-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 480
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Can you add a 'Select All' and persistent highlight feature? #682
Comments
This feature is truly beneficial from a visual perception standpoint. It makes the areas much clearer and allows for an overview of all positions in the entire image, enabling global highlighting when needed. |
The persistent highlight for intuitive viewing is very friendly for my eyes, especially since I use the software for over 10 hours a day for annotation and corrections. It provides a clearer view, eliminating the need to mouse over each rectangle to highlight it just to check the selected areas. |
I don't have the technical skills to adjust the model's parameters, so I can only rely on investing a lot of time and effort into bulk annotation and corrections. My goal is to train an ideal model through sheer quantity. That's why I spend a significant amount of time annotating image data every day. After long hours, my eyes get very tired. However, this highlighting feature can really ease the strain on my eyes because it's so intuitive. It allows me to focus on where to make corrections immediately, without having to spend a long time checking before I make adjustments. |
Hi @lhj5426; I understand your need very well, and I appreciate the detailed feedback you've provided about this feature. Your insights on how it would improve your workflow, especially for long annotation sessions, are valuable. I'm sorry that i currently don't have the resources to address every request, even though this one seems particularly beneficial. I hope that the community might be able to help develop this feature. Thank you for your passion and dedication to improving the tool! |
Yes, thank you for your response. At least expressing this makes me feel a bit better. Otherwise, using the software every day would be uncomfortable, 和 keeping it bottled up doesn't feel good either. I hope the community can provide some help. I really regret not pursuing programming. This is such a great tool! If I knew how to program, I could add some creative ideas myself and share them with the community. Unfortunately, I don't have those skills. |
Search before asking
Description
bandicam.2024-10-16.22-27-39-351.mp4
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1f8a70da-f8fd-4e10-8228-466b39968824
As shown in the video, I have also taken screenshots.
Please refer to the images.
First, as shown in the image, if position 1 is empty, you can quickly select all by moving the mouse to position 2 and dragging upwards.
Then, as shown in the image, when the number of labels exceeds the display capacity of the UI frame, the user must use the scrollbar on the right to scroll down to the very bottom, hold down the Shift key, and drag the scrollbar back to the top to select everything.
This method of not having a “select all” option makes copying position labels on similar pages somewhat inconvenient.
Secondly, if the highlight feature could have an on/off toggle and remain persistent, it would provide a clearer visual representation of the coverage area compared to a single rectangle. Please refer to the two comparison images.
Could an additional shortcut be added to show or hide all highlights, similar to the show/hide all rectangles function?
bandicam.2024-10-16.22-38-57-892.mp4
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e0e5f3a0-d73c-41a1-b30d-a06978cdbd60
Just like in the video, where a single keypress shows or hides rectangles, could a shortcut key be added to toggle all highlights on and off with one click? This would be extremely helpful for viewing the overall selected areas in the image. These two features have no downsides and would only improve efficiency.
Use case
No response
Additional
No response
Are you willing to submit a PR?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: