-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 314
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI failure: double free or corruption (fasttop) #1013
Comments
I have noticed this for a while in this CI as well and can say the following:
My best guess is that this is a regression in |
As even with the latest version of So I ran it with Unfortunately, it doesn't show anything concerning, there is just some understandable memory leakage. |
Oh, and I just realized that it runs a different command, trying again. Edit: Same result :/. I also ran it in debug mode with greatly reduced performance, and even though that makes the |
Great success! I re-ran the release version of
I will see if the same happens on the ARM version of ubuntu 22, and if not, will see if it's possible to switch the linux test to ARM. |
Unfortunately, the ARM image shows the same issue (valgrind-memcheck.out.zip), and even if it wouldn't have it doesn't look like GitHub Actions provides ARM instances. It's as unfortunate that Ubuntu 23 images aren't provided either, so there seems to be no way to circumvent the issue. Unless, of course, there is an update for the affected Would definitely love your input here, @NobodyXu . |
Maybe you could change the CI to use |
These build-types already run the journey tests prior to the one using I mean, you are right, by the looks of it the only fix is to not run the Since it runs with other transports, it's probably fine to disable it in the meantime to get CI stable again. |
Another option is to build |
Aaah, this means one could configure Yes, this seems like the way to go 🙏. |
129dc89 shows how to configure As a library user, you can now set the |
Great! The CI failure is from fork of gitoxide repository (to add something), so once you fixed it here you can close this issue. |
(Hopefully) closed via #1067. |
Current behavior 😯
From the CI:
Expected behavior 🤔
It should not failed due to double free or corruption.
Steps to reproduce 🕹
It happens in my fork after I fetch the latest commit from upstream, not sure how to reproduce it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: