From 7631c99ff329ac4d1dde95f6228c609bd5bfb275 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Beth Griggs <bethanyngriggs@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 00:02:10 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] doc: add minutes for meeting 2023-03-09

Closes: https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/830
---
 doc/meetings/2023-03-09.md | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/meetings/2023-03-09.md

diff --git a/doc/meetings/2023-03-09.md b/doc/meetings/2023-03-09.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0833024
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/meetings/2023-03-09.md
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+# Node.js Release WorkGroup Meeting 2023-03-09
+
+## Links
+
+* **Recording**: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQUApH01jRA&t=1633s
+* **GitHub Issue**: https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/830
+* **Minutes Google Doc**: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1htIwyXRwT61t89_z9SJTwaOOdE6yzCEAf0r5UqFKVKA
+
+## Present
+
+* Beth Griggs (@BethGriggs)
+* Danielle Adams (@danielleadams)
+* Juan Jose (@juanarbol)
+* Michael Zasso (@targos)
+* Rafael Gonzaga (@RafaelGSS)
+* Richard Lau (@richardlau)
+
+## Agenda
+
+## Announcements
+
+* nodejs/nodejs.org rewrite in Next.js has landed.
+  * The release post generation script now relies on the native fetch API so will need to be run on versions where it is available (Node.js 18+ by default).
+* Node.js 18.15.0 released by Juan this week.
+
+### Release Schedules
+* Release plan - v19.x Current [#793](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/793)
+  * Michael volunteered for the April release.
+* Release plan - v18.x Active LTS [#737](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/737)
+  * Danielle volunteered for the next release.
+* Release plan - v16.x Maintenance [#658](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/658)
+  * Beth volunteered to put a draft proposal together with a TBD date until we get enough content.
+  * Potential test runner PRs that we should review.
+* Release plan - v14.x Maintenance LTS [#567](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/567)
+  * We should plan for one more release to happen before EOL and consider what would be good to land (root certificate updates, or similar).
+
+### nodejs/Release
+
+* Confusion around semver-minor commits [#820](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/820)
+  * Discussed at the last meeting.
+  * PR opened to clarify the existing approach [nodejs/node#46592](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/46592)
+  * (Action) Beth to add a comment and close.
+* Plans for npm 9 [#778](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/778)
+  * Desire to discuss aligning release dates in future.
+  * Removing from the agenda.
+
+### nodejs/release-keys
+
+* v18 and v19 are signed by a public key not captured in this keyring [#21](https://github.com/nodejs/release-keys/issues/21)
+  * Keyring wasn’t updated, but should now be with Juan’s latest PR.
+  * (Action) Beth to check which keys are in the keyring and also [nodejs/release-keys#23](https://github.com/nodejs/release-keys/issues/23).
+
+## Q&A, Other
+
+* node-core-utils
+    * Link to Rafael’s security prepare PR [nodejs/node-core-utils#665](https://github.com/nodejs/node-core-utils/pull/665)
+    * Agreed to stick to a two-step approach initially until `git node land --security` functionality is added.
+    * Richard tested for the last set of security releases and noted a small issue regarding changelog links (potentially unrelated to the PR).
+    * (Richard) Suggestion to add an option to run individual steps such as regenerating the changelog.
+    * Rafael volunteered to be assigned to this.
+    * FYI of the PR for deprecation numbers [nodejs/node-core-utils#685](https://github.com/nodejs/node-core-utils/pull/685)
+* Node.js 20
+   * Rafael is planning the proposal for early April.
+   * Platforms support
+     * (Action) Create an issue capturing platforms.
+   * Reviewing toolchain requirements (gcc 10, C++ 20, etc.)
+* Proposal: notable-changes bot comment for summaries [#821](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/821)
+  * TSC label bot also suggested.
+  * Beth to take a look at implementing both as it will involve similar logic.
\ No newline at end of file