Skip to content

Comments

mgmt, generate paloaltonetworks.ngfw first preview#34486

Merged
haolingdong-msft merged 8 commits intoAzure:mainfrom
haolingdong-msft:release-paloalto-mgmt
Apr 19, 2023
Merged

mgmt, generate paloaltonetworks.ngfw first preview#34486
haolingdong-msft merged 8 commits intoAzure:mainfrom
haolingdong-msft:release-paloalto-mgmt

Conversation

@haolingdong-msft
Copy link
Member

@haolingdong-msft haolingdong-msft commented Apr 17, 2023

Release request: https://github.com/Azure/sdk-release-request/issues/3924
Arch board review: https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-pr/issues/892

Description

Please add an informative description that covers that changes made by the pull request and link all relevant issues.

If an SDK is being regenerated based on a new swagger spec, a link to the pull request containing these swagger spec changes has been included above.

All SDK Contribution checklist:

  • The pull request does not introduce [breaking changes]
  • CHANGELOG is updated for new features, bug fixes or other significant changes.
  • I have read the contribution guidelines.

General Guidelines and Best Practices

  • Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For more information on cleaning up the commits in your PR, see this page.

Testing Guidelines

  • Pull request includes test coverage for the included changes.

@haolingdong-msft haolingdong-msft changed the title mgmt, generate resourcemanager.paloaltonetworks.ngfw first preview mgmt, generate paloaltonetworks.ngfw first preview Apr 17, 2023
import java.util.stream.Collectors;

/** Entry point to NgfwManager. */
public final class NgfwManager {
Copy link
Contributor

@XiaofeiCao XiaofeiCao Apr 17, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe PaloAltoNetworksNgfwManager?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi service team, we will need your suggestion on the Manager name.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PaloAltoNetworksNgfwManager sounds good, as it in line with the finalized namespace.


## 1.0.0-beta.1 (2023-04-17)

- Azure Resource Manager ngfw client library for Java. This package contains Microsoft Azure SDK for ngfw Management SDK. Package tag package-2022-08-29-preview. For documentation on how to use this package, please see [Azure Management Libraries for Java](https://aka.ms/azsdk/java/mgmt).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Azure Resourcemanager PaloAlto Networks ngfw client library for Java?

Copy link
Member

@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft Apr 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please delete the 2nd line "Azure Resource Manager ngfw client library for Java..."

@haolingdong-msft
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run prepare-pipelines

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@weidongxu-microsoft
Copy link
Member

The script did not update https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-java/blob/main/eng/mgmt/automation/api-specs.yaml ?

It should add a line with "suffix". If script not modify that, you may have to do it by hand.

@weidongxu-microsoft
Copy link
Member

image

@haolingdong-msft
Copy link
Member Author

The script did not update https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-java/blob/main/eng/mgmt/automation/api-specs.yaml ?

It should add a line with "suffix". If script not modify that, you may have to do it by hand.

I will add it manually, the script does not add it.

@XiaofeiCao
Copy link
Contributor

After the PR's merged, we may need to add the service-name configuration to the specs repo's readme.java.

@weidongxu-microsoft
Copy link
Member

After the PR's merged, we may need to add the service-name configuration to the specs repo's readme.java.

I think Haoling already done it.

@haolingdong-msft
Copy link
Member Author

After the PR's merged, we may need to add the service-name configuration to the specs repo's readme.java.

Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#23599 this is the pr

@haolingdong-msft
Copy link
Member Author

Deleted the proj and regen again to make sure there is no other file's content is appended wrongly.

@haolingdong-msft
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run prepare-pipelines

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@haolingdong-msft haolingdong-msft marked this pull request as ready for review April 19, 2023 08:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants