You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not sure why the dev team went with KaTeX when most other Markdown editors seem to use MathJax. KaTeX is inferior in its support. For example, you can't seem to use bold font properly (which is needed for vector variables). Something like:
$E(\bf{x})$
renders fine with MathJax but in Boost you get:
KaTeX parse error: Expected 'EOF', got '\bf' at position 3: E(\̲b̲f̲{x})
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
KaTeX is much faster than MathJax and easier to implement. I think that's why the dev team adopted it.
Supporting bold italic symbol in KaTeX is discussed on here (Khan/KaTeX).
I'm not sure why the dev team went with KaTeX when most other Markdown editors seem to use MathJax. KaTeX is inferior in its support. For example, you can't seem to use bold font properly (which is needed for vector variables). Something like:
renders fine with MathJax but in Boost you get:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: