Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 7, 2023. It is now read-only.

Error: Missing html/text field on Linter Response #74

Closed
RodideBoer opened this issue Sep 23, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Error: Missing html/text field on Linter Response #74

RodideBoer opened this issue Sep 23, 2016 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@RodideBoer
Copy link

I get the following error when opening and editing a file:

Error: Missing html/text field on Linter Response
    at /Users/rodi/.atom/packages/linter/lib/validate.coffee:39:19
    at Array.forEach (native)
    at Object.module.exports.Validate.messages (/Users/rodi/.atom/packages/linter/lib/validate.coffee:26:14)
    at MessageRegistry.set (/Users/rodi/.atom/packages/linter/lib/message-registry.js:36:16)
    at /Users/rodi/.atom/packages/linter/lib/linter.coffee:37:17
    at Function.module.exports.Emitter.simpleDispatch (/Applications/Atom.app/Contents/Resources/app.asar/node_modules/event-kit/lib/emitter.js:25:14)
    at Emitter.module.exports.Emitter.emit (/Applications/Atom.app/Contents/Resources/app.asar/node_modules/event-kit/lib/emitter.js:125:28)
    at /Users/rodi/.atom/packages/linter/lib/linter-registry.js:66:26
@Arcanemagus
Copy link
Member

Interesting, are you able to share the file to try reproducing it?

@Arcanemagus
Copy link
Member

Nevermind, seems to happen on any file, looking into it.

@RodideBoer
Copy link
Author

thanks you

@Arcanemagus
Copy link
Member

Apparently I broke this using an ES6 syntax that apparently works in some places in Coffescript... but doesn't in others. I'm getting specs working, then I'll just be converting this package to ES6 so it's usable source code...

@Arcanemagus
Copy link
Member

v1.4.0 is out fixing this, and automatically installing Linter if it isn't already, now back to getting specs working so stuff like this doesn't get released 😛.

@RodideBoer
Copy link
Author

great! 👍

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants