You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
dt issues a warning for any serial number not in YYYYMMDDNN format. As an experienced DNS operator, I disagree with this opinion. The serial number can be in any format that allows the operator to operate the zone effectively. YYYYMMDDNN is just a recommendation, and is mainly for hand-maintained zones that don't change often. For anything else, unixtime, or a simple increment, is more useful, and it should not be flagged as a warning. I think that the check for the format of the serial format should be dropped altogether. Emitting a false warning is misleading.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dt issues a warning for any serial number not in YYYYMMDDNN format. As an experienced DNS operator, I disagree with this opinion. The serial number can be in any format that allows the operator to operate the zone effectively. YYYYMMDDNN is just a recommendation, and is mainly for hand-maintained zones that don't change often. For anything else, unixtime, or a simple increment, is more useful, and it should not be flagged as a warning. I think that the check for the format of the serial format should be dropped altogether. Emitting a false warning is misleading.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: