation of that named asymptotic intercept). Unstandardised `asymCINT` is defined for a zero process and is not `asymCINTstd`. Zero `q` has no positive process SD and fails closed. `κ / √p` is the continuous intercept standardisation and is not this total-change map. `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ / √p` depends on the event interval and is not this `Δt → ∞` map. Lasting `asymDIFFUSION` requires `a < 0`. Page 16 `T0MEANSstd` is `μ_0 / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` `p_0` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms unstandardised `T0MEANS` and does not form a `T0MEANSstd` matrix; the scalar map is the footnote 4 standardisation of that named first-occasion mean; relevant variance is free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`). Unstandardised `T0MEANS` is defined for a zero first-occasion variance and is not `T0MEANSstd`. Zero `p_0` has no positive SD and fails closed. `T0VARstd` `p_0 / p_0 = 1` recovers the same number when `μ_0 = √p_0` and remains a distinct named quantity. `μ_0 / √asymDIFFUSION` uses process-dynamics variance and is not this first-occasion map. Free `T0MEANS` does not require `a < 0`. Page 16 `MANIFESTMEANSstd` is `τ / √θ` after strictly positive `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms unstandardised `MANIFESTMEANS` and does not form a `MANIFESTMEANSstd` matrix; the scalar map is the footnote 4 standardisation of that named measurement intercept; relevant variance is residual `MANIFESTVAR`, not total observed `Var(y)`). Unstandardised `MANIFESTMEANS` is defined for a zero residual and is not `MANIFESTMEANSstd`. Zero `θ` has no positive SD and fails closed. `MANIFESTVARstd` `θ / θ = 1` recovers the same number when `τ = √θ` and remains a distinct named quantity. `τ / √(λ² Var(η) + θ)` uses total observed variance and is not this residual map. `MANIFESTMEANS` does not require `a < 0`.
+This is two-level OLS and a noiseless scalar continuous-time map. It is not DSEM, not RI-CLPM, not a random-effects sampler, not a Kalman filter, and not a matrix `expm` implementation. Occasion-mean-centered lags (Hamaker et al., 2015, Eq. 1a) are not within-person lags. The CWC cluster-mean coefficient is the **contextual** effect, not the between-cluster effect. Discrete lags from different event intervals are not one coefficient. Equation 14 is not Equation 12. Discrete process noise \(Q_{\Delta t}\) is not the continuous diffusion \(GG^{\top}\). \(Q_{\Delta t}\) is the conditional residual variance, not \(\operatorname{Var}(\eta_{t})\). Finite-interval \(Q_{\Delta t}\) is not the stationary within-subject variance. Trait variance is not process noise and not the stationary within-subject variance. Measurement-error variance is not the observed-indicator variance. Latent variance is not the observed-indicator variance. Manifest means are not the observed-indicator mean. The latent mean is not the observed-indicator mean. The continuous intercept is not the manifest mean. The first-occasion latent mean is not the evolved latent mean. The continuous intercept is not the discrete mean increment. The first-occasion observed mean is not the evolved observed mean. The contemporaneous `TDPREDEFFECT` impulse is not the continuous intercept, not the time-independent discrete effect, and not Voelkle et al. (2012, Eq. 14). The time-independent `TIPREDEFFECT` increment is not the continuous intercept, not the contemporaneous impulse, not Voelkle et al. (2012, Eq. 14), and not the coefficient `B`. The within-interval `TDPREDEFFECT` carry `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t` is not the contemporaneous Dirac, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle et al. (2012, Eq. 14). The evolved observed mean `τ + λ μ_t` is not the contemporaneous-impulse observed mean `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)`. The contemporaneous composition `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not the impulse-carry observed mean `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` when `u ≠ t`. The evolved observed mean `τ + λ μ_t` is not the impulse-carry observed mean. The carried latent mean is not `E(y_t)`. The evolved-plus-impulse latent mean is not `E(y_t)`. The evolved observed mean `τ + λ μ_t` is not the time-independent-predictor observed mean `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)`. The contemporaneous composition `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that time-independent-predictor observed mean. The impulse-carry composition `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that time-independent-predictor observed mean when `u ≠ t`. The evolved-plus-increment latent mean is not `E(y_t)`. The Table 3 first-occasion `T0TIPREDEFFECT` shift `t0_b z` is not the Eq. 3 process increment `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `κ`, and not `M x`. The Eq. 3 first-summand carry `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` is not `t0_b z` and is not that process increment. `T0TIPREDEFFECT` is the coefficient, not the first-occasion shift. The evolved observed mean `τ + λ μ_t` is not the first-occasion TI-predictor observed mean `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)`. The process-increment composition `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that first-occasion observed mean. The contemporaneous composition `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that first-occasion observed mean. The impulse-carry composition `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that first-occasion observed mean when `u ≠ t0`. The evolved-plus-T0TIPRED latent mean is not `E(y_t)`. The Table 3 first-occasion `T0TDPREDEFFECT` shift `t0_m x0` is not `M x`, not `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`, not `t0_b z`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, and not `κ`. The Eq. 3 first-summand carry `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `t0_m x0` and is not that within-interval impulse carry. `T0TDPREDEFFECT` is the coefficient, not the first-occasion shift. An impulse at `u ≤ t0` that used `M` is already in `η(t0)` as `TDPREDEFFECT`, not as `T0TDPREDEFFECT`. The evolved observed mean `τ + λ μ_t` is not the first-occasion TD-predictor observed mean `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_m x0)`. The process-increment composition `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that first-occasion TD observed mean. The contemporaneous composition `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that first-occasion TD observed mean. The impulse-carry composition `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that first-occasion TD observed mean when `u ≠ t0`. The first-occasion TI composition `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` is not that first-occasion TD observed mean. Same numbers as `T0TIPREDEFFECT` yield the same product; Table 3 names a different matrix. The evolved-plus-T0TDPRED latent mean is not `E(y_t)`. The §7.2 level-change `CINT` `κ = −a m x` is not the dissipating Dirac `m x`, not a free `CINT`, and not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`. Lasting level change via that `CINT` setting requires `a < 0`. The extra near-zero-drift latent process also named in §7.2 is a different specification and is not that `CINT` setting. The Eq. 3 increment of that setting `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x` is not the dissipating Dirac `m x`, not `κ`, and not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`. Underflow of `e^{a Δt}` to `+0` keeps the equilibrium offset `m x`. The §7.2 extra-process contribution `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)` is not `κ = −a m x`, not `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, and not the dissipating Dirac `m x`. Lasting level change via that extra process requires `ε < 0`. Precisely `ε = 0` causes computational problems in the printed specification. The extra-process observed mean `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a))` is not `τ + λ μ_t`, not `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)`, not the contribution, and not the evolved-plus-contribution latent mean. The extra process has `LAMBDA` 0 and is not an observed indicator. `T0TDPREDEFFECT` on the extra process uses `Δt = t − t0` for both the original-process evolution and the extra drive. `TDPREDEFFECT` after `t0` uses `t − u` with `t0 < u < t` for the extra drive while `μ_t` still uses `Δt`. The after-t0 extra-process observed mean is not the first-occasion extra-process observed mean when `u ≠ t0`. The impulse-carry `e^{a(t−u)} m x` is a Dirac on the original process and is not that `DRIFT` drive. The §7.2 `asymTIPREDEFFECT` `-B z / a` is the expected total change in process means given a time-independent predictor. It is not the coefficient `B`, not the finite-interval increment `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`. Lasting asymptotic change via that map requires `a < 0`. The §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` `(B / a)² v` is the stable between-subject variance accounted for by that predictor. It is not `TRAITVAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`, and not `-B z / a`. Table 2 `asymCINT` `-κ / a` is the intercept contribution to the stationary process mean. It is not `κ`, not the finite-interval increment `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ`, not `T0MEANS`, and not `-B z / a`. Lasting asymptotic intercept change via that map requires `a < 0`. Page 16 notes that a `T0MEANS` stationarity constraint includes time-independent predictors; that composition is not this intercept-only map. The p. 16 constrained first-occasion mean `-κ / a + −B z / a` is not free `T0MEANS`, not `asymCINT` alone, not `asymTIPREDEFFECT` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent mean. Equation 5 of that constrained mean `τ + λ(−κ / a + −B z / a)` is not `τ + λ μ_0`, not `τ + λ(−κ / a)` when `B z ≠ 0`, not `τ + λ μ_t`, not `MANIFESTMEANS`, and not the constrained latent mean. The p. 16 constrained first-occasion variance `trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v` is not free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION` alone, not `TRAITVAR` alone, not `addedTIPREDVAR` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent variance. Equation 5 of that constrained variance `λ²(trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` is not `λ² p_0 + θ`, not `λ²(−q / (2 a)) + θ` when `TRAITVAR` or `addedTIPREDVAR` is nonzero, not `λ² Var(η_t) + θ` when the first occasion is constrained, not `MANIFESTVAR`, and not the constrained latent variance. The lagged covariance of that constrained process `trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v` is not contemporaneous `T0VAR`, not `e^{a Δt}` of the constrained total, and not `trait + e^{a Δt} p` when `addedTIPREDVAR` is nonzero. Trait variance and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay with `e^{a Δt}`. Equation 5 of that lagged covariance `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v) + ψ` is not `θ`, not contemporaneous `Var(y_0)`, and not the lagged latent covariance. Independent measurement error does not enter lagged observed covariance. The later-occasion variance of that constrained process `trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` equals contemporaneous `T0VAR` under stationarity and is not the lagged covariance, not `e^{2 a Δt}` of the constrained total plus `Q_Δt`, and not `Q_Δt` alone. Trait variance and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`. Equation 5 of that later-occasion variance `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` is not `θ`, not lagged `cov(y_t, y_{t-1})`, and not the later-occasion latent variance. The later-occasion variance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` `trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` is not stationary later-occasion variance when `p_0` is free, not `e^{2 a Δt}` of `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` plus `Q_Δt`, and not free `p_0`. Trait variance and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`. Setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary later-occasion map. As `Δt → ∞` with stable `a < 0` the composition approaches contemporaneous stationary `T0VAR`. Nonzero diffusion with `a ≥ 0` is a growing process and is kept. Equation 5 of that predetermined later-occasion variance `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` is not `θ`, not the predetermined later-occasion latent variance, and not stationary later-occasion observed variance when `p_0` is free. The lagged covariance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` `trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v` is not stationary lagged covariance when `p_0` is free, not later-occasion variance, not `e^{a Δt}` of `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v`, and not free `p_0`. Trait variance and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay with `e^{a Δt}`. Setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary lagged map. As `Δt → ∞` with stable `a < 0` the state term vanishes. A zero-diffusion carry with `a ≥ 0` is `e^{a Δt} p_0` and is kept. Equation 5 of that predetermined lagged covariance `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v) + ψ` is not `θ`, not the predetermined lagged latent covariance, not predetermined later observed variance, and not stationary lagged observed covariance when `p_0` is free. Independent measurement error does not enter lagged observed covariance. The first-occasion variance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` is not stationary first-occasion variance when `p_0` is free, not free `p_0`, not lagged covariance, and not later-occasion variance. Trait variance and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay and do not enter `Q_Δt`. Setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary first-occasion map. As `Δt → 0+` the lagged and later maps approach this composition. Trait-only variance does not require a stable drift. Equation 5 of that predetermined first-occasion variance `λ²(trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` is not `θ`, not the predetermined first-occasion latent variance, not stationary first-occasion observed variance, and not predetermined later observed variance when `p_0` is free. The later-start lagged covariance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` `trait + e^{a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + (B / a)² v` is not first-occasion lagged covariance when `u > 0`, not later-occasion variance, not stationary lagged covariance when `p_0` is free, and not `e^{a s}` of the later total. Trait variance and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay with `e^{a s}`. Setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary lagged map. As `u → 0+` the composition approaches first-occasion lagged covariance. As `s → 0+` the composition approaches later-occasion variance at `u`. Nonzero diffusion with `a ≥ 0` is a growing process and is kept. Equation 5 of that later-start lagged covariance `λ²(trait + e^{a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + (B / a)² v) + ψ` is not `θ`, not the later-start lagged latent covariance, not first-occasion lagged observed covariance, not predetermined later observed variance, and not stationary lagged observed covariance when `p_0` is free. Independent measurement error does not enter lagged observed covariance. The later-start later-occasion variance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` `trait + e^{2 a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + Q_s + (B / a)² v` is not later-occasion variance at `u` when `s > 0`, not later-start lagged covariance, not stationary later-occasion variance when `p_0` is free, not `e^{2 a s}` of the later total plus `Q_s`, and not later-occasion variance over the lag interval alone when `u > 0`. Trait variance and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_s`. Chapman–Kolmogorov writes `Q_{u+s} = e^{2 a s} Q_u + Q_s`. Setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary later-occasion map. As `u → 0+` the composition approaches later-occasion variance over `s`. As `s → 0+` the composition approaches later-occasion variance at `u`. Nonzero diffusion with `a ≥ 0` is a growing process and is kept. Equation 5 of that later-start later-occasion variance `λ²(trait + e^{2 a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + Q_s + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` is not `θ`, not the later-start later-occasion latent variance, not predetermined later observed variance, not later-start lagged observed covariance, and not stationary later-occasion observed variance when `p_0` is free. Page 16 `discreteDRIFTstd` is `e^{a Δt}` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4: standardise `DRIFT` using only within-subject variance, not the total). Unstandardised `e^{a Δt}` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`. The §7.1 trait-plus-state autocorrelation `(trait + e^{a Δt} p + added) / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `discreteDIFFUSIONstd` is `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4: standardise process noise using only within-subject variance, not the total). Unstandardised `Q_Δt` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`. The continuous standardisation `q / (−q / (2 a)) = −2 a` is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`. `Q_Δt / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `DIFFUSIONstd` is `q / (−q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4: standardise process noise using only within-subject variance, not the total). Unstandardised `q` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`. The discrete standardisation `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a)) = 1 − exp(2 a Δt)` depends on the event interval and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`. `q / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `DRIFTstd` is the continuous auto-effect after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4: standardise `DRIFT` using only within-subject variance, not the total). Unstandardised `a` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DRIFTstd`. The discrete standardisation `e^{a Δt}` depends on the event interval and is not `DRIFTstd`. `a p / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DRIFTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` is `(-B / a) · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (footnote 4: standardise using only the relevant variance, not the total; the affecting variance is `TIPREDVAR`; the affected variance is `asymDIFFUSION`). Unstandardised `-B / a` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`. The finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`. `(-B / a) · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (footnote 4: standardise using only the relevant variance, not the total; the affecting variance is `TIPREDVAR`; the affected variance is `asymDIFFUSION`). Unstandardised `B` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`. The asymptotic standardisation `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`. The finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `B · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Table 3 / p. 16 `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_b · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` `p_0` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (footnote 4: standardise using only the relevant variance, not the total; the affecting variance is `TIPREDVAR`; the affected variance is free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`). Unstandardised `t0_b` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `TIPREDEFFECTstd` `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` uses `asymDIFFUSION` and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `t0_b · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `t0_b² v` (`T0TIPREDEFFECT %*% TIPREDVAR %*% t(T0TIPREDEFFECT)` immediately after `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`). A zero coefficient or zero predictor variance is exactly zero. Free `T0TIPREDEFFECT` does not require `a < 0`. `(B / a)² v` is `addedTIPREDVAR` and is not this first-occasion map. `t0_b · √v / √p_0` is `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` and is not this variance. Free `T0VAR` is not this extra TI variance. `TRAITVAR` is not this extra TI variance. Equation 5 of 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `λ² t0_b² v`. Form `t0_b² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`. A zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero. `t0_b² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra. `λ² p_0 + θ` is first-occasion observed variance, not this extra. `λ² (B / a)² v` is Eq. 5 of `addedTIPREDVAR`, not this first-occasion observed extra. `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra. Equation 5 of §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `λ² (B / a)² v`. Form `(B / a)² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`. A zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero. Lasting asymptotic extra requires `a < 0`. `(B / a)² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra. `λ² t0_b² v` is first-occasion extra observed TI variance, not this extra. `λ² p + θ` is stationary observed variance, not this extra. `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra. Page 16 `TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `m · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive time-dependent predictor variance `v` (footnote 4: standardise using only the relevant variance, not the total; the affecting variance is the TD predictor; the affected variance is `asymDIFFUSION`). Unstandardised `M` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`. `TIPREDEFFECTstd` `B · √v / √p` is a different named matrix even when `M = B`. The finite-interval intercept-style standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] M · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`. `m · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Table 3 / p. 16 `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_m · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` `p_0` and strictly positive time-dependent predictor variance `v` (footnote 4: standardise using only the relevant variance, not the total; the affecting variance is the TD predictor, not `TIPREDVAR`; the affected variance is free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`). Unstandardised `t0_m` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`. `TDPREDEFFECTstd` `m · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` uses `asymDIFFUSION` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`. `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` `t0_b · √v / √p_0` is a different named matrix even when `t0_m = t0_b`. `t0_m · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Free `T0VAR` does not require `a < 0`. Page 16 `T0VARstd` is the correlation form `solve(sqrt(diag(T0VAR))) %&% T0VAR` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` `p_0` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; the default ridge is 0; the scalar map is `p_0 / p_0 = 1`). Unstandardised `T0VAR` is defined for a zero first-occasion variance and is not `T0VARstd`. Zero `p_0` fails closed. Distinct positive `p_0` recover the same 1. `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` `t0_m · √v / √p_0` depends on `p_0` and is not `T0VARstd`. `addedT0TIPREDVAR` `t0_b² v` is extra TI variance, not this correlation. `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance. Page 16 `TRAITVARstd` is the correlation form `solve(sqrt(diag(TRAITVAR))) %&% TRAITVAR` after strictly positive `TRAITVAR` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms it only when `TRAITVAR != 0`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; unlike `T0VARstd` there is no ridge addend; the scalar map is `trait / trait = 1`). Unstandardised `TRAITVAR` is defined for a zero trait and is not `TRAITVARstd`. Zero `TRAITVAR` fails closed. Distinct positive `trait` recover the same 1. `T0VARstd` `p_0 / p_0 = 1` recovers the same number and remains a distinct named quantity. `addedT0TIPREDVAR` `t0_b² v` is extra TI variance, not this correlation. `TRAITVAR` does not require `a < 0`. Page 16 `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` is the correlation form `solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTTRAITVAR))) %&% MANIFESTTRAITVAR` after strictly positive `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms it only when `MANIFESTTRAITVAR != 0`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; unlike `TRAITVARstd` the 2017-era source adds ridging; the default ridge is 0; the scalar map is `ψ / ψ = 1`). Unstandardised `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is defined for a zero trait and is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`. Zero `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` fails closed. Distinct positive `ψ` recover the same 1. `TRAITVARstd` `trait / trait = 1` recovers the same number and remains a distinct named quantity. `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is measurement error, not this correlation. `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` does not require `a < 0`. Page 16 `MANIFESTVARstd` is the correlation form `solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTVAR))) %&% MANIFESTVAR` after strictly positive `MANIFESTVAR` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms it whenever `verbose = TRUE`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; unlike `TRAITVARstd` the 2017-era source adds ridging; the default ridge is 0; the 2017-era `dimnames` assignment to `latentNames` is a source bug; the scalar map is `θ / θ = 1`). Unstandardised `MANIFESTVAR` is defined for a zero residual and is not `MANIFESTVARstd`. Zero `MANIFESTVAR` makes `solve(sqrt(0))` fail and fails closed. Distinct positive `θ` recover the same 1. `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` `ψ / ψ = 1` recovers the same number and remains a distinct named quantity. Equation 5 `λ² Var(η) + θ` is `Var(y)`, not this correlation. `MANIFESTVAR` does not require `a < 0`. Page 16 `TIPREDVARstd` is the correlation form `solve(sqrt(diag(TIPREDVAR))) %&% TIPREDVAR` after strictly positive `TIPREDVAR` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms it whenever `verbose = TRUE` and `n.TIpred > 0`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; unlike `TRAITVARstd` the 2017-era source adds ridging; the default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `TIpredNames`; the scalar map is `v / v = 1`). Unstandardised `TIPREDVAR` is defined for a zero predictor and is not `TIPREDVARstd`. Zero `TIPREDVAR` makes `solve(sqrt(0))` fail and fails closed. Distinct positive `v` recover the same 1. `MANIFESTVARstd` `θ / θ = 1` recovers the same number and remains a distinct named quantity. Section 7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` `(B / a)² v` is extra process variance, not this correlation. `TIPREDVAR` does not require `a < 0`. Page 16 `asymDIFFUSIONstd` is the correlation form `solve(sqrt(diag(asymDIFFUSION))) %&% asymDIFFUSION` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms it whenever `verbose = TRUE`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; the 2017-era source adds ridging; the default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `latentNames`; the scalar map is `p / p = 1`). Unstandardised `asymDIFFUSION` is defined for a zero process and is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd`. Zero `q` makes `solve(sqrt(0))` fail and fails closed. Distinct positive `p` recover the same 1. `TIPREDVARstd` `v / v = 1` recovers the same number and remains a distinct named quantity. `DIFFUSIONstd` `q / p = −2 a` is the continuous-diffusion ratio, not this correlation. Lasting `asymDIFFUSION` requires `a < 0`. Page 16 `discreteCINTstd` is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms unstandardised `discreteCINT` whenever `verbose = TRUE` as `solve(DRIFT) %*% (discreteDRIFT − I) %*% CINT`; that source does not form a `discreteCINTstd` matrix; the scalar map is the footnote 4 standardisation of that named discrete intercept). Unstandardised `discreteCINT` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteCINTstd`. Zero `q` has no positive process SD and fails closed. `κ / √p` does not depend on `Δt` and is not this finite-interval map. `(-κ / a) / √p` is the standardised asymptotic intercept and is not this map. Lasting `asymDIFFUSION` requires `a < 0`. Page 16 `asymCINTstd` is `(-κ / a) / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms unstandardised `asymCINT` whenever `verbose = TRUE` as `-solve(DRIFT) %*% CINT`; that source does not form an `asymCINTstd` matrix; the scalar map is the footnote 4 standardisation of that named asymptotic intercept). Unstandardised `asymCINT` is defined for a zero process and is not `asymCINTstd`. Zero `q` has no positive process SD and fails closed. `κ / √p` is the continuous intercept standardisation and is not this total-change map. `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ / √p` depends on the event interval and is not this `Δt → ∞` map. Lasting `asymDIFFUSION` requires `a < 0`. Page 16 `T0MEANSstd` is `μ_0 / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` `p_0` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms unstandardised `T0MEANS` and does not form a `T0MEANSstd` matrix; the scalar map is the footnote 4 standardisation of that named first-occasion mean; relevant variance is free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`). Unstandardised `T0MEANS` is defined for a zero first-occasion variance and is not `T0MEANSstd`. Zero `p_0` has no positive SD and fails closed. `T0VARstd` `p_0 / p_0 = 1` recovers the same number when `μ_0 = √p_0` and remains a distinct named quantity. `μ_0 / √asymDIFFUSION` uses process-dynamics variance and is not this first-occasion map. Free `T0MEANS` does not require `a < 0`. Page 16 `MANIFESTMEANSstd` is `τ / √θ` after strictly positive `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` (2017-era `summary.ctsemFit.R` forms unstandardised `MANIFESTMEANS` and does not form a `MANIFESTMEANSstd` matrix; the scalar map is the footnote 4 standardisation of that named measurement intercept; relevant variance is residual `MANIFESTVAR`, not total observed `Var(y)`). Unstandardised `MANIFESTMEANS` is defined for a zero residual and is not `MANIFESTMEANSstd`. Zero `θ` has no positive SD and fails closed. `MANIFESTVARstd` `θ / θ = 1` recovers the same number when `τ = √θ` and remains a distinct named quantity. `τ / √(λ² Var(η) + θ)` uses total observed variance and is not this residual map. `MANIFESTMEANS` does not require `a < 0`.
 
 ## Authoritative sources
 
@@ -135,6 +136,7 @@ The Voelkle et al. (2012) ZORA accepted manuscript was re-opened 2026-08-18T21:0
 ## Formula notes
 
 - **CWC.** For cluster \(i\) and occasion \(t\), \(x_{it}^{w} = x_{it}-\bar x_{i}\) and \(y_{it}^{w} = y_{it}-\bar y_{i}\). The within slope is OLS of \(y^{w}\) on \(x^{w}\). The between slope is OLS of the cluster means. A grand-mean pooled slope confounds the two.
+- **Occasion-mean centering.** Hamaker, Kuiper, and Grasman (2015, Eq. 1a–1b; UvA-DARE PDF opened 2026-09-03T06:07Z KST): \(x_{it}=\mu_t+p_{it}\) where \(\mu_t\) is the grand mean at occasion \(t\), not the sample-wide grand mean and not the person mean. The temporal deviations \(p_{it}\) still contain trait-like between-person differences. Lagged relations on those residuals are CLPM lags, not within-person lags. RI-CLPM (their Eq. 3a) further subtracts a person-specific random intercept and is not this slice. Unaligned event times have no shared occasion and fail closed. Consecutive aligned waves may have unequal spacing; each pair keeps its own \(\Delta t\).
 - **Contextual effect.** Enders and Tofighi (2007, Table 2, pp. 124–127): under CWC, the cluster-mean coefficient \(\gamma_{01}\) is the contextual effect (expected difference between two people with the same individual \(X\) from groups one unit apart on \(\bar X\)). Under CGM the same symbol is the between-cluster effect. The OLS identity is \(\gamma_{01}^{\mathrm{CWC}}=\beta_{\mathrm{between}}-\beta_{\mathrm{within}}\). Adding the CWC contextual coefficient to the within slope recovers the between-cluster slope. This crate reports the OLS analogue; it does not estimate their multilevel maximum-likelihood model.
 - **Kish ESS.** \(\mathrm{ESS}=(\sum w)^{2}/\sum w^{2}\) on non-negative finite weights. WLS uses the weights in the slope; ESS is not a second slope.
 - **Exact scalar map.** Voelkle et al. (2012, Eq. 7) and Driver et al. (2017, Eq. 3): \(\varphi = A^{*}(\Delta t)=\exp(a\,\Delta t)\). The inverse is \(a=\ln\varphi/\Delta t\). The forward map is the same equation. The real exponential is strictly positive; a binary64 underflow to `+0` is refused because the inverse logarithm does not exist at zero. The difference quotient \((x(t+\Delta t)-x(t))/\Delta t\) is refused.
diff --git a/docs/research/posterior-esem-input-gates.md b/docs/research/posterior-esem-input-gates.md
index 9ec541eed..a710a72a9 100644
--- a/docs/research/posterior-esem-input-gates.md
+++ b/docs/research/posterior-esem-input-gates.md
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ This slice delivers the first executable ADR 0005 contract in `psychometric_core
 6. refuse latent-mean comparison unless typed invariance evidence carries a strong or strict two-group OLS status (`LatentMeanComparisonEvidence`; metric/configural evidence cannot reduce to a passing flag), and recover a mean difference only under that strong or strict status (Putnick & Bornstein, 2016: scalar licenses means; residual invariance is not required; two-observation series cap at strong because residual variance is identically `0`);
 7. refuse causal language that rests only on temporal precedence, document linkage, event tracking, or model prediction.
 
-Cluster-mean CWC, the CWC contextual effect, Kish WLS, event-time log-rate, CWC-then-lag, irregular already-centered residual log-rate, the Driver Eq. 5 of the Eq. 3 evolved mean, the Driver Eq. 3 contemporaneous `TDPREDEFFECT` impulse, the Driver Eq. 5 of that contemporaneous impulse, the Driver Eq. 1–2 within-interval impulse carry, the Driver Eq. 5 of that carried latent mean, the Driver Eq. 3 `TIPREDEFFECT` increment, and the Driver Eq. 5 of that increment live in the same crate and are documented in `docs/research/multilevel-event-time-recovery.md`. Full ESEM/set-ESEM, formative composites, DSEM, and matrix continuous-time dynamics remain accepted-target.
+Cluster-mean CWC, the CWC contextual effect, Kish WLS, event-time log-rate, CWC-then-lag, irregular already-centered residual log-rate, occasion-mean residual log-rate (Hamaker et al., 2015, Eq. 1a; not within-person; not RI-CLPM), the Driver Eq. 5 of the Eq. 3 evolved mean, the Driver Eq. 3 contemporaneous `TDPREDEFFECT` impulse, the Driver Eq. 5 of that contemporaneous impulse, the Driver Eq. 1–2 within-interval impulse carry, the Driver Eq. 5 of that carried latent mean, the Driver Eq. 3 `TIPREDEFFECT` increment, and the Driver Eq. 5 of that increment live in the same crate and are documented in `docs/research/multilevel-event-time-recovery.md`. Full ESEM/set-ESEM, formative composites, DSEM, and matrix continuous-time dynamics remain accepted-target.
 
 ## Authoritative sources
 
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structura
 
 Driver, C. C., Oud, J. H. L., & Voelkle, M. C. (2017). Continuous time structural equation modeling with R package ctsem. *Journal of Statistical Software, 77*(5), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v077.i05
 
+Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. *Psychological Methods, 20*(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
+
 Mislevy, R. J. (1991). Randomization-based inference about latent variables from complex samples. *Psychometrika, 56*(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294457
 
 Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. *Developmental Review, 41*, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.003