Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Look into slayer integration #287

Open
k-chaney opened this issue Jun 24, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Look into slayer integration #287

k-chaney opened this issue Jun 24, 2019 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@k-chaney
Copy link
Collaborator

Slayer recently got ported to pytorch and is their official implementation at this point. It would be good to look into getting their functionality integrated as it would open up a lot of doors.

https://github.com/bamsumit/slayerPytorch

@k-chaney k-chaney added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 24, 2019
@k-chaney k-chaney self-assigned this Jun 24, 2019
@k-chaney
Copy link
Collaborator Author

k-chaney commented Jul 1, 2019

I'm actually at a workshop with Sumit now (and for the next 3 weeks). I've planned to sit down and talk about this in depth and maybe get something implemented. The paradigms are a bit different, but I think we can make something work.

@djsaunde
Copy link
Collaborator

djsaunde commented Jul 1, 2019

That would be awesome!

@Jbwasse2
Copy link
Contributor

Jbwasse2 commented Nov 5, 2019

I am interested in both Bindsnet and Slayer. Has there been any progress on this?

@webstorms
Copy link

Has any implementation of SLAYER been made with Bindsnet?

@Hananel-Hazan
Copy link
Collaborator

There some newer models also on the same notion. This is one of the improvements on our to-do list. Meanwhile, you can give it a try to implement and your welcome to push a PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants