Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WebJobs/ServiceBus] Remove use of reflection to bind to Receiver #18361

Closed
JoshLove-msft opened this issue Feb 2, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #19074
Closed

[WebJobs/ServiceBus] Remove use of reflection to bind to Receiver #18361

JoshLove-msft opened this issue Feb 2, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #19074
Assignees
Labels
Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. Extensions ASP.NET Core extensions Service Bus
Milestone

Comments

@JoshLove-msft
Copy link
Member

I don't think we should get too focused on the reflection perf here. This needs to be fixed to use a public API.

Originally posted by @pakrym in #18330 (comment)

@ghost ghost added the needs-triage Workflow: This is a new issue that needs to be triaged to the appropriate team. label Feb 2, 2021
@JoshLove-msft JoshLove-msft added Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. Extensions ASP.NET Core extensions Service Bus labels Feb 2, 2021
@ghost ghost removed the needs-triage Workflow: This is a new issue that needs to be triaged to the appropriate team. label Feb 2, 2021
@JoshLove-msft JoshLove-msft self-assigned this Feb 2, 2021
@JoshLove-msft JoshLove-msft added this to the [2021] March milestone Feb 25, 2021
@JoshLove-msft JoshLove-msft linked a pull request Feb 26, 2021 that will close this issue
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 28, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. Extensions ASP.NET Core extensions Service Bus
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant