Skip to content

Conversation

@dmlyubim
Copy link

@dmlyubim dmlyubim commented Feb 8, 2021

Why are these changes needed?

Additional intermediate PPOLoss nodes saved into PPOLoss attributes for more runtime checks against them.

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

Copy link

@Edilmo Edilmo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Edilmo Edilmo merged commit 3a3d4c2 into releases/0.8.6 Feb 9, 2021
@Edilmo Edilmo deleted the dmlyubim/PPOLoss branch February 9, 2021 02:16
Edilmo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2021
#56)

* Save more intermetdiate PPOLoss nodes as PPOLoss attributes for additional runtime checks

* redundant import

* consistent naming
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants