diff --git a/barretenberg/cpp/scripts/test_chonk_standalone_vks_havent_changed.sh b/barretenberg/cpp/scripts/test_chonk_standalone_vks_havent_changed.sh
index 12a9b4dfba8b..e2a295232b80 100755
--- a/barretenberg/cpp/scripts/test_chonk_standalone_vks_havent_changed.sh
+++ b/barretenberg/cpp/scripts/test_chonk_standalone_vks_havent_changed.sh
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ cd ..
 # - Generate a hash for versioning: sha256sum bb-chonk-inputs.tar.gz
 # - Upload the compressed results: aws s3 cp bb-chonk-inputs.tar.gz s3://aztec-ci-artifacts/protocol/bb-chonk-inputs-[hash(0:8)].tar.gz
 # Note: In case of the "Test suite failed to run ... Unexpected token 'with' " error, need to run: docker pull aztecprotocol/build:3.0
-pinned_short_hash="bd98634a"
-pinned_chonk_inputs_url="https://aztec-ci-artifacts.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/protocol/bb-chonk-inputs-${pinned_short_hash}.tar.gz"
+pinned_short_hash="abdb6bae"
+pinned_chonk_inputs_url="https://aztec-ci-artifacts.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/protocol/bb-civc-inputs-${pinned_short_hash}.tar.gz"
 
 function compress_and_upload {
     # 1) Compress the results
diff --git a/barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/dsl/acir_format/acir_format.test.cpp b/barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/dsl/acir_format/acir_format.test.cpp
index c97cb61ce74e..3053946f77b2 100644
--- a/barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/dsl/acir_format/acir_format.test.cpp
+++ b/barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/dsl/acir_format/acir_format.test.cpp
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 
 #include "acir_format.hpp"
 #include "acir_format_mocks.hpp"
+#include "acir_to_constraint_buf.hpp"
 #include "barretenberg/common/streams.hpp"
 #include "barretenberg/op_queue/ecc_op_queue.hpp"
 
@@ -341,3 +342,82 @@ TEST_F(AcirFormatTests, TestBigAdd)
 
     EXPECT_TRUE(CircuitChecker::check(builder));
 }
+
+// Helper function to convert a uint256_t to a 32-byte vector in big-endian format
+std::vector<uint8_t> to_bytes_be(uint256_t value)
+{
+    std::vector<uint8_t> bytes(32, 0);
+    for (size_t i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
+        bytes[31 - i] = static_cast<uint8_t>(value & 0xFF);
+        value >>= 8;
+    }
+    return bytes;
+}
+
+/**
+ * @brief Test for bug fix where expressions with distinct witnesses requiring more than one width-4 gate
+ *        were incorrectly processed when they initially appeared to fit in width-3 gates
+ *
+ * @details This test verifies the fix for a bug in handle_arithmetic where an expression with:
+ *  - 1 mul term using witnesses (w0 * w1)
+ *  - 3 additional linear terms using distinct witnesses (w2, w3, w4)
+ *
+ *  Such expressions have ≤3 linear combinations and ≤1 mul term, appearing to fit in a
+ *  poly_triple (width-3) gate. However, with all 5 witnesses distinct, serialize_arithmetic_gate
+ *  correctly returns all zeros, indicating it cannot fit in a width-3 gate.
+ *
+ *  The bug: old code would check if poly_triple was all zeros, and if so, directly add to
+ *  quad_constraints via serialize_mul_quad_gate. But it did this inside the initial
+ *  might_fit_in_polytriple check, so it would never properly go through the mul_quad processing
+ *  logic that handles the general case with >4 witnesses.
+ *
+ *  The fix: now uses a needs_to_be_parsed_as_mul_quad flag that is set when poly_triple fails,
+ *  and processes through the proper mul_quad logic path, which splits into multiple gates.
+ *
+ *  Expression: w0 * w1 + w2 + w3 + w4 = 10
+ *  With witnesses: w0=0, w1=1, w2=2, w3=3, w4=4
+ *  Evaluation: 0*1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 9, but we set q_c = -9, so constraint is: 9 - 9 = 0
+ */
+TEST_F(AcirFormatTests, TestArithmeticGateWithDistinctWitnessesRegression)
+{
+    // Create an ACIR expression: w0 * w1 + w2 + w3 + w4 - 9 = 0
+    // This has 1 mul term and 3 linear terms with all 5 distinct witnesses (requires multiple width-4 gates)
+    Acir::Expression expr{ .mul_terms = { std::make_tuple(
+                               to_bytes_be(1), Acir::Witness{ .value = 0 }, Acir::Witness{ .value = 1 }) },
+                           .linear_combinations = { std::make_tuple(to_bytes_be(1), Acir::Witness{ .value = 2 }),
+                                                    std::make_tuple(to_bytes_be(1), Acir::Witness{ .value = 3 }),
+                                                    std::make_tuple(to_bytes_be(1), Acir::Witness{ .value = 4 }) },
+                           .q_c = to_bytes_be(static_cast<uint256_t>(fr(-9))) };
+
+    Acir::Opcode::AssertZero assert_zero{ .value = expr };
+
+    // Create an ACIR circuit with this opcode
+    Acir::Circuit circuit{
+        .current_witness_index = 5,
+        .opcodes = { Acir::Opcode{ .value = assert_zero } },
+        .return_values = {},
+    };
+
+    Acir::Program program{ .functions = { circuit } };
+
+    // Serialize the program to bytes
+    auto program_bytes = program.bincodeSerialize();
+
+    // Process through circuit_buf_to_acir_format (this calls handle_arithmetic internally)
+    AcirFormat constraint_system = circuit_buf_to_acir_format(std::move(program_bytes));
+
+    // The key assertion: this expression should end up in big_quad_constraints, not poly_triple_constraints
+    // or single quad_constraints, because it needs 5 witness slots (all distinct)
+    EXPECT_EQ(constraint_system.poly_triple_constraints.size(), 0);
+    EXPECT_EQ(constraint_system.quad_constraints.size(), 0);
+    EXPECT_EQ(constraint_system.big_quad_constraints.size(), 1);
+
+    // Now verify the constraint system with valid witness assignments
+    // We need: w0 * w1 + w2 + w3 + w4 = 9
+    // Use values: w0=0, w1=1, w2=2, w3=3, w4=4, so 0*1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 9
+    WitnessVector witness{ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 };
+    AcirProgram acir_program{ constraint_system, witness };
+    auto builder = create_circuit(acir_program);
+
+    EXPECT_TRUE(CircuitChecker::check(builder));
+}
diff --git a/barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/dsl/acir_format/acir_to_constraint_buf.cpp b/barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/dsl/acir_format/acir_to_constraint_buf.cpp
index 84ef21dfb8c7..b0304fbf1149 100644
--- a/barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/dsl/acir_format/acir_to_constraint_buf.cpp
+++ b/barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/dsl/acir_format/acir_to_constraint_buf.cpp
@@ -459,7 +459,9 @@ std::pair<uint32_t, uint32_t> is_assert_equal(Acir::Opcode::AssertZero const& ar
 void handle_arithmetic(Acir::Opcode::AssertZero const& arg, AcirFormat& af, size_t opcode_index)
 {
     // If the expression fits in a polytriple, we use it.
-    if (arg.value.linear_combinations.size() <= 3 && arg.value.mul_terms.size() <= 1) {
+    bool might_fit_in_polytriple = arg.value.linear_combinations.size() <= 3 && arg.value.mul_terms.size() <= 1;
+    bool needs_to_be_parsed_as_mul_quad = !might_fit_in_polytriple;
+    if (might_fit_in_polytriple) {
         poly_triple pt = serialize_arithmetic_gate(arg.value);
 
         auto assert_equal = is_assert_equal(arg, pt, af);
@@ -502,15 +504,14 @@ void handle_arithmetic(Acir::Opcode::AssertZero const& arg, AcirFormat& af, size
         // gate. This is the case if the linear terms are all distinct witness from the multiplication term. In that
         // case, the serialize_arithmetic_gate() function will return a poly_triple with all 0's, and we use a width-4
         // gate instead. We could probably always use a width-4 gate in fact.
-        if (pt == poly_triple{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }) {
-            af.quad_constraints.push_back(serialize_mul_quad_gate(arg.value));
-            af.original_opcode_indices.quad_constraints.push_back(opcode_index);
-
-        } else {
+        if (pt != poly_triple{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }) {
             af.poly_triple_constraints.push_back(pt);
             af.original_opcode_indices.poly_triple_constraints.push_back(opcode_index);
+        } else {
+            needs_to_be_parsed_as_mul_quad = true;
         }
-    } else {
+    }
+    if (needs_to_be_parsed_as_mul_quad) {
         std::vector<mul_quad_<fr>> mul_quads;
         // We try to use a single mul_quad gate to represent the expression.
         if (arg.value.mul_terms.size() <= 1) {