Remove Housing Evaluations

Members will now receive two Housing Points upon receiving a Passing status for
Membership Evaluations

Author: liam-middlebrook

articles.pdf

@@ -250,38 +250,16 @@
 \end{enumerate}
 
 \bsection{Evaluations Processes}
-During the academic year, a House member is evaluated by two different processes.
-The first process, known as the Housing Evaluation, is an informal evaluation designed to recognize an individual's contributions to the House, as well as checkpoint an individual's involvement with the House.
-The second process, known as the Membership Evaluation, is responsible for determining those individuals who will have the option to continue Active Membership in the following year.
-These processes are separate from each other and should not interfere with one another.
+During the academic year, a House member is evaluated by the Membership Evaluation process.
+Membership Evaluation, is responsible for determining those individuals who will have the option to continue Active Membership in the following year.
 Semi-Annual Evaluations Meetings are open only to all current Active Members.
 All Executive Board members are expected to attend the Semi-Annual Evaluations Meetings to assist in the evaluations of House members.
 \\* \\*
 At the beginning of any Evaluation Process listed herein, the Evaluations Director must read the sections of the Computer Science House Constitution and By-Laws used during the respective Evaluation Process.
 It is incumbent upon each House member to provide the Evaluation Director with whatever information he or she feels is necessary to ensure an accurate evaluation.
-\bsubsection{Housing Evaluation}
-The Housing Evaluation process occurs during the academic year.
-It is performed late Spring Semester before or concurrently with the Membership Evaluation and is chaired by the Evaluations Director.
-The Housing Evaluation is used to recognize an individual’s contributions to the House and distribute Housing Points (see \ref{Housing Priority System}).
-\\* \\*
-All Active members who wish to be evaluated are required to submit an activity report in which they may log projects worked on, social events and seminars hosted or attended, and any other information they deem relevant.
-A member’s failure to submit the activity report will result in that member receiving no housing points.
-Attendance is also required for a member to be evaluated, else they will receive no housing points.
-Any member unable to attend because of outstanding circumstances (e.g. away on co-op) may also submit an activity report and be voted on, though they may not vote.
-Members in this situation should contact the Evaluations Director at least one day prior to the evaluation.
-\\* \\*
-The participating members, on a member by member basis, review the activity report provided by each member.
-The participating members may then choose to award one, two, or three housing points to each member.
-Points are awarded on the basis of contributions to House.
-Above average members receive three points, average members two points, and below average members one point.
-\\* \\*
-A quorum of two-thirds of the Total Number of Possible Votes is required for the evaluation to be valid.
-Neither Absentee nor Proxy votes are allowed.
-\\* \\*
-All votes during the Housing Evaluation Process must be Closed Ballot, Three Tiered Vote as defined in \ref{Three Tiered}.
 \bsubsection{Membership Evaluation}
 The Membership Evaluation process occurs once per academic year. It is performed as part of the Evaluation Process that takes place during the spring semester to comply with RIT Housing deadlines.
-\bsubsubsection{Voting} 
+\bsubsubsection{Voting}
 A quorum of members, on a member by member basis, ensures that each Active member has met the minimum requirements in order to continue as an Active member in the following year.
 All Active Members will be held to the requirements and evaluated unless they received an exemption from the Executive Board prior to the event.
 These requirements are detailed in Article V under expectations for each category of membership.
@@ -291,6 +269,7 @@
 House may choose any of the Outcomes for each member.
 \bsubsubsection{Outcomes}
 Members who receive a pass have the option participate as an Active Member in the following the year and remain on the upcoming roster if applicable.
+Members who receive a pass will gain two Housing Points.
 \\* \\*
 If a member fails and has never passed an Membership Evaluation in the past, their membership will be revoked immediately.
 If the member has previously passed an Membership Evaluation they will move to Alumni Membership status at the end of the Standard Operating Session (\ref{Alumni Membership Selection}).
@@ -331,7 +310,7 @@
 \bsection{Housing Priority System}
 The Housing Priority System is a means for determining the priority a House member has in a Housing issue such as Single Room Assignment or the Assignment of Available Housing.
 The member with top priority is the member with on-floor status and the most Housing Priority Points.
-Housing points are accumulated during the Housing Evaluation described in \ref{Housing Evaluation}.
+Housing points are accumulated during the Membership Evaluation \ref{Membership Evaluation}.
 \\* \\*
 In the event of a tie, the members will be approached simultaneously and if they are unable to decide fairly between themselves, the assignment of priority will be made by random selection of the tied members.
 \bsubsection{Single Room Assignments}