Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bulk add part attribute fails #7924

Closed
cjconroy opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Bulk add part attribute fails #7924

cjconroy opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
contact auto-added from contact template
Milestone

Comments

@cjconroy
Copy link

cjconroy commented Jul 9, 2024

I have a series of phalli that are in arctos as preserved in formalin and preserved in ethanol. Now, they are cleared and stained. I searched for the specimens, went to manage parts, used option 4 to add cleared and stained attribute to all of them. Click the button. Nothing happens. Is this a known problem? I tried this in front of Michelle Koo and she did not see any mistakes on my part. MacOS, Chrome. MVZ specimens 233124, 233130, 233131, 235821, and 235842.

Screenshot 2024-07-09 at 1 50 23 PM
@cjconroy cjconroy added the contact auto-added from contact template label Jul 9, 2024
@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented Jul 9, 2024

I did

Screenshot 2024-07-09 at 14 54 26

and it came back with

Screenshot 2024-07-09 at 14 54 39

Chrome

Yea, sounds like it....

@dustymc dustymc added this to the mystery milestone Jul 9, 2024
@cjconroy
Copy link
Author

Thanks for fixing my records, but what is the solution? These tools just look broken and no way to discern what the problem is.

@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented Jul 10, 2024

tools just look broken

They're not, they work for me (and so should work with a standard browser on a decent network within certain limitations - a fuzzy line, but certainly a few records are on the safe side of it).

(I can't ask you to try in test because https://github.com/ArctosDB/internal/issues/326).

what is the solution

Component loaders are much more scalable (the expensive stuff can happen in bite-size chunks), are easier to debug (the important stuff happens where I can see it, not in your browser), and can do all the things the 'manage' tools do. I'd fully transition to them if that was up to me.

@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented Aug 27, 2024

Noted in #8014, nothing else to do here.

@dustymc dustymc closed this as completed Aug 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
contact auto-added from contact template
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants