Origin of the term resource should be recorded in CLO

[linikujp]

Issue by GoogleCodeExporter
Tuesday May 12, 2015 at 11:44 GMT
Originally opened as https://github.com/linikujp/clo-ontology/issues/7

---

I think Cell Line Ontology is great to catalog all the cell lines from 
different resource. However, it would be important to keep the origin of the 
naming in the CLO.

For example, 

[   Class: CCD 1102 KERTr cell
   Term IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0002240

   Annotations
   alternative term: CCD 1102 KERTr
   seeAlso: ATCC: CRL-2310
   comment: disease: keratinocyte; HPV-16 E6/E7 transformed]

The annotation of this cell line is very poor. Maybe I am lack of background 
information. The origin of this term should be given in the CLO, since CLO 
collects cell lines from different databases. And different databases may have 
different names pointing to same object.

Dose the seeAlso here means this term and CRL-2310 means the same cell line in 
the ontology?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 3 Oct 2013 at 4:53