Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Split maven structure #89

Closed
manzke opened this issue May 28, 2012 · 3 comments
Closed

Split maven structure #89

manzke opened this issue May 28, 2012 · 3 comments
Milestone
Backlog

Comments

@manzke
Copy link

manzke commented May 28, 2012

You should split the maven structure for the different apis (blob, table, queue, service bus, service runtime, ...)

Have a look at: https://github.com/manzke/azure-sdk-for-java
joostdenijs pushed a commit to joostdenijs/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this issue Jan 18, 2013
Merge pull request Azure#124 from loudej/remove-proxy
56c6c83 
Removing proxy settings. Fixes Azure#89
joostdenijs pushed a commit to joostdenijs/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this issue Jan 18, 2013
Merge pull request Azure#89 from gcheng/nodate
83e7de1 
remove dates from the copyright.
@jcookems
Copy link
Contributor

Closed by accident (commit referenced this id, but was for a different repo)

@jcookems jcookems reopened this Jan 19, 2013
@gcheng
Copy link

gcheng commented Feb 21, 2013

there is a pull request.

@ghost ghost assigned guangyang Feb 21, 2013
@gcheng
Copy link

gcheng commented Jun 24, 2014

this is done now!

@gcheng gcheng closed this as completed Jun 24, 2014
jianghaolu pushed a commit to jianghaolu/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2017
Merge pull request Azure#89 from gcheng/nodate
bf2817e 
remove dates from the copyright.
g2vinay pushed a commit to g2vinay/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this issue Mar 4, 2019
Merge pull request Azure#89 from jofriedm-msft/dev
1ce11af 
Dev
mssfang pushed a commit to mssfang/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this issue Apr 23, 2019
@yvgopal
Minor bug fix (Azure#89)
ad60ef7 
* Fixing javadoc generation errors

* Adding dependency to use SLF4J logging instead of java util logging.

* More SLF4J migration

* Changed all java util logging statements to slf4j.

* Checking in the POM that goes with the release to maven reposisory.

* Removed unused imports

* Instrumented all code with SLF4J logging.

* Fixing some log statements

* Moving request-response link creation to message factory so we don't create multiple links to the same entity.

* Updaing third party notice to include SLF4J license.

* Updating distributed POM

* Renaming setContent method to setBody.

* Fixing a typo in log statement.

* Handling the special case of 0 timeout for receives. If there are no prefetched messages, receive call returns immediately with already prefetched messages.

* Correcting a log statement

* Added javadoc comments for rules package.

* Adding javadoc comments. Work in progress.

* More javadoc comments added.

* Fixing a minor bug in sender and receiver creation. Closes the messaging factory if sender or receiver creation fails.

* Fixing the issue of not renewing CBS tokens. Also a concurrency fix.

* Fixing a bug in session receiver to not repeatedly attempt accepting the same session on lock lost.

* Added some java docs.. And changed default prefetch count, based on receive mode.

* Fixing a thread unending wait bug in request-response link.

* Fixing AuthorizationFailed exceptions that pop when the conncetion is recreated.

* Minor tweaks

* Another minor fix
navalev pushed a commit to navalev/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this issue Dec 24, 2019
@eladiw
Adding autocomplete UnitTests: OneTerm and two terms (Azure#89)
7f55949 
* task 1031 - Adding Autocomplete two terms tests

* task 1028 - Adding autocomplete OneTerm UTs
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 13, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@manzke @jcookems @gcheng @lodejard @guangyang