Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Imperial Fists HQs Cannot Swap Guns for Shields #3069

Closed
The4D6 opened this issue Jan 9, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #3074
Closed

Imperial Fists HQs Cannot Swap Guns for Shields #3069

The4D6 opened this issue Jan 9, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #3074

Comments

@The4D6
Copy link
Collaborator

The4D6 commented Jan 9, 2024

I may be wrong here, so feel free to correct me if I am.

Both kinds of Imperial Fists terminator praetors have the option to exchange a combi-bolter for a vigil storm shield for 10pts.

They should not have this option.

@Mayegelt
Copy link
Contributor

Mayegelt commented Jan 9, 2024

There is some interaction that kept reappearing that shouldn't.
I think it's to do with command squads. The order in which it was hidden or showing ruining it. And if it read it one way it worked as intended. Then it failed to work the other way.

@Mayegelt
Copy link
Contributor

Mayegelt commented Jan 9, 2024

Personally i preferred opting command squads out of the Group Selection Entry Link. And making a unique one for them. As having them linked to the genetic one has caused various issues that keep re-emerging for no apparent reason when the file is saved again.

@The4D6
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The4D6 commented Jan 9, 2024

I'll take a look at fixing it this evening, but that sounds like a reasonable way of doing it

@The4D6 The4D6 linked a pull request Jan 12, 2024 that will close this issue
@nstephenh
Copy link
Contributor

I prefer it being a shared SSE but I can understand wanting to keep some separate, or adding some entries on if it's just one unit that should get them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants