Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Human accuracy comparison to Good/Bad/Mean/Evil Gyal? #21

Open
clawsoon opened this issue Feb 11, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Human accuracy comparison to Good/Bad/Mean/Evil Gyal? #21

clawsoon opened this issue Feb 11, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@clawsoon
Copy link

@dkappe has trained a number of nets on Lichess data, with some Stockfish mixed in to fill in gaps where the Lichess data tends to be sparse (e.g. endgames after a material imbalance, where human players in most games resign). Any chance you'd be able to do a "how human does it play?" comparison against his nets to see how they stack up against the Maia nets? I've been playing the Maia 1100 net, and it misses some very obvious moves that an 1100 human would make (e.g. Maia 1100 sometimes fails to take back during an exchange, leaving the game lost). I'm wondering if his mix of human and Stockfish data might create a "more human" player than human data alone. And since you've already got the code to make those comparisons between human play and engine play... ;-)

https://github.com/dkappe/leela-chess-weights/wiki/Mean-Girl:--the-most-fun-leela-style-net
https://github.com/dkappe/leela-chess-weights/wiki/Bad-Gyal

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant