支持前端使能/禁用代码折叠 #5640
支持前端使能/禁用代码折叠 #5640
Conversation
|
@code-october is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several enhancements across multiple components to implement code folding functionality. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Your build has completed! |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
app/components/markdown.tsx (2)
172-176: LGTM! Consider using object destructuring for cleaner code.The implementation of
enableCodeFoldlooks good and correctly considers both session-specific and global configurations. This aligns well with the PR objectives.Consider using object destructuring for a cleaner code:
const { currentSession, useAppConfig } = useChatStore(); const session = currentSession(); const { enableCodeFold: globalEnableCodeFold } = useAppConfig(); const enableCodeFold = session.mask?.enableCodeFold !== false && globalEnableCodeFold;This approach reduces the number of variables and makes the code more concise.
Line range hint
205-211: LGTM! Consider extracting the button rendering logic.The "Show More" button rendering now correctly depends on both
showToggleandenableCodeFold, which is consistent with the new feature implementation.Consider extracting the button rendering logic into a separate function for better readability:
const renderShowMoreButton = () => { if (showToggle && enableCodeFold && collapsed) { return ( <div className={`show-hide-button ${collapsed ? "collapsed" : "expanded"}`}> <button onClick={toggleCollapsed}>{Locale.NewChat.More}</button> </div> ); } return null; }; // Then in the return statement: {renderShowMoreButton()}This approach improves code organization and makes the component's structure clearer.
app/locales/cn.ts (1)
668-671: LGTM! Consider a minor improvement for consistency.The addition of the
CodeFoldproperty to theMask.Configobject is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. The Chinese translations are clear and accurately describe the feature.For consistency with other boolean config options in this file, consider changing the
Titleto "启用代码折叠" instead of "启用CodeFold". This would make it more aligned with the Chinese language style used throughout the file.CodeFold: { - Title: "启用CodeFold", + Title: "启用代码折叠", SubTitle: "启用之后可以折叠/展开过长的代码块", },app/components/mask.tsx (3)
Line range hint
1-24: Consider organizing imports and removing unused onesThe import section is quite long and may contain unused imports. Consider organizing them and removing any that are not used in the file.
To help identify unused imports, you can run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify potentially unused imports echo "Potentially unused imports:" rg --type typescript --type javascript -n "^import .* from" app/components/mask.tsx | while read -r line; do import=$(echo "$line" | awk -F'import ' '{print $2}' | awk -F' from' '{print $1}') if ! rg -q "$import" --type typescript --type javascript app/components/mask.tsx; then echo "$line" fi done
Line range hint
1-1000: Consider splitting the file into smaller, more focused componentsThis file is quite long and contains multiple components (
MaskConfig,ContextPromptItem,ContextPrompts,MaskPage). Consider splitting these into separate files for better maintainability and readability.To help with this refactoring, you could create separate files for each main component and then import them in a main
mask.tsxfile. For example:
MaskConfig.tsxContextPrompts.tsx(includingContextPromptItem)MaskPage.tsxThis would make the codebase more modular and easier to navigate.
Line range hint
4-4: TODO comment: Add testsThere's a TODO comment to add tests. It's important to ensure proper test coverage for the components in this file.
Would you like me to generate some basic test cases for the components in this file? I can create a new issue to track this task if you prefer.
app/locales/en.ts (1)
678-682: LGTM with a minor suggestion for clarity.The addition of the CodeFold configuration option is well-structured and aligns with the existing localization patterns. The description is clear and informative.
Consider a slight rewording of the subtitle for better clarity:
CodeFold: { Title: "Enable CodeFold", SubTitle: - "Automatically collapse/expand overly long code block when enable CodeFold", + "Automatically collapse/expand overly long code blocks when CodeFold is enabled", },This minor change improves readability and grammatical correctness.
app/components/settings.tsx (1)
1512-1526: LGTM! Consider adding a data-testid attribute for easier testing.The implementation of the code folding setting is well-structured and follows the existing patterns in the file. It correctly uses localization for internationalization and properly implements the checkbox state and update logic.
For consistency with best practices and to facilitate easier testing, consider adding a
data-testidattribute to the input element.Here's a suggested minor improvement:
<input aria-label={Locale.Mask.Config.CodeFold.Title} type="checkbox" checked={config.enableCodeFold} + data-testid="enable-code-fold-checkbox" onChange={(e) => updateConfig( (config) => (config.enableCodeFold = e.currentTarget.checked), ) } ></input>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- app/components/markdown.tsx (2 hunks)
- app/components/mask.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/components/settings.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/locales/cn.ts (1 hunks)
- app/locales/en.ts (1 hunks)
- app/store/config.ts (1 hunks)
- app/store/mask.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
app/store/mask.ts (1)
22-22: LGTM! Verify usage in related components.The addition of the
enableCodeFoldproperty to theMasktype is appropriate and aligns with the PR objective. The optional nature of the property ensures backward compatibility.To ensure proper implementation, please verify the usage of this new property in related components. Run the following script to check for its usage:
✅ Verification successful
Verified! The
enableCodeFoldproperty is correctly implemented and consistently used across all relevant components, ensuring both functionality and backward compatibility.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of enableCodeFold in components # Search for enableCodeFold in all TypeScript and TypeScript React files rg --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type-add 'ts:*.ts' -t ts -t tsx 'enableCodeFold'Length of output: 936
app/store/config.ts (1)
55-56: LGTM! Consider enhancing the comment and verifying migration handling.The addition of the
enableCodeFoldoption aligns well with the PR objectives and provides the desired functionality to enable/disable code folding. Good job on maintaining backward compatibility by setting it totrueby default.A couple of suggestions:
- Consider expanding the comment slightly for clarity:
enableCodeFold: true, // Enable/disable code folding in the UI
- Verify if the new
enableCodeFoldoption needs any special handling in themergeandmigratefunctions at the bottom of this file. If not, please confirm that the default handling is sufficient.app/components/markdown.tsx (2)
199-199: LGTM! The maxHeight style is correctly updated.The
maxHeightstyle property now correctly considers theenableCodeFoldvariable, which is consistent with the new feature implementation.
Line range hint
1-338: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objectives.The implementation of the code folding feature is well-done, considering both session-specific and global configurations. This provides the desired flexibility for users to enable or disable code folding as needed. The changes are localized to the
CustomCodecomponent, which is appropriate for this feature.A few minor suggestions have been made to improve code readability and organization, but these are not critical for the functionality. Great job on implementing this new feature!
app/locales/cn.ts (1)
668-671: Summary: Localization strings added for code folding featureThe changes to this file are minimal and focused, adding only the necessary Chinese localization strings for the new code folding feature. These additions are well-integrated into the existing
Mask.Configobject and maintain consistency with the file's overall structure and style.The new strings will enable Chinese-speaking users to understand and use the code folding feature effectively.
app/components/mask.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-1000: Summary: Good implementation with room for improvementThe new code folding feature is well-implemented and integrates smoothly with the existing component structure. However, there are some areas for improvement:
- The file is quite long and could benefit from being split into smaller, more focused components.
- There may be unused imports that could be removed.
- There's a TODO comment for adding tests that should be addressed.
Overall, the changes are approved, but consider the suggested improvements for better maintainability and code organization.
186-202: New feature: Code folding option addedThe new code segment introduces a checkbox for enabling/disabling code folding. This feature is well-integrated into the existing
MaskConfigcomponent and follows the same pattern as other configuration options.A few observations:
- The feature is conditionally rendered based on
globalConfig.enableCodeFold.- The checkbox state is linked to
props.mask.enableCodeFold.- The implementation is consistent with other similar features in the component.
To ensure this feature is properly integrated, let's verify its usage:
✅ Verification successful
Action Required: Update Verification Script for Accurate Results
The previous verification script encountered errors due to unrecognized file types. To accurately verify the usage of
enableCodeFold, please execute the updated script below:
Action Required: Update Verification Script to Use File Patterns Instead of Type Specifiers
The previous verification script encountered errors due to unrecognized file types. To accurately search for
enableCodeFold, please execute the updated script below:
Verification Successful:
enableCodeFoldis Properly IntegratedThe
enableCodeFoldfeature is consistently implemented across the codebase, including inapp/components/mask.tsxand related files. No issues were found regarding its integration or usage.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of enableCodeFold in the codebase # Check for enableCodeFold in global config echo "Checking global config for enableCodeFold:" rg "enableCodeFold" --type typescript --type javascript # Check for enableCodeFold in mask-related files echo "\nChecking mask-related files for enableCodeFold:" rg "enableCodeFold" --type typescript --type javascript -g "*mask*"Length of output: 397
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of enableCodeFold in the codebase # Check for enableCodeFold in global config echo "Checking global config for enableCodeFold:" rg "enableCodeFold" -t ts -t tsx -t js -t jsx # Check for enableCodeFold in mask-related files echo -e "\nChecking mask-related files for enableCodeFold:" rg "enableCodeFold" -t ts -t tsx -t js -t jsx -g "*mask*"Length of output: 365
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of enableCodeFold in the codebase # Check for enableCodeFold in global config echo "Checking global config for enableCodeFold:" rg "enableCodeFold" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.js" -g "*.jsx" # Check for enableCodeFold in mask-related files echo -e "\nChecking mask-related files for enableCodeFold:" rg "enableCodeFold" -g "*mask*" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.js" -g "*.jsx"Length of output: 2061
app/components/settings.tsx (1)
1512-1526: Verify the implementation of code folding in other parts of the application.The addition of the code folding setting is well-implemented in the settings component. However, to ensure full functionality, we should verify that this setting is respected in the relevant parts of the application where code folding is applied.
Please run the following script to check for the usage of
enableCodeFoldin other parts of the application:✅ Verification successful
Please run the following corrected script to check for the usage of
enableCodeFoldin other parts of the application:
Please run the following corrected script to check for the usage of
enableCodeFoldin other parts of the application:
The implementation of
enableCodeFoldis properly integrated across the application.The
enableCodeFoldsetting is consistently used in relevant components and configurations, ensuring that the code folding functionality is respected throughout the application.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of enableCodeFold in the codebase # Search for enableCodeFold usage echo "Searching for enableCodeFold usage:" rg --type typescript --type tsx 'enableCodeFold' # Search for potential code folding implementation echo "\nSearching for potential code folding implementation:" rg --type typescript --type tsx 'fold|collapse|expand'Length of output: 375
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of enableCodeFold in the codebase # Search for enableCodeFold usage echo "Searching for enableCodeFold usage:" rg --type ts --type tsx 'enableCodeFold' # Search for potential code folding implementation echo -e "\nSearching for potential code folding implementation:" rg --type ts --type tsx 'fold|collapse|expand'Length of output: 347
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of enableCodeFold in the codebase # Search for enableCodeFold usage echo "Searching for enableCodeFold usage:" rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" 'enableCodeFold' # Search for potential code folding implementation echo -e "\nSearching for potential code folding implementation:" rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" 'fold|collapse|expand'Length of output: 2372
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
app/components/settings.tsx (1)
1512-1527: LGTM! Consider adding an ARIA label to the checkbox.The implementation of the code folding toggle is well-integrated into the existing settings structure. It correctly uses localization and follows the established patterns for other settings. The data-testid attribute is a good addition for testing purposes.
To improve accessibility, consider adding an aria-label to the checkbox input. You can use the same localization string as the title:
<input aria-label={Locale.Mask.Config.CodeFold.Title} type="checkbox" checked={config.enableCodeFold} data-testid="enable-code-fold-checkbox" + aria-label={Locale.Mask.Config.CodeFold.Title} onChange={(e) => updateConfig( (config) => (config.enableCodeFold = e.currentTarget.checked), ) } ></input>app/components/markdown.tsx (2)
175-176: Use strict inequality operator!==for accurate comparisonUsing
!= falsecan lead to unexpected results due to type coercion. It's safer to use!== falsefor strict boolean comparison.Apply this diff to improve type safety:
- const enableCodeFold = - session.mask?.enableCodeFold != false && config.enableCodeFold; + const enableCodeFold = + session.mask?.enableCodeFold !== false && config.enableCodeFold;
209-209: Consider making themaxHeightvalue configurableHardcoding the value
"400px"may reduce flexibility. Consider defining it as a constant or making it configurable to enhance maintainability and adaptability.Apply this diff to improve the code:
+ const MAX_CODE_FOLD_HEIGHT = "400px"; ... <code className={props?.className} ref={ref} style={{ - maxHeight: enableCodeFold && collapsed ? "400px" : "none", + maxHeight: enableCodeFold && collapsed ? MAX_CODE_FOLD_HEIGHT : "none", overflowY: "hidden", }} >
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- app/components/markdown.tsx (2 hunks)
- app/components/settings.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/locales/cn.ts (1 hunks)
- app/locales/en.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- app/locales/cn.ts
- app/locales/en.ts
🧰 Additional context used
💻 变更类型 | Change Type
🔀 变更说明 | Description of Change
同 Artifacts 一样，有些人不想默认开启代码折叠功能，支持在客户端设置关闭代码折叠
📝 补充信息 | Additional Information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation