docs: Hotfix/upstream sync doc update #5552
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to documentation files, specifically the error messages related to upstream sync failures and instructions for manual syncing. The URLs in the error messages have been updated to point to a new repository path. Additionally, the README files have been revised to provide clearer instructions with hyperlinks directing users to relevant sections for handling sync issues. Changes
Possibly related issues
Poem
π Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI π Files selected for processing (1)
β Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@joetsuihk is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
joetsuihk
changed the title
|
Your build has completed! |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
π§Ή Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
178-179: Suggestion: Consider adding an anchor link for easier navigation.While the new instruction is clear, we could further enhance user experience by adding an anchor link directly to the "Manually Updating Code" section. This would allow users to quickly jump to the relevant information with a single click.
Consider modifying the line to:
> If you encounter a failure of Upstream Sync execution, please [manually update code](#manually-updating-code).This small change would make it even easier for users to find the necessary instructions when they encounter sync issues.
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
π Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/sync.yml (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- README_CN.md (1 hunks)
β Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/workflows/sync.yml
- README_CN.md
π Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)
178-179: Improved clarity for handling Upstream Sync failures.The change provides a more specific instruction for users when they encounter Upstream Sync failures. Instead of the vague directive to "manually sync fork once", it now directs users to a specific section of the README for guidance on manually updating the code.
This improvement aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing documentation clarity regarding fork update synchronization. It should help users more easily find the necessary information to resolve sync issues.
178-179: Overall assessment: Effective improvement in documentation clarity.The change successfully addresses the PR objectives by providing clearer instructions for users encountering Upstream Sync failures. It directs them to a specific section of the README, which should help reduce confusion and streamline the troubleshooting process.
The suggested addition of an anchor link would further enhance the user experience, making it even easier for users to find the relevant information quickly.
Great job on improving the documentation!
π» εζ΄η±»ε | Change Type
π εζ΄θ―΄ζ | Description of Change
Fixed the doc was not clear about sync fork update section, especially after some workflow had failed and looking for the bug in worflow logs.
π θ‘₯ε δΏ‘ζ― | Additional Information
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Documentation