Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tr/patches #1159

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 20, 2024
Merged

Tr/patches #1159

merged 5 commits into from
Aug 20, 2024

Conversation

mrT23
Copy link
Collaborator

@mrT23 mrT23 commented Aug 20, 2024

PR Type

Enhancement


Description

  • Enhanced patch extension functionality:
    • Added filename parameter to extend_patch function
    • Implemented skip logic for specific file types (e.g., .md, .txt)
    • Introduced dynamic context settings for patch extension
  • Updated PR processing to utilize the enhanced patch extension
  • Modified configuration:
    • Updated fallback model to "gpt-4o-2024-05-13"
    • Added skip_types configuration for patch extension logic
  • Improved PR code suggestions and reviewer prompts:
    • Clarified instructions to focus on new code lines in PR diff
    • Updated example diff format for better understanding
    • Refined security concerns review instructions

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
git_patch_processing.py
Enhance patch extension with file-specific logic                 

pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py

  • Added filename parameter to extend_patch function
  • Implemented skip logic for certain file types
  • Added dynamic context settings
  • +9/-1     
    pr_processing.py
    Update PR processing to use enhanced patch extension         

    pr_agent/algo/pr_processing.py

  • Updated pr_generate_extended_diff function to pass filename to
    extend_patch
  • +1/-1     
    pr_code_suggestions_prompts.toml
    Improve PR code suggestions prompt clarity                             

    pr_agent/settings/pr_code_suggestions_prompts.toml

  • Refined instructions for PR code review and suggestions
  • Clarified focus on new code lines in PR diff
  • Updated example diff format for clarity
  • +28/-24 
    pr_reviewer_prompts.toml
    Enhance PR reviewer prompt for better reviews                       

    pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml

  • Updated instructions for PR review focus
  • Refined example diff format
  • Clarified security concerns review instructions
  • +16/-13 
    Configuration changes
    configuration.toml
    Update configuration for models and patch extension           

    pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml

  • Updated fallback model
  • Added skip_types configuration for patch extension logic
  • +3/-2     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🏅 Score: 92
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    🔀 Multiple PR themes

    Sub-PR theme: Enhance patch extension functionality

    Relevant files:

    • pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py
    • pr_agent/algo/pr_processing.py

    Sub-PR theme: Update configuration settings

    Relevant files:

    • pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml

    Sub-PR theme: Improve PR review prompts

    Relevant files:

    • pr_agent/settings/pr_code_suggestions_prompts.toml
    • pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml

    ⚡ Key issues to review

    Error Handling
    The new skip logic for specific file types doesn't handle potential errors when accessing the configuration. Consider adding error handling for cases where the configuration might be missing or invalid.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Aug 20, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Enhancement
    Rephrase security concerns question for conciseness and clarity

    Consider rephrasing the security concerns question to be more concise and direct,
    while maintaining its comprehensive nature.

    pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml [104]

    -security_concerns: str = Field(description="Does this PR code introduce possible vulnerabilities such as exposure of sensitive information (e.g., API keys, secrets, passwords), or security concerns like SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, and others ? Answer 'No' (without explaining why) if there are no possible issues. If there are security concerns or issues, start your answer with a short header, such as: 'Sensitive information exposure: ...', 'SQL injection: ...' etc. Explain your answer. Be specific and give examples if possible")
    +security_concerns: str = Field(description="Identify any security vulnerabilities (e.g., sensitive information exposure, SQL injection, XSS, CSRF) introduced by this PR. Answer 'No' if none. For issues, provide a header (e.g., 'SQL injection: ...'), explanation, and examples.")
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: The suggestion significantly improves the clarity and conciseness of the security concerns question, which is crucial for effective security reviews.

    8
    Remove redundant instruction about focusing on new code lines

    Consider removing the redundant instruction about focusing on new code lines, as
    it's already mentioned in the previous paragraph.

    pr_agent/settings/pr_code_suggestions_prompts.toml [157]

    -- The suggestions should focus on improving only the new code introduced the PR, meaning lines from '__new hunk__' sections, starting with '+' (after the line numbers).
    +# Remove this line entirely as it's redundant
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: The suggestion enhances code clarity by removing redundant information, but it's a minor improvement.

    5
    Maintainability
    ✅ Rename configuration option for clarity
    Suggestion Impact:The commit directly implemented the suggested change, renaming the configuration option from 'skip_types' to 'patch_extension_skip_types'

    code diff:

    -skip_types =[".md",".txt"]
    +patch_extension_skip_types =[".md",".txt"]

    Consider using a more specific name for the skip_types configuration option to
    better reflect its purpose in the context of patch extension.

    pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml [23]

    -skip_types =[".md",".txt"]
    +patch_extension_skip_types = [".md", ".txt"]
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion improves code maintainability by using a more specific and descriptive name for the configuration option.

    7
    Performance
    Simplify the any() function call by removing unnecessary list creation

    Consider using a list comprehension instead of the any() function with a generator
    expression for better readability and potentially slightly improved performance.

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [24]

    -if any([filename.endswith(skip_type) for skip_type in skip_types]):
    +if any(filename.endswith(skip_type) for skip_type in skip_types):
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: The suggestion improves code readability and slightly enhances performance by removing unnecessary list creation.

    6

    @qodo-ai qodo-ai deleted a comment from qodo-merge-pro bot Aug 20, 2024
    @mrT23 mrT23 merged commit 772499f into main Aug 20, 2024
    2 checks passed
    @mrT23 mrT23 deleted the tr/patches branch August 20, 2024 08:41
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants